Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001359
Raghuraman M Sethuraman, Sathyasuba Meenakshisundaram
{"title":"Reflections on: \"Efficacy of Perineural Dexamethasone with iPACK and Adductor Canal Block\".","authors":"Raghuraman M Sethuraman, Sathyasuba Meenakshisundaram","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001359","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001364
Chiyoung Lee, Heewon Kim, Seoyoung Kim, Yeri Kim, Xiaoxiao Sun, Chen X Chen, Juyoung Park, Christine Pellegrini, David O Garcia, Nan-Kuei Chen, C Kent Kwoh, Hyochol Ahn
Objectives: We identified key predictors of the heterogeneity of treatment effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial involving 60 participants who underwent 15 daily sessions of 2-mA tDCS over three weeks. We applied group-based trajectory modeling to classify participants into distinct subgroups based on longitudinal KOA pain and symptom patterns from baseline to three months post-intervention to examine differential responses to tDCS. Four learning-based classifiers- Multi-Layer Perceptron, ElasticNet, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees-were then trained to predict the trajectory subgroups using demographic, clinical, and quantitative sensory testing data collected at baseline. Feature selection methods-f-regression, mutual information, and SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-were employed to identify the influential features. Additionally, SHAP was used to analyze the correlation and impact of each feature on classification.
Results: Participants exhibited distinct response patterns to tDCS: high responders (low initial symptoms with significant improvement, n=28) and low responders (high initial symptoms with minimal improvement, n=32). The influential features included pain catastrophizing, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and pressure pain thresholds (PPTh) at the trapezius. SHAP revealed that pain catastrophizing was the most influential feature. Greater pain catastrophizing, lower CPM, and lower PPTh were associated with a higher likelihood of being classified as low responders.
Discussion: Baseline assessments of pain catastrophizing, CPM, and PPTh may be used to stratify participants, optimize treatment allocation, or tailor stimulation parameters for individuals less likely to respond to tDCS protocols.
{"title":"Predicting Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain and Symptoms: A Machine Learning Approach.","authors":"Chiyoung Lee, Heewon Kim, Seoyoung Kim, Yeri Kim, Xiaoxiao Sun, Chen X Chen, Juyoung Park, Christine Pellegrini, David O Garcia, Nan-Kuei Chen, C Kent Kwoh, Hyochol Ahn","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001364","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We identified key predictors of the heterogeneity of treatment effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial involving 60 participants who underwent 15 daily sessions of 2-mA tDCS over three weeks. We applied group-based trajectory modeling to classify participants into distinct subgroups based on longitudinal KOA pain and symptom patterns from baseline to three months post-intervention to examine differential responses to tDCS. Four learning-based classifiers- Multi-Layer Perceptron, ElasticNet, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees-were then trained to predict the trajectory subgroups using demographic, clinical, and quantitative sensory testing data collected at baseline. Feature selection methods-f-regression, mutual information, and SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-were employed to identify the influential features. Additionally, SHAP was used to analyze the correlation and impact of each feature on classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants exhibited distinct response patterns to tDCS: high responders (low initial symptoms with significant improvement, n=28) and low responders (high initial symptoms with minimal improvement, n=32). The influential features included pain catastrophizing, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and pressure pain thresholds (PPTh) at the trapezius. SHAP revealed that pain catastrophizing was the most influential feature. Greater pain catastrophizing, lower CPM, and lower PPTh were associated with a higher likelihood of being classified as low responders.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Baseline assessments of pain catastrophizing, CPM, and PPTh may be used to stratify participants, optimize treatment allocation, or tailor stimulation parameters for individuals less likely to respond to tDCS protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Herpes zoster-related pain has different phases, and the changes in glymphatic function during disease development are unknown. This study investigated stage-dependent changes in glymphatic function and mood scale scores in patients with herpes zoster-related pain, including their interrelationships.
Methods: A total of 43 patients with herpes zoster (HZ), 54 patients with subacute herpetic neuralgia (SHN), 37 patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and 30 healthy controls (HC) were ultimately included as study subjects. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) index was used to evaluate glymphatic function. All patients were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS), the 90-item Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA). ANOVA was used to determine whether there was a difference in the DTI-ALPS index among the 4 groups. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between the DTI-ALPS index and each clinical scale.
