Preoperative risk assessment and optimization integrating surgical and anesthetic principles and practices: a national survey for internists.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1186/s13741-024-00489-2
Marc-Antoine Lepage, Annie Lecavalier, Gabriele Baldini, Ning-Zi Sun, Amal Bessissow
{"title":"Preoperative risk assessment and optimization integrating surgical and anesthetic principles and practices: a national survey for internists.","authors":"Marc-Antoine Lepage, Annie Lecavalier, Gabriele Baldini, Ning-Zi Sun, Amal Bessissow","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00489-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of procedure-specific risks into preoperative patient assessment and optimization are crucial aspects of perioperative care. However, data on internists' knowledge of surgical and anesthetic principles and practices are limited. We thus sought to identify internists' knowledge gaps in terms of surgical- and anesthetic-specific risk factors and characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open and voluntary e-survey was conducted via LimeSurvey between April and July 2021 to evaluate Canadian internists' knowledge of surgical and anesthetic principles and practices. The survey included the perceived importance and knowledge of several key surgical and anesthetic aspects, such as surgery duration, procedure-specific cardiac risk, bleeding risk, and thrombotic risk. It also assessed pre- and post-survey self-reported confidence levels in one's knowledge of these characteristics. Finally, we investigated how internists optimize some of the preoperative risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 Canadian internists opened the survey link, and 121 completed it (completion rate 70%). While the majority of respondents considered surgical and anesthetic principles and practices as important, most identified knowledge gaps. Participants generally estimated surgery duration and procedure-specific cardiac risk adequately. However, they tended to underestimate procedure-specific bleeding risk for general (58%) and orthopedic (76%) surgeries and to overestimate procedure-specific thrombotic risk for vascular (63%) and genitourinary (60%) surgeries. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate hemoglobin A1c target and 0% of respondents reported using the guideline-suggested hemoglobin threshold for investigation and intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our findings identify significant knowledge gaps among Canadian internists in preoperative assessment of procedure-specific risk factors and can be used to inform both the development of educational initiatives and future research to improve the quality of preoperative patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00489-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of procedure-specific risks into preoperative patient assessment and optimization are crucial aspects of perioperative care. However, data on internists' knowledge of surgical and anesthetic principles and practices are limited. We thus sought to identify internists' knowledge gaps in terms of surgical- and anesthetic-specific risk factors and characteristics.

Methods: An open and voluntary e-survey was conducted via LimeSurvey between April and July 2021 to evaluate Canadian internists' knowledge of surgical and anesthetic principles and practices. The survey included the perceived importance and knowledge of several key surgical and anesthetic aspects, such as surgery duration, procedure-specific cardiac risk, bleeding risk, and thrombotic risk. It also assessed pre- and post-survey self-reported confidence levels in one's knowledge of these characteristics. Finally, we investigated how internists optimize some of the preoperative risks.

Results: A total of 173 Canadian internists opened the survey link, and 121 completed it (completion rate 70%). While the majority of respondents considered surgical and anesthetic principles and practices as important, most identified knowledge gaps. Participants generally estimated surgery duration and procedure-specific cardiac risk adequately. However, they tended to underestimate procedure-specific bleeding risk for general (58%) and orthopedic (76%) surgeries and to overestimate procedure-specific thrombotic risk for vascular (63%) and genitourinary (60%) surgeries. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate hemoglobin A1c target and 0% of respondents reported using the guideline-suggested hemoglobin threshold for investigation and intervention.

Conclusions: Overall, our findings identify significant knowledge gaps among Canadian internists in preoperative assessment of procedure-specific risk factors and can be used to inform both the development of educational initiatives and future research to improve the quality of preoperative patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前风险评估和优化整合手术和麻醉原则和实践:一项针对内科医生的全国性调查。
背景:将手术特异性风险纳入术前患者评估和优化是围手术期护理的重要方面。然而,关于内科医生的手术和麻醉原理和实践知识的数据是有限的。因此,我们试图确定内科医生在手术和麻醉特定危险因素和特征方面的知识差距。方法:于2021年4月至7月通过limessurvey进行公开自愿的电子调查,以评估加拿大内科医生对外科和麻醉原理和实践的知识。该调查包括对几个关键手术和麻醉方面的重要性和认识,如手术时间、手术特异性心脏风险、出血风险和血栓风险。它还评估了调查前和调查后自我报告的对这些特征知识的信心水平。最后,我们调查了内科医生如何优化一些术前风险。结果:共有173名加拿大内科医生打开了调查链接,121名完成了调查,完成率为70%。虽然大多数答复者认为外科和麻醉原则和做法很重要,但大多数人认为存在知识差距。参与者通常充分估计手术时间和特定手术的心脏风险。然而,他们倾向于低估普通手术(58%)和骨科手术(76%)的手术特异性出血风险,高估血管手术(63%)和泌尿生殖系统手术(60%)的手术特异性血栓形成风险。此外,对于合适的血红蛋白A1c目标缺乏共识,0%的受访者报告使用指南建议的血红蛋白阈值进行调查和干预。结论:总体而言,我们的研究结果确定了加拿大内科医生在术前评估手术特定风险因素方面存在显著的知识差距,可用于指导教育活动的发展和未来的研究,以提高术前患者护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perioperative mechanical circulatory support: transitioning from sequential to parallel recovery. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on perioperative neurocognitive disorder in elderly patients undergoing major surgery and associated genetic variant analysis: a randomized clinical trial. Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. Length of stay after colorectal surgery in Italy: the gap between "fit for" and "actual" discharge in a prospective cohort of 4529 cases. Construction and application of a stratified nursing intervention program for postoperative delirium after Stanford type A aortic dissection: a quasi-experimental trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1