Design thinking in action: a quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects

IF 6.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0424
Claudio Dell’Era, Stefano Magistretti, Marina Candi, Mattia Bianchi, Giulia Calabretta, Ileana Stigliani, Roberto Verganti
{"title":"Design thinking in action: a quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects","authors":"Claudio Dell’Era, Stefano Magistretti, Marina Candi, Mattia Bianchi, Giulia Calabretta, Ileana Stigliani, Roberto Verganti","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Design thinking is widely recognized as an effective problem-solving approach in the professional and academic world, albeit with varying interpretations. It has been studied in multiple forms – as a tool, a practice, a skill and a mindset – leading to ongoing debates about its fundamental nature. This study aims to explore the use of design thinking in practice and determine how its application varies depending on the characteristics of the innovation projects, namely, the types of goals pursued and the level of uncertainty involved.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a survey methodology and a knowledge-intensive empirical setting, this study analyzes a data set of 221 innovation consulting projects based on design thinking conducted by European consulting firms and design agencies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>By analyzing the survey data, the authors identify six distinct sets of design thinking practices: discovering user needs, understanding the problem addressed, challenging existing assumptions, navigating the problem-solution pair, ideating through visualizations and learning through prototypes. The authors also identify configurations of these design thinking practices that are used to address different innovation project goals and levels of uncertainty.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The study draws attention to the need for design thinking practitioners to be aware of how different innovation project goals and levels of uncertainty can be pursued/addressed through the use of alternative configurations of design thinking practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors knowledge, this study is one of the first large-scale quantitative analyses of the nature of design thinking in action, providing a solid foundation for future research on design thinking.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Design thinking is widely recognized as an effective problem-solving approach in the professional and academic world, albeit with varying interpretations. It has been studied in multiple forms – as a tool, a practice, a skill and a mindset – leading to ongoing debates about its fundamental nature. This study aims to explore the use of design thinking in practice and determine how its application varies depending on the characteristics of the innovation projects, namely, the types of goals pursued and the level of uncertainty involved.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a survey methodology and a knowledge-intensive empirical setting, this study analyzes a data set of 221 innovation consulting projects based on design thinking conducted by European consulting firms and design agencies.

Findings

By analyzing the survey data, the authors identify six distinct sets of design thinking practices: discovering user needs, understanding the problem addressed, challenging existing assumptions, navigating the problem-solution pair, ideating through visualizations and learning through prototypes. The authors also identify configurations of these design thinking practices that are used to address different innovation project goals and levels of uncertainty.

Practical implications

The study draws attention to the need for design thinking practitioners to be aware of how different innovation project goals and levels of uncertainty can be pursued/addressed through the use of alternative configurations of design thinking practices.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors knowledge, this study is one of the first large-scale quantitative analyses of the nature of design thinking in action, providing a solid foundation for future research on design thinking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动中的设计思维:创新项目中设计思维实践的定量研究
在专业和学术界,设计思维被广泛认为是一种有效的解决问题的方法,尽管有不同的解释。人们以多种形式对它进行了研究——作为一种工具、一种实践、一种技能和一种心态——导致了关于它的基本性质的持续争论。本研究旨在探讨设计思维在实践中的应用,并确定其应用如何随创新项目的特征而变化,即所追求的目标类型和所涉及的不确定性水平。本研究采用调查方法和知识密集型实证设置,分析了欧洲咨询公司和设计机构基于设计思维的221个创新咨询项目的数据集。通过分析调查数据,作者确定了六组不同的设计思维实践:发现用户需求,理解所要解决的问题,挑战现有的假设,导航问题-解决方案对,通过可视化进行构思,通过原型进行学习。作者还确定了这些设计思维实践的配置,这些设计思维实践用于处理不同的创新项目目标和不确定性水平。实践意义本研究提请注意,设计思维实践者需要意识到如何通过使用设计思维实践的替代配置来追求/解决不同的创新项目目标和不确定性水平。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是第一次大规模定量分析设计思维的本质,为未来的设计思维研究提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Knowledge Management covers all the key issues in its field including: ■Developing an appropriate culture and communication strategy ■Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure ■Knowledge management and the learning organization ■Information organization and retrieval technologies for improving the quality of knowledge ■Linking knowledge management to performance initiatives ■Retaining knowledge - human and intellectual capital ■Using information technology to develop knowledge management ■Knowledge management and innovation ■Measuring the value of knowledge already within an organization ■What lies beyond knowledge management?
期刊最新文献
Cross-border interpersonal knowledge sharing within the MNE: does intra-MNE competition hinder or facilitate it? Bridging role conflict and active lurking: the role of transformational leadership in B2B online communities Emotional resources and knowledge management: a gender perspective on human-centric innovation amidst crises Boosting crowdfunding via knowledge ecosystems: an exploratory analysis through a bibliometric literature review Performance motivation and knowledge hiding: exploring the role of moral disengagement in education sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1