Can Erector Spinae Plane Block Replace Intrathecal Morphine in Cesarean Section? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Opioid Consumption.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Clinical Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001274
Betul Yusra Sirin, Gulsen Teomete, Beliz Bilgili
{"title":"Can Erector Spinae Plane Block Replace Intrathecal Morphine in Cesarean Section? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Opioid Consumption.","authors":"Betul Yusra Sirin, Gulsen Teomete, Beliz Bilgili","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>After cesarean, optimal analgesia is important for early mobilization, mitigating thromboembolic risks, and mother-infant communication. Our study compared the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two patients were randomized into ESPB and ITM groups. Both groups received spinal anesthesia with 10 mg of heavy bupivacaine. In the ITM group, ITM (100 mcg) was added. The ESPB group received bilateral T10 level ESPB with 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine postoperatively. Postoperative pain control included intravenous paracetamol 4x1 g, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, and diclofenac 75 mg for rescue analgesia when Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) >4. NRS, tramadol consumption, and side effects were recorded 24 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome of this study is to compare 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption after cesarean sections. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesia needs, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS scores ≤4 at all time intervals and were comparable among groups. The total 24-hour tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the ESPB group (median: 75; Q1, Q3 [40, 140]) compared with ITM (50 [27.5, 60], P = 0.008). Tramadol consumption was similar among groups during 0 to 6 and 6 to 12 hours. In the 12 to 24 hours, tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the ESPB group (22.5 [15, 57.5]) compared with ITM (15 [12.5, 25], P = 0.005). In the ITM group, nausea and vomiting were observed in 3 patients and itching in 1 patient; no adverse effects were observed in the patients in the ESPB group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, ITM reduced opioid consumption more effectively than ESPB. ESPB is not recommended as a primary analgesic option for cesarean sections.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: After cesarean, optimal analgesia is important for early mobilization, mitigating thromboembolic risks, and mother-infant communication. Our study compared the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

Methods: Eighty-two patients were randomized into ESPB and ITM groups. Both groups received spinal anesthesia with 10 mg of heavy bupivacaine. In the ITM group, ITM (100 mcg) was added. The ESPB group received bilateral T10 level ESPB with 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine postoperatively. Postoperative pain control included intravenous paracetamol 4x1 g, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, and diclofenac 75 mg for rescue analgesia when Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) >4. NRS, tramadol consumption, and side effects were recorded 24 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome of this study is to compare 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption after cesarean sections. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesia needs, and side effects.

Results: NRS scores ≤4 at all time intervals and were comparable among groups. The total 24-hour tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the ESPB group (median: 75; Q1, Q3 [40, 140]) compared with ITM (50 [27.5, 60], P = 0.008). Tramadol consumption was similar among groups during 0 to 6 and 6 to 12 hours. In the 12 to 24 hours, tramadol consumption was significantly higher in the ESPB group (22.5 [15, 57.5]) compared with ITM (15 [12.5, 25], P = 0.005). In the ITM group, nausea and vomiting were observed in 3 patients and itching in 1 patient; no adverse effects were observed in the patients in the ESPB group.

Conclusion: For patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, ITM reduced opioid consumption more effectively than ESPB. ESPB is not recommended as a primary analgesic option for cesarean sections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产术中直立者脊柱平面阻滞能代替鞘内吗啡吗?阿片类药物消费的前瞻性随机对照研究。
目的:剖宫产后,最佳镇痛对早期活动,减轻血栓栓塞风险和母婴沟通是重要的。本研究旨在比较脊髓麻醉下鞘内吗啡(ITM)与竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在择期剖宫产术中的镇痛效果。方法:82例患者随机分为ESPB组和ITM组。两组均给予10 mg重布比卡因脊髓麻醉。ITM组给予鞘内吗啡100 mcg。ESPB组患者术后给予双侧T10水平ESPB加0.25%布比卡因20 ml。术后疼痛控制包括静脉注射扑热息痛4x1gr,静脉曲马多患者自控镇痛,双氯芬酸75mg抢救镇痛,NRS bb0 4。术后24小时记录NRS、曲马多用量及副作用。本研究的主要结果是比较剖宫产术后24小时阿片类药物的消耗。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、抢救性镇痛需求和潜在副作用。结果:NRS评分各时间间隔均≤4分,组间具有可比性。ESPB组24小时曲马多总消耗量显著增高(中位数:75;Q1,Q3[40,140])与ITM相比(50 [27.5,60],P = 0.008)。0-6小时和6-12小时各组曲马多用量相似。在12-24小时内,ESPB组(22.5[15,57.5])明显高于ITM组(15 [12.5,25],P = 0.005)。ITM组恶心、呕吐3例,瘙痒1例;ESPB组未见不良反应。讨论:剖宫产患者在脊髓麻醉下,鞘内吗啡比ESPB更有效地减少阿片类药物的消耗。ESPB不推荐作为剖宫产的主要镇痛选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
An Interdisciplinary Young Adult Pain Rehabilitation Program: Initial Outcomes Supporting Effectiveness. Predicting Non-Response to Multicomponent Treatment in Fibromyalgia: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model. Complications Associated With Use of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators for Pain Management. Amnesia-Related Bias in Sedation Research: Implications for Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Ablation. Letter to the Editor Regarding: Dexmedetomidine Versus Magnesium Sulfate in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Bi-Level Erector Spinae Plane Block in Corrective Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1