An Integrated Testing Strategy and Online Tool for Assessing Skin Sensitization of Agrochemical Formulations.

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Toxics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.3390/toxics12120936
Hung-Lin Kan, Shan-Shan Wang, Chun-Lin Liao, Wei-Ren Tsai, Chia-Chi Wang, Chun-Wei Tung
{"title":"An Integrated Testing Strategy and Online Tool for Assessing Skin Sensitization of Agrochemical Formulations.","authors":"Hung-Lin Kan, Shan-Shan Wang, Chun-Lin Liao, Wei-Ren Tsai, Chia-Chi Wang, Chun-Wei Tung","doi":"10.3390/toxics12120936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization is a global trend. Recently, scientific efforts have been focused on the integration of multiple evidence for decision making with the publication of OECD Guideline No. 497 for defined approaches to skin sensitization. The integrated testing strategy (ITS) methods reported by the guideline integrates in chemico, in vitro, and in silico testing to assess both hazard and potency of skin sensitization. The incorporation of in silico methods achieved comparable performance with fewer experiments compared to the traditional two-out-of-three (2o3) method. However, the direct application of current ITSs to agrochemicals can be problematic due to the lack of agrochemicals in the training data of the incorporated in silico methods. To address the issue, we present ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0 for agrochemicals and agrochemical formulations using a reconfigured in silico model SkinSensPred for pesticides. Compared to ITSv2, the proposed ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0 achieved an 11% and 16% improvement in the accuracy and correct classification rate for hazard identification and potency classification, respectively. In addition, an online ITS tool was implemented and available on the SkinSensDB website. The tool is expected to be useful for evaluating skin sensitization of substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization is a global trend. Recently, scientific efforts have been focused on the integration of multiple evidence for decision making with the publication of OECD Guideline No. 497 for defined approaches to skin sensitization. The integrated testing strategy (ITS) methods reported by the guideline integrates in chemico, in vitro, and in silico testing to assess both hazard and potency of skin sensitization. The incorporation of in silico methods achieved comparable performance with fewer experiments compared to the traditional two-out-of-three (2o3) method. However, the direct application of current ITSs to agrochemicals can be problematic due to the lack of agrochemicals in the training data of the incorporated in silico methods. To address the issue, we present ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0 for agrochemicals and agrochemical formulations using a reconfigured in silico model SkinSensPred for pesticides. Compared to ITSv2, the proposed ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0 achieved an 11% and 16% improvement in the accuracy and correct classification rate for hazard identification and potency classification, respectively. In addition, an online ITS tool was implemented and available on the SkinSensDB website. The tool is expected to be useful for evaluating skin sensitization of substances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估农药配方皮肤致敏性的综合测试策略和在线工具。
非动物皮肤致敏性评估是一种全球趋势。最近,随着经合组织指南第497号关于确定皮肤致敏方法的出版,科学努力已集中在决策的多种证据的整合上。该指南报告的综合测试策略(ITS)方法整合了化学、体外和计算机测试,以评估皮肤致敏的危害和效力。与传统的三分之二(2o3)方法相比,集成硅方法通过较少的实验获得了相当的性能。然而,由于集成计算机方法的培训数据中缺乏农用化学品,目前的信息技术系统对农用化学品的直接应用可能存在问题。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了用于农用化学品和农用化学品配方的ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0,使用了用于农药的重新配置的硅模型SkinSensPred。与ITSv2相比,提出的ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0在危害识别和效价分类的准确率和正确率上分别提高了11%和16%。此外,还实现了一个在线ITS工具,并可在SkinSensDB网站上使用。该工具有望用于评估物质的皮肤致敏性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Di Paola et al. Environmental Risk Assessment of Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate and Tocilizumab Mixture in Zebrafish Early Life Stage (Danio rerio). Toxics 2022, 10, 279. RETRACTED: Paola et al. Environmental Impact of Pharmaceutical Pollutants: Synergistic Toxicity of Ivermectin and Cypermethrin. Toxics 2022, 10, 388. RETRACTED: Di Paola et al. Combined Effects of Potassium Perchlorate and a Neonicotinoid on Zebrafish Larvae (Danio rerio). Toxics 2022, 10, 203. Human Activity as a Growing Threat to Marine Ecosystems: Plastic and Temperature Effects on the Sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus. Subchronic Exposure to Low-Dose Chlorfenapyr and Emamectin Benzoate Disrupts Kidney Metabolism in Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1