Results: DTI-ALPS indices were significantly lower on the left and right sides and mean in the PHN group than in the HC group (left: P=0.025; right: P=0.014; mean: P=0.006). HAMA, HAMD, VAS-SCL-90-R, and HAMD-SCL-90-R scores showed significant positive/negative correlations across all three groups, whereas the HAMA-SCL-90-R correlation was significant in the SHN and PHN groups.
Discussion: Glymphatic dysfunction is observed in cases of zoster pain chronification, and the severity of mood disorders increases across disease stages. These findings provide both a clinical reference for how to qualify patients more comprehensively and a neuroimaging aspect to explore the mechanisms of PHN pathogenesis.
{"title":"From Acute to Chronic: An Analysis of Neuroimaging and the Psychological Evolution of Herpes Zoster-related Pain.","authors":"Jiaxin Xiong, Hongmei Kuang, Yeyuan Chen, Wanqing Zou, Suhong Qin, Xiaofeng Jiang, Lili Gu, Jian Jiang","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Herpes zoster-related pain has different phases, and the changes in glymphatic function during disease development are unknown. This study investigated stage-dependent changes in glymphatic function and mood scale scores in patients with herpes zoster-related pain, including their interrelationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 43 patients with herpes zoster (HZ), 54 patients with subacute herpetic neuralgia (SHN), 37 patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and 30 healthy controls (HC) were ultimately included as study subjects. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) index was used to evaluate glymphatic function. All patients were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS), the 90-item Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA). ANOVA was used to determine whether there was a difference in the DTI-ALPS index among the 4 groups. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between the DTI-ALPS index and each clinical scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DTI-ALPS indices were significantly lower on the left and right sides and mean in the PHN group than in the HC group (left: P=0.025; right: P=0.014; mean: P=0.006). HAMA, HAMD, VAS-SCL-90-R, and HAMD-SCL-90-R scores showed significant positive/negative correlations across all three groups, whereas the HAMA-SCL-90-R correlation was significant in the SHN and PHN groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Glymphatic dysfunction is observed in cases of zoster pain chronification, and the severity of mood disorders increases across disease stages. These findings provide both a clinical reference for how to qualify patients more comprehensively and a neuroimaging aspect to explore the mechanisms of PHN pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001361
Chunmei Fang, Jing Ye, W P Zhang, Lifang Zhu
Objectives: Postoperative pain not only causes physical discomfort for patients but may also adversely affect their rehabilitation. This study aimed to explore the effect of preoperative pain education on postoperative pain and postpartum depression after elective cesarean section.
Methods: A total of 160 women scheduled for elective cesarean section were divided into the control group and observation group (80 cases in each group). The control group received routine preoperative guidance, while the observation group received preoperative pain education on the basis of routine preoperative guidance. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed. Analgesics demand, time to first ambulation and drug-related adverse reactions were recorded in both groups.
Results: The visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the observation group at 24 hours after operation were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the consumption of postoperative analgesic drugs was reduced (57.8±4.5 vs. 60.2±4.7 µg, P=0.001). The time to first ambulation was earlier in the observation group (4.0±0.6 vs. 4.5±0.7 h, P=0.000), and the incidence of postpartum depression was decreased (2 vs. 10, odds ratio=0.179 [95% confidence interval, 0.038-0.847], P=0.016).
Discussion: This study showed that preoperative pain education could not only effectively relieve the pain after cesarean section, reduce the use of analgesic drugs, promote early ambulation, but also reduce the incidence of postpartum depression. (Registration number: ChiCTR2400090909).
{"title":"Effects of Preoperative Pain Education on Postoperative Pain and Postpartum Depression following Elective Cesarean Sections: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Chunmei Fang, Jing Ye, W P Zhang, Lifang Zhu","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative pain not only causes physical discomfort for patients but may also adversely affect their rehabilitation. This study aimed to explore the effect of preoperative pain education on postoperative pain and postpartum depression after elective cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 160 women scheduled for elective cesarean section were divided into the control group and observation group (80 cases in each group). The control group received routine preoperative guidance, while the observation group received preoperative pain education on the basis of routine preoperative guidance. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed. Analgesics demand, time to first ambulation and drug-related adverse reactions were recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the observation group at 24 hours after operation were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Additionally, the consumption of postoperative analgesic drugs was reduced (57.8±4.5 vs. 60.2±4.7 µg, P=0.001). The time to first ambulation was earlier in the observation group (4.0±0.6 vs. 4.5±0.7 h, P=0.000), and the incidence of postpartum depression was decreased (2 vs. 10, odds ratio=0.179 [95% confidence interval, 0.038-0.847], P=0.016).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study showed that preoperative pain education could not only effectively relieve the pain after cesarean section, reduce the use of analgesic drugs, promote early ambulation, but also reduce the incidence of postpartum depression. (Registration number: ChiCTR2400090909).</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001358
Anna Bollinger, Céline K Stäuble, Isabelle O Urdieux, Julia Gianora, Tanja Schüpbach, Isabell Seibert, Florine M Wiss, Chiara Jeiziner, Kurt E Hersberger, Samuel S Allemann, Henriette E Meyer Zu Schwabedissen
Objectives: Interindividual variability in analgesic responsiveness often results in therapy failure (TF) or adverse drug reactions (ADR) and poses a major challenge in chronic pain management, as it is influenced by multiple factors. This exploratory study investigated whether pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing could identify drug-gene-interactions (DGIs) explaining variability in drug response. Additionally, we explored whether genetic predispositions in CYP2D6 and COMT, indicating increased pain sensitivity, are linked to TF.
