Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235
Ke Mo, Weirong Kong, Jiaxin Chen, Shuhua Zhao, Qianqian Zhu
Objectives: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has proven efficacy and is an important component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The external oblique intercostal (EOI) block can provide a dermatomal sensory blockade of T6 to T10 using an anterior axillary line injection. The bilateral rectus sheath (RS) block can significantly reduce early postoperative pain caused by umbilical or periumbilical incisions. The current study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacies of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (UG-TAP) combined with the RS block and ultrasound-guided EOI (UG-EOI) combined with the RS block for LC.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to TAP or EOI group. Patients in TAP group received UG-TAP combined with an RS block. Patients in EOI group received UG-EOI combined with an RS block. The primary outcome was postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption.
Results: A total of 49 patients were included in the final analysis. The postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption in the EOI group was significantly lower than that in the TAP group (9.79±10.22 vs. 18.67±12.58 µg; P [noninferiority] <0.01; noninferiority confirmed). Fewer patients in the EOI versus TAP group had a numerical rating score of >3 during motion. Furthermore, the mean postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption was lower in the EOI versus TAP group (11.54±11.70 vs. 23.04±17.10 µg; P =0.01). The mean postoperative 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 score was higher in the EOI versus TAP group (135.21±4.40 vs. 131.91±5.11; P =0.02).
Discussion: These findings suggest that UG-EOI combined with an RS block was superior to UG-TAP combined with an RS block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing LC.
目的:腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞的疗效已得到证实,是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)多模式镇痛的重要组成部分。外斜肋间(EOI)阻滞可通过腋窝前线注射为 T6-T10 提供皮肤感觉阻滞。双侧直肠鞘(RS)阻滞可显著减轻脐部或脐周切口引起的术后早期疼痛。本研究旨在比较超声引导下肋下 TAP(UG-TAP)联合 RS 阻滞和超声引导下 EOI(UG-EOI)联合 RS 阻滞治疗 LC 的镇痛效果:患者被随机分配到TAP组或EOI组。TAP组患者接受UG-TAP联合RS阻滞治疗。EOI 组患者接受 UG-EOI 联合 RS 阻滞。主要结果是术后 24 小时舒芬太尼消耗量:结果:共有 49 名患者被纳入最终分析。EOI组术后24小时舒芬太尼消耗量明显低于TAP组(9.79±10.22 µg vs. 18.67±12.58 µg;p(非劣效)3)。此外,EOI 组术后 48 小时平均舒芬太尼消耗量低于 TAP 组(11.54±11.70 µg vs. 23.04±17.10 µg;P=0.01)。EOI组与TAP组相比,术后24小时平均恢复质量-15评分更高(135.21±4.40 vs. 131.91±5.11;P=0.02):讨论:这些研究结果表明,UG-EOI联合RS阻滞在LC术后疼痛控制方面优于UG-TAP联合RS阻滞。
{"title":"Preoperative Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Noninferior Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ke Mo, Weirong Kong, Jiaxin Chen, Shuhua Zhao, Qianqian Zhu","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has proven efficacy and is an important component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The external oblique intercostal (EOI) block can provide a dermatomal sensory blockade of T6 to T10 using an anterior axillary line injection. The bilateral rectus sheath (RS) block can significantly reduce early postoperative pain caused by umbilical or periumbilical incisions. The current study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacies of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (UG-TAP) combined with the RS block and ultrasound-guided EOI (UG-EOI) combined with the RS block for LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to TAP or EOI group. Patients in TAP group received UG-TAP combined with an RS block. Patients in EOI group received UG-EOI combined with an RS block. The primary outcome was postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 patients were included in the final analysis. The postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption in the EOI group was significantly lower than that in the TAP group (9.79±10.22 vs. 18.67±12.58 µg; P [noninferiority] <0.01; noninferiority confirmed). Fewer patients in the EOI versus TAP group had a numerical rating score of >3 during motion. Furthermore, the mean postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption was lower in the EOI versus TAP group (11.54±11.70 vs. 23.04±17.10 µg; P =0.01). The mean postoperative 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 score was higher in the EOI versus TAP group (135.21±4.40 vs. 131.91±5.11; P =0.02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that UG-EOI combined with an RS block was superior to UG-TAP combined with an RS block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141794029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-25DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001250
Karin Steere, Dale J Langford, Sean M Collins, Bini Litwin
Objectives: Chronic pain disorders are among the most common and affect approximately 20% of the US population, leading to disproportionately high medical expenditures and negative economic impact. Behavioral factors of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice are associated with pain intensity in chronic pain. Diminished heart rate variability (HRV) is also strongly associated with chronic pain. These factors have been less explored earlier in the pain experience and it is unclear whether they play a role in the transition from acute to chronic pain. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, pain intensity and HRV in naturally occurring acute pain.
