Parental experiences of caring for their preschool children after declining vaccines: a qualitative systematic review.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00405
Christine Huel, Karen MacKinnon, Jillian Harding, Roya Haghiri-Vijeh, Carol Gordon, Shannon E MacDonald
{"title":"Parental experiences of caring for their preschool children after declining vaccines: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Christine Huel, Karen MacKinnon, Jillian Harding, Roya Haghiri-Vijeh, Carol Gordon, Shannon E MacDonald","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review synthesizes qualitative research about the experiences of parental caregivers enhancing their children's health after making the decision to not vaccinate their preschool children. This review aims to help health care providers understand the parental work involved in caring for under-vaccinated or unvaccinated children.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Much of the current qualitative research literature about parents who are vaccine-hesitant or who decide not to vaccinate their children focuses on parental perceptions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines and decision-making. However, limited attention has been paid to measures taken by parents to help their young children avoid contracting vaccine-preventable communicable diseases, promote resistance, and enhance their children's health.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review considered qualitative studies that described parents' experiences of caring for their young children, aged 0 to 6 years, after making the decision not to vaccinate. Studies undertaken in any context were considered. Studies that focused on young children who were unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated for reasons not related to parental refusal were excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence was followed. Databases were searched from 1998 onward, and included Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, with no language limits. Following critical appraisal, findings that described parental experiences and the care activities they performed relating to their young children were extracted. The JBI process of meta-aggregation was used to identify categories and synthesize findings. The ConQual approach was used to assess confidence in the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies, met the criteria for inclusion. The studies were conducted in 14 countries across 4 continents, with approximately 676 participants. From these studies, 115 findings were extracted and combined to form 12 categories based on similarity in meaning. Three synthesized findings included i) Parental care strategies in the home that focused on the individual and family, ii) Parental care strategies in the community, including how parents managed social interactions and community networks, and iii) Parental care strategies at the systems-level, involving the ways parents challenged societal discourses and institutional work processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The major conclusions from this review highlight the laborious activities that parents enact to care for their children's health after declining vaccines. Care activities extended from the household to the community, encompassing myriad anticipatory and reactive measures. Parents demonstrated a strong commitment to their children's health and well-being while responding to stigma they experienced among their friends, children's teachers, and health care providers. While facing or expecting penalties related to their vaccine choices, parents reached out to like-minded peers for support and planned which next steps to take should punitive measures become overwhelming.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42021241781.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review synthesizes qualitative research about the experiences of parental caregivers enhancing their children's health after making the decision to not vaccinate their preschool children. This review aims to help health care providers understand the parental work involved in caring for under-vaccinated or unvaccinated children.

Introduction: Much of the current qualitative research literature about parents who are vaccine-hesitant or who decide not to vaccinate their children focuses on parental perceptions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines and decision-making. However, limited attention has been paid to measures taken by parents to help their young children avoid contracting vaccine-preventable communicable diseases, promote resistance, and enhance their children's health.

Inclusion criteria: This review considered qualitative studies that described parents' experiences of caring for their young children, aged 0 to 6 years, after making the decision not to vaccinate. Studies undertaken in any context were considered. Studies that focused on young children who were unvaccinated or not fully vaccinated for reasons not related to parental refusal were excluded.

Methods: The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence was followed. Databases were searched from 1998 onward, and included Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, with no language limits. Following critical appraisal, findings that described parental experiences and the care activities they performed relating to their young children were extracted. The JBI process of meta-aggregation was used to identify categories and synthesize findings. The ConQual approach was used to assess confidence in the findings.

Results: Forty studies, met the criteria for inclusion. The studies were conducted in 14 countries across 4 continents, with approximately 676 participants. From these studies, 115 findings were extracted and combined to form 12 categories based on similarity in meaning. Three synthesized findings included i) Parental care strategies in the home that focused on the individual and family, ii) Parental care strategies in the community, including how parents managed social interactions and community networks, and iii) Parental care strategies at the systems-level, involving the ways parents challenged societal discourses and institutional work processes.

Conclusions: The major conclusions from this review highlight the laborious activities that parents enact to care for their children's health after declining vaccines. Care activities extended from the household to the community, encompassing myriad anticipatory and reactive measures. Parents demonstrated a strong commitment to their children's health and well-being while responding to stigma they experienced among their friends, children's teachers, and health care providers. While facing or expecting penalties related to their vaccine choices, parents reached out to like-minded peers for support and planned which next steps to take should punitive measures become overwhelming.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021241781.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母在减少疫苗接种后照顾学龄前儿童的经历:一项定性的系统回顾。
目的:本综述综合定性研究了父母照顾者在决定不给学龄前儿童接种疫苗后对儿童健康的影响。本综述旨在帮助卫生保健提供者了解照顾接种疫苗不足或未接种疫苗的儿童所涉及的父母工作。目前关于是否接种疫苗犹豫不决或决定不给孩子接种疫苗的父母的许多定性研究文献侧重于父母对疫苗的安全性和有效性以及决策的看法。然而,父母为帮助幼儿避免感染疫苗可预防的传染病、增强抵抗力和增进儿童健康所采取的措施却受到了有限的关注。纳入标准:本综述考虑了描述父母在决定不接种疫苗后照顾0至6岁幼儿经历的定性研究。审议了在任何情况下进行的研究。针对未接种疫苗或因与父母拒绝无关的原因未完全接种疫苗的幼儿的研究被排除在外。方法:采用JBI方法对定性证据进行系统评价。检索自1998年起的数据库,包括Web of Science Core Collection、MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost)、PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)、谷歌Scholar和ProQuest Dissertations and Theses,没有语言限制。在进行批判性评估后,提取了描述父母经历和他们对幼儿进行的护理活动的发现。使用元聚合的JBI过程来识别类别和综合结果。使用征服方法来评估对研究结果的信心。结果:40项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究在四大洲的14个国家进行,约有676名参与者。从这些研究中,115个发现被提取出来,并根据意义上的相似性组合成12个类别。三个综合发现包括:1)关注个人和家庭的家庭育儿策略;2)社区育儿策略,包括父母如何管理社会互动和社区网络;3)系统层面的父母育儿策略,包括父母挑战社会话语和机构工作流程的方式。结论:本综述的主要结论强调了在疫苗接种减少后,父母为照顾孩子的健康而采取的艰苦活动。护理活动从家庭延伸到社区,包括无数的预期和反应措施。父母对孩子的健康和幸福表现出坚定的承诺,同时对他们在朋友、孩子的老师和卫生保健提供者中经历的耻辱做出回应。在面临或预期因选择疫苗而受到惩罚时,父母们向志同道合的同龄人寻求支持,并计划如果惩罚措施变得压倒性,下一步该采取哪些措施。审核注册:PROSPERO CRD42021241781。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Conducting Pairwise and Network Meta-analyses in Updated and Living Systematic Reviews: a Scoping Review Protocol. Effectiveness of Combined Physical and Psychological Interventions on Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Adult Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Systematic Review Protocol. Factors affecting decisions to use antibiotic-sparing treatment approaches in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections: a scoping review protocol. Parent and Carer Experiences of Health Care Professionals' Communications About a Child's Higher Weight: a Qualitative Systematic Review. Methods for data extraction and data transformation in convergent integrated mixed methods systematic reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1