Neurological Soft Signs in Type I Bipolar Disorder and Bipolar Spectrum Patients and Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70341
Seyed Saeed Sadr, Seyed Mehdi Samimi-Ardestani, Yousef Semnani, Narges Adel, Faezeh Tajari, Nastaran Samani
{"title":"Neurological Soft Signs in Type I Bipolar Disorder and Bipolar Spectrum Patients and Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Seyed Saeed Sadr, Seyed Mehdi Samimi-Ardestani, Yousef Semnani, Narges Adel, Faezeh Tajari, Nastaran Samani","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare neurological soft signs (NSSs) in type 1 bipolar disorder (BD), bipolar spectrum (BS) patients, and their unaffected first-degree relatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study involved participants referred to the Psychiatric Department of Imam Hossein Hospital. Five groups (<i>n</i> = 25): patients with type 1 BD, patients with BS, unaffected first-degree relatives of the two groups, and a control group were evaluated using the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that patients with bipolar I disorder had the highest NES scores, with significant group differences (<i>F</i>(4.120) = 10.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The Bonferroni correction identified bipolar I patients as the primary source of this difference, while other groups did not significantly differ. ANCOVA showed that age (<i>F</i>(1.123) = 3.92, <i>p</i> = 0.052) and gender (<i>F</i>(1.123) = 0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.75) had no significant influence on NES scores. However, all four NES subsets significantly contributed to the overall score, except for the sensory subset. Differences were significant between bipolar I patients and most other groups, except the BS group, which showed no significant differences from the rest. No correlation was found with age, gender, or age of disease onset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The higher NSS severity in type I BD compared to BS and control groups highlights its potential link to the genetic and neurodevelopmental differences in BD type I. Further research is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"e70341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: This study aimed to compare neurological soft signs (NSSs) in type 1 bipolar disorder (BD), bipolar spectrum (BS) patients, and their unaffected first-degree relatives.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study involved participants referred to the Psychiatric Department of Imam Hossein Hospital. Five groups (n = 25): patients with type 1 BD, patients with BS, unaffected first-degree relatives of the two groups, and a control group were evaluated using the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES).

Results: The analysis revealed that patients with bipolar I disorder had the highest NES scores, with significant group differences (F(4.120) = 10.36, p < 0.001). The Bonferroni correction identified bipolar I patients as the primary source of this difference, while other groups did not significantly differ. ANCOVA showed that age (F(1.123) = 3.92, p = 0.052) and gender (F(1.123) = 0.1, p = 0.75) had no significant influence on NES scores. However, all four NES subsets significantly contributed to the overall score, except for the sensory subset. Differences were significant between bipolar I patients and most other groups, except the BS group, which showed no significant differences from the rest. No correlation was found with age, gender, or age of disease onset.

Conclusion: The higher NSS severity in type I BD compared to BS and control groups highlights its potential link to the genetic and neurodevelopmental differences in BD type I. Further research is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
I型双相情感障碍和双相情感谱系患者及其未受影响的一级亲属的神经系统软症状:一项横断面研究。
背景与目的:本研究旨在比较1型双相情感障碍(BD)、双相情感谱系(BS)患者及其未受影响的一级亲属的神经系统软体征(nss)。方法:这项描述性横断面研究涉及到伊玛目侯赛因医院精神科的参与者。采用神经学评估量表(NES)对1型BD患者、BS患者、两组未受影响的一级亲属和对照组进行评估,共5组(n = 25)。结果:分析显示双相I型障碍患者的NES评分最高,组间差异有统计学意义(F(4.120) = 10.36, p (1.123) = 3.92, p = 0.052),性别(F(1.123) = 0.1, p = 0.75)对NES评分无显著影响。然而,除了感觉子集外,所有四个NES子集都对总分有显著贡献。双相I型患者与大多数其他组之间存在显著差异,但BS组与其他组无显著差异。未发现与年龄、性别或发病年龄相关。结论:与BS组和对照组相比,I型BD患者NSS严重程度较高,这表明其可能与I型BD的遗传和神经发育差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biosafety Management Practices Among Clinical Laboratory Professionals in Debre Berhan Town Governmental Hospitals, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Gastrointestinal Parasites With Their Risk Factors in Tharu Indigenous People in Southern Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. Enhancing Vaccine Uptake Among Persons With Disabilities: Insights From Ghana and Implications for the Philippines. (South-)West to (North-)East Directional Movement of Respiratory Virus Activity in Europe: A Spatial-Temporal Cross-Sectional Study. Knowledge and Awareness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1