Methods: Ninety-seven subjects were recruited from local outpatient physical therapy clinics. Seated HRV was captured on ninety-four subjects via Polar chest strap while subjects were taking a survey via iPad. In addition to sociodemographic data, the survey included the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The natural log of high frequency power (lnHFP) HRV was used in the statistical analysis.
Results: Multiple regression modeling revealed that lower pain catastrophizing, higher perceived injustice, and lower pain intensity were associated with lower HRV, and accounted for 11.4% of the variance in HRV.
Discussion: While greater chronic pain intensity is associated with lower HRV, the relationship is reversed in the setting of acute pain. These findings highlight the need to better understand the unique factors that contribute to lower HRV in the acute phase.
{"title":"The Relationship of Pain Intensity, Perceived Injustice, and Pain Catastrophizing to Heart Rate Variability In Naturally Occurring Acute Pain.","authors":"Karin Steere, Dale J Langford, Sean M Collins, Bini Litwin","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain disorders are among the most common and affect approximately 20% of the US population, leading to disproportionately high medical expenditures and negative economic impact. Behavioral factors of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice are associated with pain intensity in chronic pain. Diminished heart rate variability (HRV) is also strongly associated with chronic pain. These factors have been less explored earlier in the pain experience and it is unclear whether they play a role in the transition from acute to chronic pain. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, pain intensity and HRV in naturally occurring acute pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-seven subjects were recruited from local outpatient physical therapy clinics. Seated HRV was captured on ninety-four subjects via Polar chest strap while subjects were taking a survey via iPad. In addition to sociodemographic data, the survey included the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The natural log of high frequency power (lnHFP) HRV was used in the statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple regression modeling revealed that lower pain catastrophizing, higher perceived injustice, and lower pain intensity were associated with lower HRV, and accounted for 11.4% of the variance in HRV.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While greater chronic pain intensity is associated with lower HRV, the relationship is reversed in the setting of acute pain. These findings highlight the need to better understand the unique factors that contribute to lower HRV in the acute phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142331746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001249
Narinder P Singh, Jeetinder Kaur Makkar, Ira Dhawan, Neha Singh, Preet M Singh, Naveed Siddiqui
Objectives: Both superficial (s) and deep (d) serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks are effective for anterior chest wall surgeries, but there is little clarity on which is more effective. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCT) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of the two approaches for SAP block after anterior chest wall surgery.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials for eligible RCTs from inception until August 2023. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period. The secondary outcomes included pain scores at various intervals, intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, block-related complications, opioid-related side effects, and patient satisfaction scores. Statistical analysis of the pooled data was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3.
Results: We identified seven RCTs published between 2020 and 2022, enrolling 371 patients (186 in the sSAP block and 187 in the dSAP block). Moderate certainty of evidence suggests that both the approaches (deep and superficial) of SAP block were comparable for 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption with a mean difference (MD) of 3.78 mg (95% CI -1.70 to 9.29; P=0.18; I2=87%). The results of other secondary outcomes were comparable, including resting pain scores with an MD of 0.08 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.43; P=0.67; I2=87%) for early pain and MD of 0.63 (95% CI -1.28 to 0.01; P=0.05; I2=95%) for late pain scores, time to first analgesic request with MD of -0.41 hour (95% CI -1.40 to 0.59; P=0.42; I2=90%), and incidence of PONV (OR, 1.45 (95% CI 0.72 to 2.90; P=0.30; I2=0%).
Discussion: Current evidence does not support the preference for one approach of SAP block over the other for postoperative pain. Based on the available data, we recommend further future trials to determine any differences between these interventions.
