Efficacy & safety of brolucizumab 6.0 mg versus 3.6 mg in diabetic macular edema.

Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Pradeep Kumar, Amrita Joshi, Aman Saraf, Abhijeet Awasthi, Supriya Dhar, Khaleel M, Atul Kumar, Vipin Rana, Ravi D
{"title":"Efficacy & safety of brolucizumab 6.0 mg versus 3.6 mg in diabetic macular edema.","authors":"Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Pradeep Kumar, Amrita Joshi, Aman Saraf, Abhijeet Awasthi, Supriya Dhar, Khaleel M, Atul Kumar, Vipin Rana, Ravi D","doi":"10.1186/s40942-025-00628-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of Diabetic Macular edema (DME) requires repeated injections. Therefore newer Anti-VEGFs like Brolucizumab with longer durability have been introduced. We compared two different dosages of Brolucizumab, 6.0 mg and 3.6 mg, for their safety & efficacy in treatment of DME, in treatment naïve patients over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective, pilot randomised controlled, single centre, double blinded, two arm comparative study was conducted between Dec 2022 to Apr 2024. The study recruited 82 patients of DME who were randomised into two groups of 41 patients each, one group to be treated with Brolucizumab 6.0 mg in 50 μL and the other to receive 3.6 mg in 30 μL. All patients received the first dose of Brolucizumab at 0 week and were then followed up at every 4 weeks for detailed ophthalmic and OCT macula examination. Those who met the pre-defined re-treatment criteria were re-injected with Brolucizumab, the dose being fixed for each group throughout the study. All patient receiving an injection were further followed up on Day 1, Day 7 and Day 28 to look for any adverse reactions. The efficacy parameters included change in best corrected visusal acuity (BCVA), contrast and central macular thickness (CMT) on Optical Coherence Tomography. The average number of injections recd in each group were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The change in BCVA from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 0.54 LogMAR units and 3.6 mg group was 0.59 LogMAR units, which was not statistically significant. The reduction in CMT from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 133.2 µm (μ) and 3.6 mg group was 110.6 μ, which was not statistically significant. The improvement in contrast from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 0.74 and 3.6 mg group was 0.95, with p value of 0.0002. The re-injection interval was 14.21 weeks in 6.0 mg group and 15.56 weeks for 3.6 mg subgroup. The total number of adverse events in both groups were similar at 70 in 6.0 mg group and 47 in 3.6 mg group with only one grade 4 adverse event occurring in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of present study show that the safety and efficacy of both doses of Brolucizumab, i.e. 6.0 mg and 3.6 mg, for treating diabetic macular edema is similar. Trial registration Study was registered with Clinical trials registry of India (CTRI ref no. CTRI/2023/06/054105), registered on 14 Nov 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":14289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","volume":"11 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retina and Vitreous","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-025-00628-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of Diabetic Macular edema (DME) requires repeated injections. Therefore newer Anti-VEGFs like Brolucizumab with longer durability have been introduced. We compared two different dosages of Brolucizumab, 6.0 mg and 3.6 mg, for their safety & efficacy in treatment of DME, in treatment naïve patients over 52 weeks.

Method: A prospective, pilot randomised controlled, single centre, double blinded, two arm comparative study was conducted between Dec 2022 to Apr 2024. The study recruited 82 patients of DME who were randomised into two groups of 41 patients each, one group to be treated with Brolucizumab 6.0 mg in 50 μL and the other to receive 3.6 mg in 30 μL. All patients received the first dose of Brolucizumab at 0 week and were then followed up at every 4 weeks for detailed ophthalmic and OCT macula examination. Those who met the pre-defined re-treatment criteria were re-injected with Brolucizumab, the dose being fixed for each group throughout the study. All patient receiving an injection were further followed up on Day 1, Day 7 and Day 28 to look for any adverse reactions. The efficacy parameters included change in best corrected visusal acuity (BCVA), contrast and central macular thickness (CMT) on Optical Coherence Tomography. The average number of injections recd in each group were also calculated.