Methods: We analyzed data from chronic pain patients who underwent pharmacogenotyping due to suspected TF or ADR. PGx panel testing was carried out by a commercial provider. Additional genotyping of COMT rs6269, rs4633, and rs4818 was performed using PCR, RFLP, and Sanger sequencing.
Results: PGx panel testing confirmed at least one relevant genetic variant in 45% of the suspected DGIs. Notably, 41% involved the pharmacogenes CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients carrying the COMT high pain sensitivity (HPS) allele, COMT high pain phenotype, or CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer (IM) phenotype were significantly more likely to experience TF. Logistic regression confirmed both phenotypes as significant predictors of TF.
Discussion: Our findings support the relevance of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 as key pharmacogenes for PGx testing in chronic pain management. The results suggest that a genetic predisposition in CYP2D6 and COMT, associated with increased pain sensitivity, may contribute to insufficient analgesia and subsequent TF. These insights indicate the potential value of incorporating CYP2D6 and COMT as pain-modulating genetic markers into the broader framework of PGx testing.
{"title":"Genetic Determinants of Analgesic Responsiveness: A Focus on CYP2D6 and COMT Polymorphisms in Chronic Pain.","authors":"Anna Bollinger, Céline K Stäuble, Isabelle O Urdieux, Julia Gianora, Tanja Schüpbach, Isabell Seibert, Florine M Wiss, Chiara Jeiziner, Kurt E Hersberger, Samuel S Allemann, Henriette E Meyer Zu Schwabedissen","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001358","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interindividual variability in analgesic responsiveness often results in therapy failure (TF) or adverse drug reactions (ADR) and poses a major challenge in chronic pain management, as it is influenced by multiple factors. This exploratory study investigated whether pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing could identify drug-gene-interactions (DGIs) explaining variability in drug response. Additionally, we explored whether genetic predispositions in CYP2D6 and COMT, indicating increased pain sensitivity, are linked to TF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from chronic pain patients who underwent pharmacogenotyping due to suspected TF or ADR. PGx panel testing was carried out by a commercial provider. Additional genotyping of COMT rs6269, rs4633, and rs4818 was performed using PCR, RFLP, and Sanger sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PGx panel testing confirmed at least one relevant genetic variant in 45% of the suspected DGIs. Notably, 41% involved the pharmacogenes CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients carrying the COMT high pain sensitivity (HPS) allele, COMT high pain phenotype, or CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer (IM) phenotype were significantly more likely to experience TF. Logistic regression confirmed both phenotypes as significant predictors of TF.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings support the relevance of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 as key pharmacogenes for PGx testing in chronic pain management. The results suggest that a genetic predisposition in CYP2D6 and COMT, associated with increased pain sensitivity, may contribute to insufficient analgesia and subsequent TF. These insights indicate the potential value of incorporating CYP2D6 and COMT as pain-modulating genetic markers into the broader framework of PGx testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001357
Rachel V Aaron, Fenan S Rassu, Kristin R Archer, Amanda L Stone, Amanda Priest, Kavya Bhattiprolu, Stephen Bruehl, Greg Osgood, Renan C Castillo, Stephen T Wegener, Claudia M Campbell
Objectives: Orthopedic trauma is a major cause of disability worldwide; around half of people who sustain orthopedic trauma develop chronic pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method of assessing pain sensitivity, which may be useful in characterizing pain after injury and predicting chronic pain. This primary aim of this project was to test the feasibility of a portable QST battery, administered to adults 6-weeks post major orthopedic trauma and surgery.
