Blended soil amendments: A viable strategy to reduce soluble phosphorus in soils.

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of environmental quality Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20673
Darshani Kumaragamage, Haven Soto, Emily Van, Douglas Goltz, Inoka Amarakoon
{"title":"Blended soil amendments: A viable strategy to reduce soluble phosphorus in soils.","authors":"Darshani Kumaragamage, Haven Soto, Emily Van, Douglas Goltz, Inoka Amarakoon","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phosphorus (P) loss from soils can contribute significantly toward P enrichment in water bodies, impairing water quality. Application of soil amendments is a viable strategy to decrease soluble P in surface soils. Since soluble P is reduced through different mechanisms that are amendment-specific, blended amendments could be a better approach than single amendment applications; however, very little information is available on blended amendment effects in reducing P loss from soils. We compared the effectiveness of gypsum (CaSO<sub>4</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O), Epsom salt (MgSO<sub>4</sub>·7H<sub>2</sub>O), and alum [Al<sub>2</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>·18H<sub>2</sub>O] applied singly or blended in different ratios in reducing water-extractable P (WEP) and Mehlich-3 P of two soils (0- to 15-cm depth) with contrasting P status (Mehlich-3 P of 7.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 202 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) from the Red River Valley region in MB, Canada. Ten treatments used for the laboratory incubation study were unamended control, gypsum or Epsom salt at 2.5 or 5 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>, alum at 2.5 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>, and four blended treatments of gypsum: alum or Epsom salt: alum at 1:1 or 2:1. Treated soils were saturated and incubated for 2 weeks and analyzed for WEP (an indicator of risk of P loss) and Mehlich-3 P (plant-available P) concentrations. All amendments significantly reduced the WEP concentrations compared to control in both soils. The blended amendments, particularly gypsum-alum blends, performed better than unblended amendments in reducing the potential risk of P loss. Mehlich-3 P concentration was not influenced by amended treatments, suggesting no significant decrease in plant-available P with amendments in both soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) loss from soils can contribute significantly toward P enrichment in water bodies, impairing water quality. Application of soil amendments is a viable strategy to decrease soluble P in surface soils. Since soluble P is reduced through different mechanisms that are amendment-specific, blended amendments could be a better approach than single amendment applications; however, very little information is available on blended amendment effects in reducing P loss from soils. We compared the effectiveness of gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O), Epsom salt (MgSO4·7H2O), and alum [Al2(SO4)3·18H2O] applied singly or blended in different ratios in reducing water-extractable P (WEP) and Mehlich-3 P of two soils (0- to 15-cm depth) with contrasting P status (Mehlich-3 P of 7.1 mg kg-1 and 202 mg kg-1) from the Red River Valley region in MB, Canada. Ten treatments used for the laboratory incubation study were unamended control, gypsum or Epsom salt at 2.5 or 5 Mg ha-1, alum at 2.5 Mg ha-1, and four blended treatments of gypsum: alum or Epsom salt: alum at 1:1 or 2:1. Treated soils were saturated and incubated for 2 weeks and analyzed for WEP (an indicator of risk of P loss) and Mehlich-3 P (plant-available P) concentrations. All amendments significantly reduced the WEP concentrations compared to control in both soils. The blended amendments, particularly gypsum-alum blends, performed better than unblended amendments in reducing the potential risk of P loss. Mehlich-3 P concentration was not influenced by amended treatments, suggesting no significant decrease in plant-available P with amendments in both soils.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合土壤改良剂:减少土壤中可溶性磷的可行策略。
土壤中磷的流失对水体磷的富集起着重要的促进作用,从而影响水质。施用土壤改良剂是降低表层土壤可溶性磷的可行策略。由于可溶性磷是通过不同的机制减少的,这些机制是特定于改良剂的,混合改良剂可能比单一改良剂应用更好;然而,关于混合改良剂在减少土壤磷流失方面的作用的资料很少。本研究比较了石膏(CaSO4·2H2O)、Epsom盐(MgSO4·7H2O)和明矾[Al2(SO4)3·18H2O]单独施用或以不同比例混合施用对加拿大MB红河谷地区两种土壤(0 ~ 15 cm深度)的水提性磷(WEP)和mehlich - 3p的效果,并对比了不同土壤的P状态(mehlich - 3p为7.1 mg kg-1和202 mg kg-1)。用于实验室培养研究的10种处理是未经修正的对照,石膏或泻盐2.5或5 Mg ha-1,明矾2.5 Mg ha-1,以及石膏:明矾或泻盐:明矾1:1或2:1的混合处理。处理后的土壤饱和并孵育2周,分析WEP(磷损失风险指标)和mehlich - 3p(植物有效磷)浓度。在两种土壤中,与对照相比,所有修正均显著降低了WEP浓度。混合改良剂,特别是石膏-明矾混合物,在降低磷损失的潜在风险方面比未混合改良剂表现更好。改良处理不影响mehlich - 3p浓度,表明两种土壤的植物速效磷在改良处理后均未显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
期刊最新文献
Methane emission reduction by adding sulfate to liquid dairy manure. Phosphorus budgets of intensively managed row crops at a long-term agroecosystem research site in the upper US Midwest. Stream pathogenic bacteria levels rebound post-population control of wild pigs. Changes in riverine dissolved organic matter caused by gypsum-induced flocculation. Phosphorus and cover crop management practices affect phosphorus speciation in soils and eroded sediments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1