目的:表层(s)和深层(d)锯肌前平面(SAP)阻滞对前胸壁手术都很有效,但哪种方法更有效还不清楚。因此,我们对随机对照试验 (RCT) 进行了系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以评估前胸壁手术后两种 SAP 阻滞方法的疗效比较:使用 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials 对从开始到 2023 年 8 月符合条件的 RCT 进行了系统性文献检索。主要结果是术后 24 小时内阿片类药物的消耗量。次要结果包括不同时间间隔的疼痛评分、术中阿片类药物消耗量、首次申请镇痛药的时间、阻滞相关并发症、阿片类药物相关副作用以及患者满意度评分。使用Review Manager 5.3版对汇总数据进行了统计分析:我们确定了在 2020 年至 2022 年间发表的 7 项 RCT,共招募了 371 名患者(186 名患者接受了 sSAP 阻滞治疗,187 名患者接受了 dSAP 阻滞治疗)。中度确定性证据表明,两种 SAP 阻滞方法(深部和浅部)的 24 小时口服吗啡当量消耗量相当,平均差异 (MD) 为 3.78 毫克(95% CI -1.70 至 9.29;P=0.18;I2=87%)。其他次要结果的结果具有可比性,包括静息疼痛评分,早期疼痛的 MD 为 0.08 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.43; P=0.67; I2=87%) ,MD 为 0.63 (95% CI -1.28 to 0.01; P=0.晚期疼痛评分的MD为0.63(95% CI -1.28 to 0.01;P=0.05;I2=95%),首次申请镇痛药时间的MD为-0.41小时(95% CI -1.40 to 0.59;P=0.42;I2=90%),PONV的发生率(OR,1.45(95% CI 0.72 to 2.90;P=0.30;I2=0%):讨论:目前的证据并不支持在术后疼痛治疗中优先选择一种 SAP 阻滞方法。根据现有数据,我们建议今后进一步开展试验,以确定这些干预措施之间是否存在差异。
{"title":"Relative Perioperative Analgesic Efficacy of Superficial Versus Deep Approach of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Anterior Chest Wall Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Narinder P Singh, Jeetinder Kaur Makkar, Ira Dhawan, Neha Singh, Preet M Singh, Naveed Siddiqui","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Both superficial (s) and deep (d) serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks are effective for anterior chest wall surgeries, but there is little clarity on which is more effective. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCT) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of the two approaches for SAP block after anterior chest wall surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Registers of Controlled Trials for eligible RCTs from inception until August 2023. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period. The secondary outcomes included pain scores at various intervals, intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, block-related complications, opioid-related side effects, and patient satisfaction scores. Statistical analysis of the pooled data was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified seven RCTs published between 2020 and 2022, enrolling 371 patients (186 in the sSAP block and 187 in the dSAP block). Moderate certainty of evidence suggests that both the approaches (deep and superficial) of SAP block were comparable for 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption with a mean difference (MD) of 3.78 mg (95% CI -1.70 to 9.29; P=0.18; I2=87%). The results of other secondary outcomes were comparable, including resting pain scores with an MD of 0.08 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.43; P=0.67; I2=87%) for early pain and MD of 0.63 (95% CI -1.28 to 0.01; P=0.05; I2=95%) for late pain scores, time to first analgesic request with MD of -0.41 hour (95% CI -1.40 to 0.59; P=0.42; I2=90%), and incidence of PONV (OR, 1.45 (95% CI 0.72 to 2.90; P=0.30; I2=0%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Current evidence does not support the preference for one approach of SAP block over the other for postoperative pain. Based on the available data, we recommend further future trials to determine any differences between these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142309025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001246
Daniela M Zolezzi, Sebastian Kold, Christina Brock, Anne Birthe Helweg Jensen, Sarah Thorius Jensen, Isabelle Myriam Larsen, Søren Schou Olesen, Carsten Dahl Mørch, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Thomas Graven-Nielsen
Objectives: Non-malignant chronic pain is a clinical challenge because pharmacological treatment often fails to relieve pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a treatment that could have the potential for pain relief and improvement in quality of life. However, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the effects of tDCS on the pain system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 5 days of anodal tDCS treatment on the pain system in chronic non-malignant pain patients using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and quality of life questionnaires: (1) Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf), (2) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-C30), and (3) Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).
Methods: Eleven non-malignant chronic pain patients (51±13.6 years old, 5M) participated in the study. Anodal tDCS was applied for five consecutive days, followed by sham stimulation after a washout period of at least two weeks. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and pain tolerance thresholds (PTT) were assessed in different body regions on days 1 and 5.