Results: The change in BCVA from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 0.54 LogMAR units and 3.6 mg group was 0.59 LogMAR units, which was not statistically significant. The reduction in CMT from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 133.2 µm (μ) and 3.6 mg group was 110.6 μ, which was not statistically significant. The improvement in contrast from baseline in 6.0 mg group was 0.74 and 3.6 mg group was 0.95, with p value of 0.0002. The re-injection interval was 14.21 weeks in 6.0 mg group and 15.56 weeks for 3.6 mg subgroup. The total number of adverse events in both groups were similar at 70 in 6.0 mg group and 47 in 3.6 mg group with only one grade 4 adverse event occurring in each group.

Conclusion: The results of present study show that the safety and efficacy of both doses of Brolucizumab, i.e. 6.0 mg and 3.6 mg, for treating diabetic macular edema is similar. Trial registration Study was registered with Clinical trials registry of India (CTRI ref no. CTRI/2023/06/054105), registered on 14 Nov 2022.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
brolucizumab 6.0 mg vs 3.6 mg治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性。
背景:糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的治疗需要反复注射。因此,新的抗vegf如Brolucizumab具有更长的持久性。我们比较了两种不同剂量的Brolucizumab (6.0 mg和3.6 mg)在治疗naïve患者超过52周的DME中的安全性和有效性。方法:于2022年12月至2024年4月进行前瞻性、随机对照、单中心、双盲、双臂比较研究。该研究招募了82名DME患者,随机分为两组,每组41名患者,一组接受Brolucizumab 6.0 mg / 50 μL治疗,另一组接受3.6 mg / 30 μL治疗。所有患者在第0周接受第一剂Brolucizumab,然后每4周随访一次,进行详细的眼科和OCT黄斑检查。那些符合预先定义的再治疗标准的患者再次注射Brolucizumab,在整个研究过程中,每组的剂量是固定的。所有接受注射的患者在第1天,第7天和第28天进一步随访,以寻找任何不良反应。疗效指标包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、对比度和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)的变化。计算各组平均注射次数。结果:6.0 mg组BCVA较基线变化为0.54 LogMAR单位,3.6 mg组为0.59 LogMAR单位,差异无统计学意义。6.0 mg组CMT较基线减少133.2 μ m (μ), 3.6 mg组CMT较基线减少110.6 μ,差异无统计学意义。6.0 mg组较基线改善0.74,3.6 mg组较基线改善0.95,p值为0.0002。6.0 mg组再注射时间为14.21周,3.6 mg亚组再注射时间为15.56周。两组不良事件总数相似,6.0 mg组为70例,3.6 mg组为47例,两组仅发生1例4级不良事件。结论:本研究结果显示,6.0 mg和3.6 mg两种剂量的Brolucizumab治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的安全性和有效性相似。试验注册研究已在印度临床试验注册中心注册(CTRI参考号:CTRI/2023/06/054105),于2022年11月14日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Retina and Vitreous focuses on the ophthalmic subspecialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The journal presents original articles on new approaches to diagnosis, outcomes of clinical trials, innovations in pharmacological therapy and surgical techniques, as well as basic science advances that impact clinical practice. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Imaging of the retina, choroid and vitreous -Innovations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) -Small-gauge vitrectomy, retinal detachment, chromovitrectomy -Electroretinography (ERG), microperimetry, other functional tests -Intraocular tumors -Retinal pharmacotherapy & drug delivery -Diabetic retinopathy & other vascular diseases -Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) & other macular entities
期刊最新文献
Automated and code-free development of a risk calculator using ChatGPT-4 for predicting diabetic retinopathy and macular edema without retinal imaging. Impact of duration of treatments with metformin and sulfonylureas, individually or in combination, on diabetic retinopathy among newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients: a pooled cohort's analysis. The role of optical coherence tomography angiography in assessing diabetic choroidopathy: a systematic review. Semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, and the risk of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) findings over time: ultrasound and ultra-widefield fundus photography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1