One-Year Outcomes in Subjects Developing Macular Neovascularization While Undergoing Avacincaptad Pegol Therapy for Geographic Atrophy.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S498985
Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer
{"title":"One-Year Outcomes in Subjects Developing Macular Neovascularization While Undergoing Avacincaptad Pegol Therapy for Geographic Atrophy.","authors":"Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert Reinauer","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S498985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm<sup>2</sup>and ≤ 17.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm<sup>2</sup> (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11727320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S498985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the 12-month outcomes in subjects developing macular neovascularization (MNV) during intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: This research was conducted as a case-controlled, retrospective study of AMD subjects undergoing IVA treatment for GA from two private practice institutions. Subjects were divided into 1) a Study Group of patients who developed MNV and then underwent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy during the study period, and 2) a Control Group of patients who were complication-free during the study period. Both cohorts had a baseline Snellen visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a baseline GA total area of ≥ 1 mm2and ≤ 17.5 mm2, and 12 months of follow-up after initiation of IVA for GA.

Results: There were 56 patients analyzed. There were no significant differences in baseline features between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.22 logMAR (-0.27 to -0.17) versus -0.06 logMAR (-0.12 to 0.00); p=<0.0001], and greater GA total lesion growth [1.78 mm2 (1.53-2.03) versus 0.78 mm2 (0.54-1.02); p=<0.0001] during the 12-month study period compared to the Control Group.

Conclusion: Patients developing MNV while undergoing IVA treatment for GA secondary to AMD have worse clinical outcomes despite undergoing anti-VEGF therapy compared to patients who were complication-free at 12-months. This highlights the seriousness of MNV in this patient population and may help specialists counsel patients when considering treatment for GA secondary to AMD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受阿伐伐他汀Pegol疗法治疗地理萎缩时出现黄斑新生血管的受试者的一年疗效。
目的:评估年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)继发地理性萎缩(GA)患者在玻璃体静脉注射avacincaptad pegol (IVA)治疗期间发生黄斑新生血管(MNV)的12个月结果。方法:本研究是一项病例对照的回顾性研究,来自两家私人执业机构的AMD患者因GA接受IVA治疗。研究对象分为两组:1)研究组为研究期间发生MNV并接受抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗的患者;2)对照组为研究期间无并发症的患者。两个队列的基线Snellen视力≥20/200,基线GA总面积≥1 mm2和≤17.5 mm2, GA IVA开始后随访12个月。结果:共分析56例患者。各组间基线特征无显著差异。研究组的视力下降幅度更大[-0.22 logMAR(-0.27至-0.17)相比-0.06 logMAR(-0.12至0.00);P =2 (1.53-2.03) vs 0.78 mm2 (0.54-1.02);p=结论:与12个月无并发症的患者相比,尽管接受了抗vegf治疗,但在接受IVA治疗时发生MNV的患者的临床结果更差。这突出了MNV在这一患者群体中的严重性,可能有助于专家在考虑治疗继发于AMD的GA时为患者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping in Healthy Population Corneas Using MS-39 Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. Diagnostic Capability of Pattern Electroretinogram and Three Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Circle Diameter Scans in Glaucoma Suspects. The "Triangle" Sign: A Novel Ultrasound Marker for Diagnosing Total Choroidal Detachment and Total Suprachoroidal Hemorrhage. Correlating the Optical Coherence Tomography Patterns and Biomarkers of Diabetic Macular Edema with Hemoglobin Level in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Effects of Switching to Netarsudil/Latanoprost Fixed Dose Combination from Various Latanoprost Regimens: The Phase 4 MORE Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1