Results: Anodal tDCS appeared to maintain PTT at C5 (clavicle) on day 5, but sham stimulation decreased PTT (P=0.007). Additionally, anodal tDCS increased PTT compared to sham at day 5 at Th10 ventral dermatomes (P=0.014). Both anodal and sham tDCS decreased the BPI-sf total and interference scores, and the EORTC-C30 fatigue score, but no interaction effect was observed.
Discussion: This study adds to the evidence in the literature that tDCS may be a potential therapeutic tool for the management of non-malignant chronic pain.
{"title":"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients with Non-Malignant Chronic Pain.","authors":"Daniela M Zolezzi, Sebastian Kold, Christina Brock, Anne Birthe Helweg Jensen, Sarah Thorius Jensen, Isabelle Myriam Larsen, Søren Schou Olesen, Carsten Dahl Mørch, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Thomas Graven-Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Non-malignant chronic pain is a clinical challenge because pharmacological treatment often fails to relieve pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a treatment that could have the potential for pain relief and improvement in quality of life. However, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the effects of tDCS on the pain system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 5 days of anodal tDCS treatment on the pain system in chronic non-malignant pain patients using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and quality of life questionnaires: (1) Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf), (2) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-C30), and (3) Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven non-malignant chronic pain patients (51±13.6 years old, 5M) participated in the study. Anodal tDCS was applied for five consecutive days, followed by sham stimulation after a washout period of at least two weeks. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and pain tolerance thresholds (PTT) were assessed in different body regions on days 1 and 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anodal tDCS appeared to maintain PTT at C5 (clavicle) on day 5, but sham stimulation decreased PTT (P=0.007). Additionally, anodal tDCS increased PTT compared to sham at day 5 at Th10 ventral dermatomes (P=0.014). Both anodal and sham tDCS decreased the BPI-sf total and interference scores, and the EORTC-C30 fatigue score, but no interaction effect was observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study adds to the evidence in the literature that tDCS may be a potential therapeutic tool for the management of non-malignant chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-23DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001248
Jiahui Jin, Huanan Sun, Xinyue Zhang, Xinyi Wu, Xue Pan, Danni Lv, Yi He, Xuezhao Cao
Objectives: This study compares the analgesic efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block (ICNB) under direct thoracoscopic visualization and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) with ultrasound guidance during thoracoscopic surgery's perioperative period. Furthermore, it examines their impact on chronic pain and identifies potential risk factors associated with its development.
Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 74 thoracoscopic surgery patients were randomly assigned to ICNB or SAPB groups. Attending surgeons administered ICNB, while anesthesiologists performed SAPB, both using 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for resting and coughing pain at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, perioperative opioid and NSAID consumption, and chronic pain incidence at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes aimed to identify independent risk factors for chronic pain.
Results: The primary results reveal that SAPB group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores than ICNB group for postoperative coughing at 24 hours (P<0.001, 95% CI=[0.5, 1]) and for resting pain at 48 hours (P=0.001, 95% CI=[0.2, 1]). Conversely, ICNB group demonstrated reduced VAS score for resting pain at 6 hours compared to SAPB group (P=0.014, 95% CI=[-0.5, 0.5]). SAPB group required significantly less intraoperative sulfentanil (P<0.001, 95% CI=[2.5, 5]), remifentanil (P=0.005, 95% CI=[-0.4, -0.1]), and flurbiprofen ester (P=0.003, 95% CI=[0, 50]) than ICNB group. Chronic pain incidence was similar (P=0.572, 95% CI=[0.412, 1.279]), with mild pain in both ICNB and SAPB groups. Secondary findings indicate that resting VAS score at 12 hours (OR=7.59, P=0.048, 95% CI=[1.02, 56.46]), chest tube duration (OR=3.35, P=0.029, 95% CI=[1.13, 9.97]), and surgical duration (OR=1.02, P=0.049, 95% CI=[1.00, 1.03]) were significant predictors of chronic pain occurrence.
Discussion: ICNB and SAPB demonstrated comparable analgesic effects, with similar rates of chronic pain occurrence. Chronic pain independent risk factors included resting VAS score at 12 hours, chest tube duration, and surgical duration.
