Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Silicone-Based Putty Reline Impressions with Different Spacer Acquisition Techniques in Fixed Partial Dentures.
Abdulelah Sameer Sindi, Hanan Salem A Otudi, Asma Ahmed A Muslihi, Roaa Abdu Althurwi, Mohammed E Sayed, Bandar M A Al-Makramani, Fuad A Al-Sanabani, Mohammad Abker Ahmed Ageel, Sultan A Y Jawbahi, Lakshya Kumar, Saeed Awod Bin Hassan, Ahmed Abdullah Al Malwi, Sultan Mohammed Kaleem, Khurshid Mattoo
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Silicone-Based Putty Reline Impressions with Different Spacer Acquisition Techniques in Fixed Partial Dentures.","authors":"Abdulelah Sameer Sindi, Hanan Salem A Otudi, Asma Ahmed A Muslihi, Roaa Abdu Althurwi, Mohammed E Sayed, Bandar M A Al-Makramani, Fuad A Al-Sanabani, Mohammad Abker Ahmed Ageel, Sultan A Y Jawbahi, Lakshya Kumar, Saeed Awod Bin Hassan, Ahmed Abdullah Al Malwi, Sultan Mohammed Kaleem, Khurshid Mattoo","doi":"10.12659/MSM.946537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND A tooth preparation's clinical requirements and geometric configurations should take precedence over material characteristics when advocating for putty reline impression techniques for permanent restorations, since they require a technically sensitive spacer for light body elastomer. We evaluated the linear dimensional accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane-based putty reline impressions with different spacer acquisition techniques in short-span and long-span fixed partial dentures (FPD). MATERIAL AND METHODS A typodont tooth set simulated a 3-unit (short-span) and a 5-unit (long-span) FPD. Between respective prepared abutments, 31 coordinates were identified and measured based on angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat). Sixty impressions (dual stage 2-step putty reline technique) were divided into 5 groups (n=12/group): group PP (pre-preparation putty), group GP (gouging putty), group PS (polythene spacer), group CT (conventional temporary), and group MT (modified temporary), depending on spacer acquisition method. Coordinates measurements were conducted using a measuring microscope. Descriptive and inferential statistical tests (ANOVA, post hoc Tukey) determined between-group and within-group differences, at P≤0.05 significance level. RESULTS In short-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were GP (4 coordinates), PP (2 coordinates), and PS, CT, and MT (1 each). In long-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were group GP (12 coordinates), group PP (10 coordinates), group PS (5 coordinates), and group CT and group MT (4 each). CONCLUSIONS Different spacer acquisition methods produce varied thickness of spacers for relining of putty. CT and MT, when used as spacers, provided maximum accurate coordinates for angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat).</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"31 ","pages":"e946537"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.946537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND A tooth preparation's clinical requirements and geometric configurations should take precedence over material characteristics when advocating for putty reline impression techniques for permanent restorations, since they require a technically sensitive spacer for light body elastomer. We evaluated the linear dimensional accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane-based putty reline impressions with different spacer acquisition techniques in short-span and long-span fixed partial dentures (FPD). MATERIAL AND METHODS A typodont tooth set simulated a 3-unit (short-span) and a 5-unit (long-span) FPD. Between respective prepared abutments, 31 coordinates were identified and measured based on angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat). Sixty impressions (dual stage 2-step putty reline technique) were divided into 5 groups (n=12/group): group PP (pre-preparation putty), group GP (gouging putty), group PS (polythene spacer), group CT (conventional temporary), and group MT (modified temporary), depending on spacer acquisition method. Coordinates measurements were conducted using a measuring microscope. Descriptive and inferential statistical tests (ANOVA, post hoc Tukey) determined between-group and within-group differences, at P≤0.05 significance level. RESULTS In short-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were GP (4 coordinates), PP (2 coordinates), and PS, CT, and MT (1 each). In long-span FPD, compared with control, the number of significantly different coordinates group-wise were group GP (12 coordinates), group PP (10 coordinates), group PS (5 coordinates), and group CT and group MT (4 each). CONCLUSIONS Different spacer acquisition methods produce varied thickness of spacers for relining of putty. CT and MT, when used as spacers, provided maximum accurate coordinates for angles (line/point) and surfaces (curved/flat).
当提倡永久修复的腻子线印模技术时,牙齿准备的临床要求和几何结构应该优先于材料特性,因为它们需要技术上敏感的轻体弹性体垫片。我们评估了乙烯基聚硅氧烷基腻子线印模在短跨和长跨固定局部义齿(FPD)中的线性尺寸精度。材料和方法一套排字齿模拟了3单元(短跨度)和5单元(长跨度)FPD。在各自制备的基台之间,根据角度(线/点)和表面(曲面/平面)识别和测量31个坐标。60个印模(双阶段2步腻子线技术)分为5组(n=12/组):PP组(预制备腻子)、GP组(刨削腻子)、PS组(聚乙烯垫片)、CT组(常规临时)和MT组(改良临时),具体取决于垫片获取方法。利用测量显微镜进行坐标测量。描述性和推断性统计检验(ANOVA, post hoc Tukey)确定组间和组内差异,P≤0.05显著性水平。结果短跨度FPD组与对照组相比,组间差异显著的坐标数为GP(4个坐标)、PP(2个坐标),PS、CT、MT各1个坐标。在大跨度FPD中,与对照组相比,GP组(12个坐标)、PP组(10个坐标)、PS组(5个坐标)、CT组和MT组(各4个坐标)的组间坐标差异显著。结论不同的垫片获取方法导致腻子衬里垫片厚度不同。CT和MT用作间隔器时,可提供角度(线/点)和表面(弯曲/平坦)的最精确坐标。
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.