Methods: 29 participants (62% male; 52% black) who sustained major orthopedic trauma and surgery completed QST testing (including static measures, conditioned pain modulation, mechanical temporal summation) at their 6-week post-operative visit and were invited to complete a 6-month follow-up survey. We examined feasibility and acceptability indices and explored associations between QST and clinical pain ratings.
Results: Of all eligible patients, 77% were recruited. QST procedures were feasible and tolerable. No participant declined participation, withdrew for reasons related to study procedures, or discontinued QST due to discomfort. No patient experienced increased clinical pain after QST. Exploratory analyses identified a positive association between static QST and pain interference at T1. Feasibility challenges included poor 6-month retention (57%), and difficulty administering QST to patients with upper extremity injuries. High rates of analgesic use prior to testing (38%) poses an additional barrier for future QST studies in this population.
Discussion: QST was acceptable and partially feasible; challenges included poor retention, high rates of analgesic use, and logistical barriers to accessing injury sites for testing. We pose several potential solutions for future research.
{"title":"Quantitative Sensory Testing Following Orthopedic Trauma: A Longitudinal Multi-Site Feasibility Study.","authors":"Rachel V Aaron, Fenan S Rassu, Kristin R Archer, Amanda L Stone, Amanda Priest, Kavya Bhattiprolu, Stephen Bruehl, Greg Osgood, Renan C Castillo, Stephen T Wegener, Claudia M Campbell","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001357","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Orthopedic trauma is a major cause of disability worldwide; around half of people who sustain orthopedic trauma develop chronic pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a standardized method of assessing pain sensitivity, which may be useful in characterizing pain after injury and predicting chronic pain. This primary aim of this project was to test the feasibility of a portable QST battery, administered to adults 6-weeks post major orthopedic trauma and surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>29 participants (62% male; 52% black) who sustained major orthopedic trauma and surgery completed QST testing (including static measures, conditioned pain modulation, mechanical temporal summation) at their 6-week post-operative visit and were invited to complete a 6-month follow-up survey. We examined feasibility and acceptability indices and explored associations between QST and clinical pain ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all eligible patients, 77% were recruited. QST procedures were feasible and tolerable. No participant declined participation, withdrew for reasons related to study procedures, or discontinued QST due to discomfort. No patient experienced increased clinical pain after QST. Exploratory analyses identified a positive association between static QST and pain interference at T1. Feasibility challenges included poor 6-month retention (57%), and difficulty administering QST to patients with upper extremity injuries. High rates of analgesic use prior to testing (38%) poses an additional barrier for future QST studies in this population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>QST was acceptable and partially feasible; challenges included poor retention, high rates of analgesic use, and logistical barriers to accessing injury sites for testing. We pose several potential solutions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12846631/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001356
Line Marie Saugmann Razniak, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Andrea Aagaard, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Monika Irene Hasenbring, Maria Lund Rasmussen, Sophie Lykkegaard Ravn
Objectives: This study examined how patients with high-impact chronic pain interpreted and responded to the Danish version of the Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AE-FS) to identify potential problematic items that did not correspond with item intention and causes for this.
Methods: Participants were recruited from patients referred to treatment in an interdisciplinary pain center to partake in cognitive interviews following the Three-Step Test-Interview protocol. Interview transcripts were analyzed in two steps. First, a coding analysis was used to code responses in relation to item intention using four predefined codes (congruent, incongruent, ambiguous, or confused) to identify potential problematic items (≤50% congruent responses). Second, a reflexive thematic analysis was used to uncover causes of incongruency in the problematic items as well as elements of confusion across all items.
Results: Thirty-four participants were included. Three items (1, 4, and 6) were identified as being problematic with items 1 and 4 having many incongruent responses. The most common causes of incongruency were related to formulations of items, and seven elements of confusion were uncovered across all items.
Discussion: The current study identified potential issues with participants' interpretation of three items. However, as interviews may be prone to the influence of social desirability bias, the interpretation of the results for item 4, where the most frequent non-congruent interpretation of making a fuss was equal to lack of pain validation, is done with caution. Therefore, a revision is suggested with reformulation of item 6 and removal of item 1, which, however, will require validation in future research.