研究目的本研究比较了胸腔镜手术围手术期在胸腔镜直视下进行肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)和在超声引导下进行肋前神经阻滞(SAPB)的镇痛效果。此外,研究还探讨了它们对慢性疼痛的影响,并确定了与慢性疼痛发生相关的潜在风险因素:在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中,74 名胸腔镜手术患者被随机分配到 ICNB 或 SAPB 组。外科医生主治 ICNB,麻醉师主治 SAPB,均使用 20 mL 0.5% 罗哌卡因。主要结果包括术后6、12、24和48小时静息痛和咳嗽痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、围手术期阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药的消耗量以及术后3个月的慢性疼痛发生率。次要结果旨在确定慢性疼痛的独立风险因素:主要结果显示,SAPB 组术后 24 小时咳嗽的 VAS 评分明显低于 ICNB 组(PD 讨论):ICNB和SAPB的镇痛效果相当,慢性疼痛发生率相似。慢性疼痛的独立风险因素包括 12 小时后的静息 VAS 评分、胸导管持续时间和手术持续时间。
{"title":"Comparison of Intercostal Nerve Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Management and Impact on Chronic Pain in Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jiahui Jin, Huanan Sun, Xinyue Zhang, Xinyi Wu, Xue Pan, Danni Lv, Yi He, Xuezhao Cao","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares the analgesic efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block (ICNB) under direct thoracoscopic visualization and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) with ultrasound guidance during thoracoscopic surgery's perioperative period. Furthermore, it examines their impact on chronic pain and identifies potential risk factors associated with its development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled study, 74 thoracoscopic surgery patients were randomly assigned to ICNB or SAPB groups. Attending surgeons administered ICNB, while anesthesiologists performed SAPB, both using 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for resting and coughing pain at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, perioperative opioid and NSAID consumption, and chronic pain incidence at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes aimed to identify independent risk factors for chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary results reveal that SAPB group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores than ICNB group for postoperative coughing at 24 hours (P<0.001, 95% CI=[0.5, 1]) and for resting pain at 48 hours (P=0.001, 95% CI=[0.2, 1]). Conversely, ICNB group demonstrated reduced VAS score for resting pain at 6 hours compared to SAPB group (P=0.014, 95% CI=[-0.5, 0.5]). SAPB group required significantly less intraoperative sulfentanil (P<0.001, 95% CI=[2.5, 5]), remifentanil (P=0.005, 95% CI=[-0.4, -0.1]), and flurbiprofen ester (P=0.003, 95% CI=[0, 50]) than ICNB group. Chronic pain incidence was similar (P=0.572, 95% CI=[0.412, 1.279]), with mild pain in both ICNB and SAPB groups. Secondary findings indicate that resting VAS score at 12 hours (OR=7.59, P=0.048, 95% CI=[1.02, 56.46]), chest tube duration (OR=3.35, P=0.029, 95% CI=[1.13, 9.97]), and surgical duration (OR=1.02, P=0.049, 95% CI=[1.00, 1.03]) were significant predictors of chronic pain occurrence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ICNB and SAPB demonstrated comparable analgesic effects, with similar rates of chronic pain occurrence. Chronic pain independent risk factors included resting VAS score at 12 hours, chest tube duration, and surgical duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-17DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001247
Josep Roman-Juan, Mark P Jensen, Jordi Miró
Objective: Research has shown that there has been an increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain in adolescents, especially in female adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that the observed increase in the prevalence of early menarche in female adolescents is contributing to the increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain over time in this population.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from 251,390 female adolescents from 27 countries/regions were drawn from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children questionnaire-based surveys conducted in 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014. The Karlson-Holm-Breen method was used to examine the explanatory role of the increase in the prevalence of early menarche on the increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain whilst controlling for socioeconomic status, physical activity, body mass index, and psychological symptoms.
Results: The increase in the prevalence of early menarche between 2002 and 2014 was associated with the increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain (P<0.001). The percent of chronic back pain prevalence increase accounted for by the increase in early menarche was 2.2%.
Conclusions: The increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain in female adolescents observed over the last decade may be explained, in part, by the decrease in the age of menarche. This finding, coupled with research showing a decline in early menarche worldwide, highlights the need to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms of the association between early menarche and pain ‒ particularly chronic back pain ‒ in female adolescents.
