Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1186/s13741-024-00486-5
Hanane Barakat, Linda Gholmieh, Jessy Abou Nader, Vanda Yazbeck Karam, Obey Albaini, Mohamad El Helou, Rony Al Nawwar
{"title":"Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial.","authors":"Hanane Barakat, Linda Gholmieh, Jessy Abou Nader, Vanda Yazbeck Karam, Obey Albaini, Mohamad El Helou, Rony Al Nawwar","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00486-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are commonly used in general anesthesia for pain management. However, they are linked to significant side effects. Patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, particularly those with obesity, are at higher risk of experiencing adverse effects associated with opioids. Therefore, there is a need to explore alternative anesthesia options that do not rely on opioids. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) compared to traditional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized controlled trial included eighty-three patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to dexmedetomidine and lidocaine infusion (OFA) or remifentanil (OBA). All patients received intra-operative propofol, sevoflurane, a neuromuscular blocking agent, and ketamine. The primary outcome included opioid consumption during the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary measures included intraoperative hemodynamic stability, time to extubation, PACU stay duration, opioid consumption during the first 48 h, and anti-emetic requirements. Independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess for differences across the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PACU morphine consumption, total postoperative morphine consumption, anti-emetic requirements up to 48 h after surgery, and pain levels after surgery were not statistically significantly different between OFA and OBA groups. Other variables were not statistically different between the two groups, except for intraoperative anti-hypertensives where more patients in the OFA groups required it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opioid-free anesthesia hasn't shown an opioid-sparing effect in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Larger multi-center studies are required to fully establish its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03507634); first trial registration date: 12/04/2018; first posted date: 25/04/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00486-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioids are commonly used in general anesthesia for pain management. However, they are linked to significant side effects. Patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, particularly those with obesity, are at higher risk of experiencing adverse effects associated with opioids. Therefore, there is a need to explore alternative anesthesia options that do not rely on opioids. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) compared to traditional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods: This single-center randomized controlled trial included eighty-three patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a tertiary hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to dexmedetomidine and lidocaine infusion (OFA) or remifentanil (OBA). All patients received intra-operative propofol, sevoflurane, a neuromuscular blocking agent, and ketamine. The primary outcome included opioid consumption during the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary measures included intraoperative hemodynamic stability, time to extubation, PACU stay duration, opioid consumption during the first 48 h, and anti-emetic requirements. Independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess for differences across the two groups.

Results: PACU morphine consumption, total postoperative morphine consumption, anti-emetic requirements up to 48 h after surgery, and pain levels after surgery were not statistically significantly different between OFA and OBA groups. Other variables were not statistically different between the two groups, except for intraoperative anti-hypertensives where more patients in the OFA groups required it.

Conclusions: Opioid-free anesthesia hasn't shown an opioid-sparing effect in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Larger multi-center studies are required to fully establish its effectiveness.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03507634); first trial registration date: 12/04/2018; first posted date: 25/04/2018.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无阿片类药物与阿片类药物麻醉在腹腔镜袖胃切除术中的对比:一项单中心、随机、对照试验。
背景:阿片类药物通常用于全身麻醉的疼痛管理。然而,它们与严重的副作用有关。接受腹腔镜袖胃切除术的患者,特别是肥胖患者,经历阿片类药物相关不良反应的风险更高。因此,有必要探索不依赖阿片类药物的替代麻醉方案。本研究旨在探讨无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)与传统阿片类药物麻醉(OBA)在腹腔镜袖胃切除术患者中的疗效。方法:本单中心随机对照试验纳入83例在某三级医院行腹腔镜袖胃切除术的患者。患者被随机分配到右美托咪定和利多卡因输注组(OFA)或瑞芬太尼输注组(OBA)。所有患者术中均使用异丙酚、七氟醚、一种神经肌肉阻滞剂和氯胺酮。主要结局包括麻醉后护理单位(PACU)期间阿片类药物的消耗。次要指标包括术中血流动力学稳定性、拔管时间、PACU停留时间、前48小时阿片类药物消耗和止吐要求。采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验来评估两组间的差异。结果:PACU吗啡用量、术后吗啡总用量、术后48 h止吐需求、术后疼痛程度OFA组与OBA组比较差异无统计学意义。除术中降压药(OFA组中需要降压药的患者较多)外,其他变量在两组间无统计学差异。结论:无阿片类药物麻醉在实施腹腔镜袖胃切除术的肥胖患者中未显示出阿片类药物节约效果。需要更大规模的多中心研究来充分确定其有效性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03507634);首次试验注册日期:12/04/2018;首次发布日期:25/04/2018。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
An integrated random forest- and LASSO-derived nomogram for predicting postoperative nosocomial infections in colorectal cancer patients. Retrolaminar versus erector spinae plane block for enhanced recovery after cesarean section: a retrospective study. Performance of the hypotension prediction index as an indicator of hypotensive haemodynamic instability in surgical patients. Bayesian statistics: a primer for perioperative medicine clinicians. Combined epidural-general anesthesia reduces opioid use and improves recovery after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1