{"title":"Interpretation of the Avoidance-endurance Fast-screen Questionnaire: A Qualitative Study Using Cognitive Interviews in Patients with High-impact Chronic Pain.","authors":"Line Marie Saugmann Razniak, Henrik Bjarke Vægter, Andrea Aagaard, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Monika Irene Hasenbring, Maria Lund Rasmussen, Sophie Lykkegaard Ravn","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001356","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined how patients with high-impact chronic pain interpreted and responded to the Danish version of the Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AE-FS) to identify potential problematic items that did not correspond with item intention and causes for this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from patients referred to treatment in an interdisciplinary pain center to partake in cognitive interviews following the Three-Step Test-Interview protocol. Interview transcripts were analyzed in two steps. First, a coding analysis was used to code responses in relation to item intention using four predefined codes (congruent, incongruent, ambiguous, or confused) to identify potential problematic items (≤50% congruent responses). Second, a reflexive thematic analysis was used to uncover causes of incongruency in the problematic items as well as elements of confusion across all items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four participants were included. Three items (1, 4, and 6) were identified as being problematic with items 1 and 4 having many incongruent responses. The most common causes of incongruency were related to formulations of items, and seven elements of confusion were uncovered across all items.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The current study identified potential issues with participants' interpretation of three items. However, as interviews may be prone to the influence of social desirability bias, the interpretation of the results for item 4, where the most frequent non-congruent interpretation of making a fuss was equal to lack of pain validation, is done with caution. Therefore, a revision is suggested with reformulation of item 6 and removal of item 1, which, however, will require validation in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145919120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001326
Floris V Raasveld, Maxime R A Tiems, Benjamin R Johnston, Omar Moussa, Ian L Valerio, David Hao, J Henk Coert, Kyle R Eberlin
Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) resulting from trauma or surgery can lead to neuropathic pain and, in some cases progress to centralized pain. This condition significantly affects patients' quality of life and functional abilities. However, diagnostic criteria for centralized pain after PNI remain poorly defined, complicating patient identification and treatment. This systematic review aimede to assess current diagnostic approaches and propose evidence-based criteria for clinical diagnosis.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was conducted for studies assessing diagnostic approaches for centralized pain after PNI. Included studies addressed clinical characteristics, diagnostic tests, or signs of centralized pain after PNI. Exclusion criteria included acute pain studies (<3 mo), pediatric patients, and non-English articles.
Results: From 950 citations screened, 28 studies (6189 patients) were included. On the basis of the synthesized evidence, we propose the following diagnostic criteria for centralized pain after PNI: (1) documented peripheral nervous system injury or compression; (2) neuropathic pain persisting for 3 months; (3) hyperalgesia, allodynia, or other forms of hypersensitivity extending beyond the primary zone of injury; (4) associated mood/cognitive disturbances; and (5) limited response to peripheral nerve blocks, defined as <50% pain reduction, if performed.
Conclusions: This study proposes a comprehensive, evidence-based diagnostic framework for centralized pain after PNI. The algorithm combines clinical criteria with optional diagnostic testing, providing a practical approach for diagnosis that accounts for variability in access to advanced diagnostic tools. By standardizing the diagnostic process, the framework aims to enhance patient identification and support appropriate treatment selection in clinical practice.
Level of evidence: Level III-systematic reviews.
由创伤或手术引起的周围神经损伤(PNIs)可导致神经性疼痛,在某些情况下进展为集中疼痛。这种情况显著影响患者的生活质量和功能能力。然而,PNI后集中疼痛的诊断标准仍然不明确,使患者识别和治疗复杂化。本系统综述旨在评估当前的诊断方法,并提出临床诊断的循证标准。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和CENTRAL,以评估PNI后集中疼痛诊断方法的研究。纳入的研究涉及PNI后的临床特征、诊断测试或集中疼痛的体征。排除标准包括急性疼痛研究(结果:从950篇文献中筛选,包括28项研究(6189例患者)。基于综合证据,我们提出以下诊断PNI后集中疼痛的标准:(1)周围神经系统损伤或压迫,(2)神经性疼痛持续三个月,(3)痛觉过敏、异常性疼痛或其他形式的超敏反应延伸到主要损伤区之外,(4)相关的情绪/认知障碍,(5)周围神经阻滞反应有限,定义为小于本研究提出了一个全面的、基于证据的PNI后集中疼痛诊断框架。该算法将临床标准与可选的诊断测试相结合,提供了一种实用的诊断方法,说明了获得先进诊断工具的可变性。通过标准化诊断过程,该框架旨在加强患者识别和支持临床实践中适当的治疗选择。
