Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer
{"title":"One-Year Outcomes in Subjects Developing Macular Neovascularization While Undergoing Avacincaptad Pegol Therapy for Geographic Atrophy.","authors":"Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S498985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm<sup>2</sup>and ≤ 17.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S498985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Methods: This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm2and ≤ 17.5 mm2, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.
Results: There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm2 (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm2 (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.
Conclusion: Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.