{"title":"The Increase in Early Menarche is Associated with the Increase of Chronic Back Pain in Female Adolescents: The HBSC Study 2002-2014.","authors":"Josep Roman-Juan, Mark P Jensen, Jordi Miró","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001247","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research has shown that there has been an increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain in adolescents, especially in female adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that the observed increase in the prevalence of early menarche in female adolescents is contributing to the increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain over time in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from 251,390 female adolescents from 27 countries/regions were drawn from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children questionnaire-based surveys conducted in 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014. The Karlson-Holm-Breen method was used to examine the explanatory role of the increase in the prevalence of early menarche on the increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain whilst controlling for socioeconomic status, physical activity, body mass index, and psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The increase in the prevalence of early menarche between 2002 and 2014 was associated with the increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain (P<0.001). The percent of chronic back pain prevalence increase accounted for by the increase in early menarche was 2.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increase in the prevalence of chronic back pain in female adolescents observed over the last decade may be explained, in part, by the decrease in the age of menarche. This finding, coupled with research showing a decline in early menarche worldwide, highlights the need to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms of the association between early menarche and pain ‒ particularly chronic back pain ‒ in female adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of clinic-based and telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises in individuals with chronic low back pain three months post-treatment.
Methods: Forty-two participants were randomized to either clinic-based or telerehabilitation-based groups, performing exercises three times weekly for eight weeks. Assessments were conducted pre-intervention, post-intervention and one and three months after the intervention. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) for low back pain.
Results: Both exercise approaches were found to be similarly effective in improving pain disability, quality of life (except for emotional response, energy level, sleep, and social isolation), and pain catastrophizing at all follow-up time points. The Visual Analog Scale showed a significant reduction in pain from baseline at all time points in both groups (P<0.001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. Nottingham Health Profile showed significant improvements in physical activity, pain, and total score, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. No significant changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters were observed in either group. According to the post-intervention intention-to-treat analysis, lumbar flexion range of motion showed significant improvements in both groups with small effect sizes.
Discussion: Telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises proved as effective as clinic-based methods in treating chronic low back pain, offering a viable alternative tailored to individual needs and circumstances.
{"title":"Effects of Clinic-Based and Telerehabilitation-Based Motor Control Exercises in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain - A Randomized Controlled Trial with 3-Month Follow-Up.","authors":"Aybüke Fanuscu, Müzeyyen Öz, Yasemin Özel Asliyüce, Egemen Turhan, Özlem Ülger","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of clinic-based and telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises in individuals with chronic low back pain three months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two participants were randomized to either clinic-based or telerehabilitation-based groups, performing exercises three times weekly for eight weeks. Assessments were conducted pre-intervention, post-intervention and one and three months after the intervention. The primary outcome was pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale) for low back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both exercise approaches were found to be similarly effective in improving pain disability, quality of life (except for emotional response, energy level, sleep, and social isolation), and pain catastrophizing at all follow-up time points. The Visual Analog Scale showed a significant reduction in pain from baseline at all time points in both groups (P<0.001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. Nottingham Health Profile showed significant improvements in physical activity, pain, and total score, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to strong. No significant changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters were observed in either group. According to the post-intervention intention-to-treat analysis, lumbar flexion range of motion showed significant improvements in both groups with small effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telerehabilitation-based motor control exercises proved as effective as clinic-based methods in treating chronic low back pain, offering a viable alternative tailored to individual needs and circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001243
Emily Murphy, Tiffany Toor, Sarah Palyo, Sara Librodo, Kathryn Schopmeyer, Alan N Simmons, Irina A Strigo
Objective: This study compares clinical pain outcomes between patients in a pain treatment program that was conducted in-person, compared to a virtual program.
Methods: In-Person (N=127) and Virtual (N=101) pain treatment programs were compared based on patient-reported, practitioner-collected, and medical record data. The patients were measured at baseline and post treatment (week 12 for In-Person and week 8 for Virtual patients). We employed last observation carried forward (LOCF) to handle missing data.
Results: Both the In-Person and Virtual groups were similar in regard to all baseline outcomes, except the In-Person group having significantly more co-morbidities at baseline, with particularly more cases of mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental diseases. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in the pain-related measurements of pain interference and pain catastrophizing thoughts, but neither group displayed a change in average pain across treatment. Further, both groups improved significantly on emotional well-being scores, but not on physical functioning scores. No significant differences existed between groups on outcomes, except for pain catastrophizing, which was higher in the Virtual group at both time points. The Virtual group had lower rates of dropouts compared to In-Person, while the In-Person group had a larger proportion reach a clinically meaningful change in pain-related outcomes, defined as a >30% improvement.
