Trends in female applicants to Canadian ophthalmology residency programs from 1998-2020.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.77587
Heather M McDonald, Stephanie L Cote, Austin McMillan, Sapna Sharan
{"title":"Trends in female applicants to Canadian ophthalmology residency programs from 1998-2020.","authors":"Heather M McDonald, Stephanie L Cote, Austin McMillan, Sapna Sharan","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ophthalmology has historically been a male-dominated specialty. Despite there being a higher proportion of females in Canadian medical schools since the early 2000s, it is unknown if trends in female applicants and those accepted to ophthalmology have followed suit. This study aims to evaluate trends in gender representation of ophthalmology applicants to Canadian residency programs from 1998 to 2020 and to compare those trends to other surgical specialties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained aggregate data of the annual number of male and female applicants ranking and successfully matching to ophthalmology as their first-choice specialty from the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) database. We then carried out a retrospective cross-sectional analysis on the publicly available data. Subsequently, we compared trends in female applicants to ophthalmology, as well as female practicing ophthalmologists, to other surgical disciplines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of female applicants increased from 24.3% in 1998 to 33.3% in 2020 (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and matched female applicants increased from 28.6% in 1998 to 40.5% in 2020 (<i>p</i> = 0.023). However, the incremental change in proportion did not statistically significantly increase in 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020. Comparison of male and female matching success rates did not reveal a significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.45). Trends in female applicants to ophthalmology and female practicing ophthalmologists were similar to other surgical specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the proportion of female applicants is increasing, there is a recent plateau and an inability to equalize the female-to-male ratio in ophthalmology. Further studies are needed to identify potential barriers and mitigate possible residual gender biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"15 6","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ophthalmology has historically been a male-dominated specialty. Despite there being a higher proportion of females in Canadian medical schools since the early 2000s, it is unknown if trends in female applicants and those accepted to ophthalmology have followed suit. This study aims to evaluate trends in gender representation of ophthalmology applicants to Canadian residency programs from 1998 to 2020 and to compare those trends to other surgical specialties.

Methods: We obtained aggregate data of the annual number of male and female applicants ranking and successfully matching to ophthalmology as their first-choice specialty from the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) database. We then carried out a retrospective cross-sectional analysis on the publicly available data. Subsequently, we compared trends in female applicants to ophthalmology, as well as female practicing ophthalmologists, to other surgical disciplines.

Results: The proportion of female applicants increased from 24.3% in 1998 to 33.3% in 2020 (p = 0.001), and matched female applicants increased from 28.6% in 1998 to 40.5% in 2020 (p = 0.023). However, the incremental change in proportion did not statistically significantly increase in 2008-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020. Comparison of male and female matching success rates did not reveal a significant difference (p = 0.45). Trends in female applicants to ophthalmology and female practicing ophthalmologists were similar to other surgical specialties.

Conclusions: Although the proportion of female applicants is increasing, there is a recent plateau and an inability to equalize the female-to-male ratio in ophthalmology. Further studies are needed to identify potential barriers and mitigate possible residual gender biases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1998-2020年加拿大眼科住院医师项目女性申请者趋势
背景:眼科学历来是男性主导的专业。尽管自21世纪初以来,加拿大医学院的女性比例有所上升,但尚不清楚女性申请者和被眼科录取的女性是否也有同样的趋势。本研究旨在评估1998年至2020年加拿大住院医师项目眼科申请者的性别代表趋势,并将这些趋势与其他外科专业进行比较。方法:我们从加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS)数据库中获得年度男性和女性申请人排名并成功匹配眼科作为首选专业的汇总数据。然后,我们对公开可用的数据进行了回顾性横断面分析。随后,我们比较了女性申请眼科的趋势,以及女性执业眼科医生与其他外科学科的趋势。结果:女性申请者比例从1998年的24.3%上升到2020年的33.3% (p = 0.001),匹配的女性申请者比例从1998年的28.6%上升到2020年的40.5% (p = 0.023)。但在2008-2012年、2013-2016年和2017-2020年,比例增量变化没有统计学意义上的显著增加。男女配对成功率比较无显著差异(p = 0.45)。女性申请眼科和女性执业眼科医生的趋势与其他外科专业相似。结论:虽然女性申请者的比例正在增加,但最近出现了一个平台期,无法使眼科的男女比例平衡。需要进一步的研究来确定潜在的障碍并减轻可能残留的性别偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Dear MD to Be Podcast as an Equity, Diversity and Inclusion resource: a cross-sectional survey analysis. Fairness in health professions selection: learning from organizational justice theory and a pandemic. Overcoming adversity: the resilience of first-generation medical school applicants. Suicide prevention skills training in pre-clerkship medical students: a pilot study. The CMEJ in phases: closing out 2024, closing in on 2030.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1