Rainfall intensities determine accuracy of canopy interception simulation using the Revised Gash model

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110389
Mengliang Ma , Qiang Li , Yaping Wang , Jin Liang , Jiangyao Wang , Jinliang Liu , Mingfang Zhang
{"title":"Rainfall intensities determine accuracy of canopy interception simulation using the Revised Gash model","authors":"Mengliang Ma ,&nbsp;Qiang Li ,&nbsp;Yaping Wang ,&nbsp;Jin Liang ,&nbsp;Jiangyao Wang ,&nbsp;Jinliang Liu ,&nbsp;Mingfang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rainfall canopy interception plays a crucial role in rainfall redistribution and hydrological processes in forests. While previous studies have often focused on monthly or yearly time scales, the responses of forest canopy interception to different rainfall magnitudes, frequencies and intensities, particularly under changing climate conditions have been less explored. In addition, the performance of canopy interception models that capture the dynamics of rainfall interception under changing climate remains largely unknown. In this study, we conducted field observations across various tree species and used the Revised Gash model to evaluate the canopy interception under different rainfall intensities. Our findings revealed that the observed interception loss of gross precipitation were 26.1 %, 42.1 %, and 41.6 % for <em>Pinus tabuliformis</em> (<em>PT</em>), <em>Quercus wutaishanica</em> (<em>QW</em>), and <em>Betula platyphylla</em> (<em>BP</em>), respectively. The Revised Gash model accurately estimated canopy interception, with percentage errors of 0.4 %, 5.6 %, and 22.3 % for <em>PT, QW</em>, and <em>BP</em>, respectively. Interestingly, the model performed better for <em>PT</em>, especially under light to moderate rain, while its applicability for <em>QW</em> and <em>BP</em> were diminished under moderate to heavy rain. Overall, the Revised Gash model underestimated interception loss across different rainfall intensities, with more pronounced underestimations observed at higher rainfall intensities. Evaporation during and after rainfall contributed significantly to over 85.3 % of interception loss across three tree species. Sensitivity analysis highlighted that parameters including mean rainfall intensity, mean wet canopy evaporation rate, and canopy storage capacity were critical in influencing canopy interception simulation. These findings highlight the influence of rainfall intensity on the model's reliability in simulating interception loss and provide insights for forest hydrology research in semi-arid regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 110389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rainfall canopy interception plays a crucial role in rainfall redistribution and hydrological processes in forests. While previous studies have often focused on monthly or yearly time scales, the responses of forest canopy interception to different rainfall magnitudes, frequencies and intensities, particularly under changing climate conditions have been less explored. In addition, the performance of canopy interception models that capture the dynamics of rainfall interception under changing climate remains largely unknown. In this study, we conducted field observations across various tree species and used the Revised Gash model to evaluate the canopy interception under different rainfall intensities. Our findings revealed that the observed interception loss of gross precipitation were 26.1 %, 42.1 %, and 41.6 % for Pinus tabuliformis (PT), Quercus wutaishanica (QW), and Betula platyphylla (BP), respectively. The Revised Gash model accurately estimated canopy interception, with percentage errors of 0.4 %, 5.6 %, and 22.3 % for PT, QW, and BP, respectively. Interestingly, the model performed better for PT, especially under light to moderate rain, while its applicability for QW and BP were diminished under moderate to heavy rain. Overall, the Revised Gash model underestimated interception loss across different rainfall intensities, with more pronounced underestimations observed at higher rainfall intensities. Evaporation during and after rainfall contributed significantly to over 85.3 % of interception loss across three tree species. Sensitivity analysis highlighted that parameters including mean rainfall intensity, mean wet canopy evaporation rate, and canopy storage capacity were critical in influencing canopy interception simulation. These findings highlight the influence of rainfall intensity on the model's reliability in simulating interception loss and provide insights for forest hydrology research in semi-arid regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降雨强度决定了修正Gash模型的冠层拦截模拟精度
雨冠截留在森林降雨再分配和水文过程中起着至关重要的作用。虽然以前的研究往往集中在每月或每年的时间尺度上,但对森林冠层拦截对不同降雨幅度、频率和强度的响应,特别是在不断变化的气候条件下的响应探索较少。此外,在气候变化条件下,冠层截流模型的性能在很大程度上仍是未知的。本研究通过对不同树种的野外观测,利用修正Gash模型对不同降雨强度下的林冠截留量进行了评估。结果表明,油松(PT)、五台山栎(QW)和白桦(BP)对总降水的截留损失分别为26.1%、42.1%和41.6%。修正后的Gash模型准确地估计了林冠截留,PT、QW和BP的百分比误差分别为0.4%、5.6%和22.3%。有趣的是,该模型对PT的适用性较好,特别是在小雨到中雨条件下,而对QW和BP的适用性在中雨到大雨条件下减弱。总体而言,修订后的Gash模型低估了不同降雨强度下的拦截损失,在较高降雨强度下的低估更为明显。降雨期间和降雨后的蒸发对3种树种截留损失的贡献超过85.3%。敏感性分析表明,平均降雨强度、平均湿冠层蒸发速率和冠层存储量是影响冠层拦截模拟的关键参数。这些发现突出了降雨强度对模型模拟截留损失可靠性的影响,为半干旱区森林水文研究提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Multifactorial interactions contribute to contrasting wildfire trends at mid–high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere Two improved shuttleworth-wallace models for estimating consecutive daily evapotranspiration Shifts in soil freeze-thaw cycle and their climate impacts along the alpine wetland-grassland continuum Modeling carbon and water fluxes in agro-pastoral systems under contrasting climates and different management practices Contributions of diffusion and ebullition processes to total methane fluxes from a subtropical rice paddy field in southeastern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1