SAHD-10: Development and initial validation of a short version of the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death based on a large multinational sample.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Palliative & Supportive Care Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1017/S1478951524001524
Kerstin Kremeike, Kathleen Boström, Thomas Dojan, Cristina Montforte-Royo, Barry Rosenfeld, Raymond Voltz, Christian Rietz, Julia Strupp
{"title":"SAHD-10: Development and initial validation of a short version of the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death based on a large multinational sample.","authors":"Kerstin Kremeike, Kathleen Boström, Thomas Dojan, Cristina Montforte-Royo, Barry Rosenfeld, Raymond Voltz, Christian Rietz, Julia Strupp","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Wishes to hasten death (WTHDs) are common in patients with serious illness. The Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD) is a validated 20-item instrument for measuring WTHD. Two short versions have also been developed based on statistical item selection. However, all existing versions show some limitations with potential for improvement. This study aims to develop and initially validate a theory-driven and statistically sound SAHD short version based on a large multinational sample to advance the WTHD assessment in different countries and with different legislations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-step procedure was carried out including (1) theory-driven item selection, (2) exploratory, and (3) confirmatory factor analysis. We used a data set collected between 1998 and 2020 across 3 different countries (Germany, Spain, USA). Participants were <i>N</i> = 1156 complete cases (<i>n</i> = 181 German, <i>n</i> = 101 Spanish and <i>n</i> = 874 US) of severely ill adult in- and outpatients. They had to be ≥18 years and give informed consent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis revealed that 10 of 11 items previously selected theory-driven loaded on either of 2 factors: (1) WTHD and (2) internal locus of control. These factors showed good to excellent reliability according to Cronbach's α and McDonald's Ω, as well as an excellent fit of our data as an overall model for the total sample.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The developed SAHD-10 represents a reliable and valid alternative to the SAHD and an efficient means to measure and further investigate a WTHD in cross-cultural clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Wishes to hasten death (WTHDs) are common in patients with serious illness. The Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD) is a validated 20-item instrument for measuring WTHD. Two short versions have also been developed based on statistical item selection. However, all existing versions show some limitations with potential for improvement. This study aims to develop and initially validate a theory-driven and statistically sound SAHD short version based on a large multinational sample to advance the WTHD assessment in different countries and with different legislations.

Methods: A 3-step procedure was carried out including (1) theory-driven item selection, (2) exploratory, and (3) confirmatory factor analysis. We used a data set collected between 1998 and 2020 across 3 different countries (Germany, Spain, USA). Participants were N = 1156 complete cases (n = 181 German, n = 101 Spanish and n = 874 US) of severely ill adult in- and outpatients. They had to be ≥18 years and give informed consent.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis revealed that 10 of 11 items previously selected theory-driven loaded on either of 2 factors: (1) WTHD and (2) internal locus of control. These factors showed good to excellent reliability according to Cronbach's α and McDonald's Ω, as well as an excellent fit of our data as an overall model for the total sample.

Significance of results: The developed SAHD-10 represents a reliable and valid alternative to the SAHD and an efficient means to measure and further investigate a WTHD in cross-cultural clinical and research settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SAHD-10:基于大型多国样本的对加速死亡态度表的简短版本的开发和初步验证。
目的:希望加速死亡(WTHDs)在重病患者中很常见。加速死亡态度表(SAHD)是一个经过验证的用于测量加速死亡意愿的 20 个项目的工具。在统计项目选择的基础上,还开发了两个简短版本。然而,所有现有版本都存在一些局限性,有待改进。本研究旨在基于大量跨国样本,开发并初步验证一个以理论为导向、统计上合理的SAHD简易版,以推进不同国家和不同立法下的WTHD评估:我们采用了三步程序,包括:(1)理论驱动的项目选择;(2)探索性因素分析;(3)确认性因素分析。我们使用了 1998 年至 2020 年期间在 3 个不同国家(德国、西班牙和美国)收集的数据集。参与者包括 1156 个完整病例(德国 181 个,西班牙 101 个,美国 874 个)的重症成年住院和门诊患者。他们必须年满 18 岁,并在知情的情况下表示同意:探索性因子分析显示,在之前选定的理论驱动的 11 个项目中,有 10 个负载于 2 个因子中的任何一个:(1) WTHD 和 (2) 内部控制。根据Cronbach's α和McDonald's Ω,这些因子显示出良好到极佳的可靠性,而且我们的数据作为一个整体模型与所有样本的拟合度也很高:所开发的SAHD-10是SAHD的一种可靠有效的替代方法,也是在跨文化临床和研究环境中测量和进一步研究WTHD的一种有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
期刊最新文献
Promising results of a resource- and activity-oriented intervention integrating rehabilitation into palliative care in people with advanced cancer: A feasibility study testing outcome measures. Sharing "off-script": A qualitative analysis of providers' empathic self-disclosures during dignity therapy. Evaluating the acceptability of a self-directed, self-management intervention for patients and caregivers facing advanced cancer. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for advance care planning in older people: A COSMIN systematic review. Emotional ecosystems: Understanding the relationship between family interactions and anxiety among cancer caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1