Frailism: a scoping review exploring discrimination against people living with frailty.

IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Lancet Healthy Longevity Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100651
Philip Braude, Emma Grace Lewis, Steve Broach Kc, Edward Carlton, Sarah Rudd, Jean Palmer, Richard Walker, Ben Carter, Jonathan Benger
{"title":"Frailism: a scoping review exploring discrimination against people living with frailty.","authors":"Philip Braude, Emma Grace Lewis, Steve Broach Kc, Edward Carlton, Sarah Rudd, Jean Palmer, Richard Walker, Ben Carter, Jonathan Benger","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People living with frailty can experience discrimination, but unlike the characteristics of age and disability, frailty is not protected by law. Frailty is a clinical syndrome associated with ageing in which health deficits increase a person's vulnerability to illness, disability, and death. This scoping review, conducted by a team of methodologists, clinicians, lawyers, and patients, aimed to investigate the extent of discrimination against people living with frailty described in health-care literature. We searched five health-care databases from inception up to June, 2022, and grey literature, to identify 144 texts. The texts were classified by the types of discrimination (direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation) and inductively developed into contextual themes. The median age of the participants was 77 years (IQR 69·9-82·0), and 65·4% were women. The most common types of discrimination were direct (in 90 [63%]), indirect (in 66 [46%]), and harassment (in one [1%]) of the 144 texts, with no instances of victimisation reported. Nine themes of discriminatory actions were developed. Discrimination against people living with frailty overlapped with discrimination based on established protected characteristics, including age, disability, race, and sex. Evidence indicated that frailty discrimination replaces, mediates, masks, and potentiates age discrimination. Discrimination against people with frailty seemed to be both an independent event and one that interacts with established protected characteristics. Future research should focus on preventing frailty-based discrimination and establishing whether frailty should be considered a new protected characteristic by law.</p>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":" ","pages":"100651"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People living with frailty can experience discrimination, but unlike the characteristics of age and disability, frailty is not protected by law. Frailty is a clinical syndrome associated with ageing in which health deficits increase a person's vulnerability to illness, disability, and death. This scoping review, conducted by a team of methodologists, clinicians, lawyers, and patients, aimed to investigate the extent of discrimination against people living with frailty described in health-care literature. We searched five health-care databases from inception up to June, 2022, and grey literature, to identify 144 texts. The texts were classified by the types of discrimination (direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimisation) and inductively developed into contextual themes. The median age of the participants was 77 years (IQR 69·9-82·0), and 65·4% were women. The most common types of discrimination were direct (in 90 [63%]), indirect (in 66 [46%]), and harassment (in one [1%]) of the 144 texts, with no instances of victimisation reported. Nine themes of discriminatory actions were developed. Discrimination against people living with frailty overlapped with discrimination based on established protected characteristics, including age, disability, race, and sex. Evidence indicated that frailty discrimination replaces, mediates, masks, and potentiates age discrimination. Discrimination against people with frailty seemed to be both an independent event and one that interacts with established protected characteristics. Future research should focus on preventing frailty-based discrimination and establishing whether frailty should be considered a new protected characteristic by law.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脆弱主义:一篇探讨对脆弱人群歧视的范围审查。
体弱者可能会受到歧视,但与年龄和残疾特征不同,体弱不受法律保护。虚弱是一种与衰老相关的临床综合症,在这种情况下,健康缺陷会增加一个人患病、残疾和死亡的可能性。由方法论专家、临床医生、律师和患者组成的团队进行了此次范围界定审查,旨在调查医疗保健文献中描述的对体弱患者的歧视程度。我们检索了从开始到 2022 年 6 月的五个医疗保健数据库以及灰色文献,确定了 144 篇文献。这些文献按照歧视的类型(直接歧视、间接歧视、骚扰和伤害)进行了分类,并归纳出了相关主题。参与者的年龄中位数为 77 岁(IQR 69-9-82-0),65-4% 为女性。在 144 篇文本中,最常见的歧视类型是直接歧视(90 篇 [63%])、间接歧视(66 篇 [46%])和骚扰(1 篇 [1%]),没有受害情况的报告。共形成了九个歧视行为主题。对体弱者的歧视与基于年龄、残疾、种族和性别等既定受保护特征的歧视重叠。有证据表明,体弱歧视会取代、调解、掩盖和加剧年龄歧视。对体弱者的歧视似乎既是一个独立事件,又与既定的受保护特征相互作用。未来的研究应侧重于防止基于体弱的歧视,并确定法律是否应将体弱视为一种新的受保护特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
期刊最新文献
Merits of the social return on investment methodology for assessing the value of palliative care programmes. Risk prediction for health outcomes in type 2 diabetes: utility of a polysocial risk score? Health needs of older people and age-inclusive health care in humanitarian emergencies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Assessment and management of frailty in individuals living with dementia: expert recommendations for clinical practice. Frailism: a scoping review exploring discrimination against people living with frailty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1