Discussion: While some changes were unique to the In-Person program, overall, patients in the Virtual program achieved similar treatment outcomes, suggesting that it can successfully treat Veterans seeking pain management, with less need for in-person facilities for both patients and clinicians.
{"title":"Comparing Pain Outcomes and Treatment Adherence Between In-Person and Virtual Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs at the San Francisco VA Health Care System.","authors":"Emily Murphy, Tiffany Toor, Sarah Palyo, Sara Librodo, Kathryn Schopmeyer, Alan N Simmons, Irina A Strigo","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001243","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares clinical pain outcomes between patients in a pain treatment program that was conducted in-person, compared to a virtual program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-Person (N=127) and Virtual (N=101) pain treatment programs were compared based on patient-reported, practitioner-collected, and medical record data. The patients were measured at baseline and post treatment (week 12 for In-Person and week 8 for Virtual patients). We employed last observation carried forward (LOCF) to handle missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the In-Person and Virtual groups were similar in regard to all baseline outcomes, except the In-Person group having significantly more co-morbidities at baseline, with particularly more cases of mental, behavioral, or neurodevelopmental diseases. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in the pain-related measurements of pain interference and pain catastrophizing thoughts, but neither group displayed a change in average pain across treatment. Further, both groups improved significantly on emotional well-being scores, but not on physical functioning scores. No significant differences existed between groups on outcomes, except for pain catastrophizing, which was higher in the Virtual group at both time points. The Virtual group had lower rates of dropouts compared to In-Person, while the In-Person group had a larger proportion reach a clinically meaningful change in pain-related outcomes, defined as a >30% improvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While some changes were unique to the In-Person program, overall, patients in the Virtual program achieved similar treatment outcomes, suggesting that it can successfully treat Veterans seeking pain management, with less need for in-person facilities for both patients and clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: Researchers suggested that the interruptive effects of chronic pain on cognitive functions may be modulated by the level of pain catastrophizing (PC). However, in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), domains of cognitive function that may be affected by the level of PC remain largely unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed to compare cognitive functions between healthy controls and individuals with CLBP with high and low PC.
Methods: This cross-sectional study examined cognitive functions of 42 individuals with CLBP and 21 healthy controls. The PC scale was used to stratify participants with CLBP into high and low PC. Participants performed 5 cognitive tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, namely five-choice reaction time, rapid visual processing, spatial working memory, attention switching task, and stop signal task.
Results: The statistical analyses revealed that compared to individuals with CLBP with low PC and healthy controls, individuals with high PC demonstrated greater values of the between errors (P=0.01), reaction latency (P<0.001), and stop signal reaction time variables (P=0.004, P=0.003, respectively) but lower values of probability of hit (P=0.02, P=0.01, respectively), A' (P=0.01, P<0.001, respectively), and percent correct trials variables (P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively).
Discussion: The results of the current study showed deficits in sustained attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control in individuals with CLBP with high PC. From a clinical perspective, therapeutic interventions targeting PC should be considered to decrease catastrophic thinking about pain in individuals with CLBP. Additional research is warranted to explore cognitive functioning as an outcome of these interventions in individuals with CLBP.