{"title":"Diagnostic Criteria for Centralized Pain Following Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Floris V Raasveld, Maxime R A Tiems, Benjamin R Johnston, Omar Moussa, Ian L Valerio, David Hao, J Henk Coert, Kyle R Eberlin","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001326","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) resulting from trauma or surgery can lead to neuropathic pain and, in some cases progress to centralized pain. This condition significantly affects patients' quality of life and functional abilities. However, diagnostic criteria for centralized pain after PNI remain poorly defined, complicating patient identification and treatment. This systematic review aimede to assess current diagnostic approaches and propose evidence-based criteria for clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was conducted for studies assessing diagnostic approaches for centralized pain after PNI. Included studies addressed clinical characteristics, diagnostic tests, or signs of centralized pain after PNI. Exclusion criteria included acute pain studies (<3 mo), pediatric patients, and non-English articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 950 citations screened, 28 studies (6189 patients) were included. On the basis of the synthesized evidence, we propose the following diagnostic criteria for centralized pain after PNI: (1) documented peripheral nervous system injury or compression; (2) neuropathic pain persisting for 3 months; (3) hyperalgesia, allodynia, or other forms of hypersensitivity extending beyond the primary zone of injury; (4) associated mood/cognitive disturbances; and (5) limited response to peripheral nerve blocks, defined as <50% pain reduction, if performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposes a comprehensive, evidence-based diagnostic framework for centralized pain after PNI. The algorithm combines clinical criteria with optional diagnostic testing, providing a practical approach for diagnosis that accounts for variability in access to advanced diagnostic tools. By standardizing the diagnostic process, the framework aims to enhance patient identification and support appropriate treatment selection in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-systematic reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145114926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001355
Phillip Kaasgaard Sperling, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Allan Vestergaard Danielsen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Jannie Bisgaard, Rocco Giordano
Objectives: Postoperative pain is common after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS). Recent evidence suggest that preoperative inflammatory biomarkers might be associated to chronic postoperative pain following major surgery, but the association between preoperative inflammation and acute pain after VATS have not been examined. This observational cohort study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers and acute postoperative pain in lung cancer patients undergoing VATS.
Methods: Preoperative plasma samples from cancer patients scheduled for VATS were analyzed for 92 inflammatory markers using the Olink Bioscience inflammation panel. Postoperative pain was measured during the first 48 hours using a numerical rating scale (0-10 point scale). Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to identify important inflammatory markers and combined with preoperative pain and postoperative opioid usage to predict postoperative pain using a multiple linear regression model.
Results: The current study included 92 patients and 41 inflammatory biomarkers passing quality control. OPLS-DA identified 16 important markers. An initial prediction model explained 27.2% of postoperative pain variability, while a condensed model using backwards elimination, explained 34.3% of postoperative pain variability. The condensed model included the inflammatory biomarkers 4E-BP1, STAMBP, MCP-2, VEGFA, and adjusted for postoperative opioid consumption.
Discussion: The current study is the first to demonstrate an association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers, opioid consumption, and acute postoperative pain after VATS in patients with lung cancer. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
{"title":"A Potential Link Between Preoperative Inflammation Biomarkers and Acute Postoperative Pain Following VATS.","authors":"Phillip Kaasgaard Sperling, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Allan Vestergaard Danielsen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Jannie Bisgaard, Rocco Giordano","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative pain is common after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS). Recent evidence suggest that preoperative inflammatory biomarkers might be associated to chronic postoperative pain following major surgery, but the association between preoperative inflammation and acute pain after VATS have not been examined. This observational cohort study aimed to investigate the association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers and acute postoperative pain in lung cancer patients undergoing VATS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative plasma samples from cancer patients scheduled for VATS were analyzed for 92 inflammatory markers using the Olink Bioscience inflammation panel. Postoperative pain was measured during the first 48 hours using a numerical rating scale (0-10 point scale). Principal component analysis and Orthogonal Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to identify important inflammatory markers and combined with preoperative pain and postoperative opioid usage to predict postoperative pain using a multiple linear regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current study included 92 patients and 41 inflammatory biomarkers passing quality control. OPLS-DA identified 16 important markers. An initial prediction model explained 27.2% of postoperative pain variability, while a condensed model using backwards elimination, explained 34.3% of postoperative pain variability. The condensed model included the inflammatory biomarkers 4E-BP1, STAMBP, MCP-2, VEGFA, and adjusted for postoperative opioid consumption.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The current study is the first to demonstrate an association between preoperative inflammatory biomarkers, opioid consumption, and acute postoperative pain after VATS in patients with lung cancer. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}