研究目的研究人员认为,慢性疼痛对认知功能的干扰作用可能受疼痛灾难化(PC)水平的调节。然而,对于慢性腰背痛(CLBP)患者来说,认知功能的各个领域可能会受到 PC 水平的影响,这一点在很大程度上仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在比较健康对照组和慢性腰背痛患者的认知功能:这项横断面研究调查了 42 名 CLBP 患者和 21 名健康对照者的认知功能。采用 PC 量表将 CLBP 患者分为高 PC 和低 PC 两类。参与者进行了剑桥神经心理测试自动测试库中的 5 项认知测试,即五选一反应时间、快速视觉处理、空间工作记忆、注意力转换任务和停止信号任务:统计分析显示,与低PC的CLBP患者和健康对照组相比,高PC的患者在错误间距(P=0.01)、反应潜伏期(PDiscussion:本研究结果表明,高 PC 的 CLBP 患者在持续注意力、工作记忆、认知灵活性和抑制控制方面存在缺陷。从临床角度来看,应考虑采取针对 PC 的治疗干预措施,以减少 CLBP 患者对疼痛的灾难性思考。我们有必要开展更多研究,探讨这些干预措施对慢性阻塞性脑脊髓膜炎患者认知功能的影响。
{"title":"Comparison of Cognitive Functions between Healthy Controls and Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain with High and Low Pain Catastrophizing: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Fatemeh Bakhshi Feleh, Razieh Mofateh, Neda Orakifar, Soroush Lohrasbi","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001244","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Researchers suggested that the interruptive effects of chronic pain on cognitive functions may be modulated by the level of pain catastrophizing (PC). However, in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP), domains of cognitive function that may be affected by the level of PC remain largely unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed to compare cognitive functions between healthy controls and individuals with CLBP with high and low PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined cognitive functions of 42 individuals with CLBP and 21 healthy controls. The PC scale was used to stratify participants with CLBP into high and low PC. Participants performed 5 cognitive tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, namely five-choice reaction time, rapid visual processing, spatial working memory, attention switching task, and stop signal task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analyses revealed that compared to individuals with CLBP with low PC and healthy controls, individuals with high PC demonstrated greater values of the between errors (P=0.01), reaction latency (P<0.001), and stop signal reaction time variables (P=0.004, P=0.003, respectively) but lower values of probability of hit (P=0.02, P=0.01, respectively), A' (P=0.01, P<0.001, respectively), and percent correct trials variables (P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of the current study showed deficits in sustained attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control in individuals with CLBP with high PC. From a clinical perspective, therapeutic interventions targeting PC should be considered to decrease catastrophic thinking about pain in individuals with CLBP. Additional research is warranted to explore cognitive functioning as an outcome of these interventions in individuals with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-10DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001242
Sophie M Crouch, John A Baranoff, Samantha Bunzli, Amelia K Mardon, K Jane Chalmers
Objectives: Beliefs and knowledge about pain can influence how an individual approaches pain management. At present, there have been no investigations into the beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain; therefore, pain intervention approaches may not be targeted at current patient understandings. Exploring beliefs and knowledge may help inform and subsequently improve pain intervention outcomes for pelvic pain by allowing more tailored content to be delivered. This study aimed to identify beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews (n=12) were conducted. Based on the Common Sense Model, interview questions investigated participants' beliefs and knowledge related to the identity (diagnostic labels), cause, consequence, control, and timeline of their pelvic pain. Transcribed interviews were analysed using an Interpretive Description Framework.
Results: Participants reported holding biopsychosocial understandings of pain; however, many described their own pain experience in a way that was more aligned with the biomedical model of pain, suggesting incongruence in pain understandings. Participants valued their ability to take charge of their pain management, highlighting bodily autonomy and being proactive in pain management approaches. This approach to management did not provide total control over participants' pelvic pain. Pelvic pain was perceived as disruptive of life, both at present and into the future, with predictability of pain varying over time.
Discussion: This study provides insight into the perspectives of females with pelvic pain. Recommendations for clinicians are provided with a focus on delivering targeted education and equipping patients with helpful representations of their pain.
{"title":"I'm in Charge, But Not Always in Control: A Qualitative Exploration of Female's Beliefs and Knowledge About Their Pelvic Pain.","authors":"Sophie M Crouch, John A Baranoff, Samantha Bunzli, Amelia K Mardon, K Jane Chalmers","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001242","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Beliefs and knowledge about pain can influence how an individual approaches pain management. At present, there have been no investigations into the beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain; therefore, pain intervention approaches may not be targeted at current patient understandings. Exploring beliefs and knowledge may help inform and subsequently improve pain intervention outcomes for pelvic pain by allowing more tailored content to be delivered. This study aimed to identify beliefs and knowledge that females hold about their pelvic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews (n=12) were conducted. Based on the Common Sense Model, interview questions investigated participants' beliefs and knowledge related to the identity (diagnostic labels), cause, consequence, control, and timeline of their pelvic pain. Transcribed interviews were analysed using an Interpretive Description Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported holding biopsychosocial understandings of pain; however, many described their own pain experience in a way that was more aligned with the biomedical model of pain, suggesting incongruence in pain understandings. Participants valued their ability to take charge of their pain management, highlighting bodily autonomy and being proactive in pain management approaches. This approach to management did not provide total control over participants' pelvic pain. Pelvic pain was perceived as disruptive of life, both at present and into the future, with predictability of pain varying over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides insight into the perspectives of females with pelvic pain. Recommendations for clinicians are provided with a focus on delivering targeted education and equipping patients with helpful representations of their pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}