{"title":"Firm ownerships matter in measuring carbon footprints and its driving forces in China's domestic value chains.","authors":"Anjing Wang, Yu Liu, Bo Meng, Hao Lv, Hua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some research has studied the carbon footprints of the multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the global value chains (GVCs). However, currently there are few studies have studied the carbon footprints of the foreign invested firms (FIFs) distributed in different provinces in China's domestic value chains (DVCs). This paper has used China's inter-provincial input-output table distinguishing domestically owned enterprises (DEs), Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan (HMTs) invested enterprises and other foreign invested enterprises (FIEs) to study the carbon footprints of the FIFs in China's DVCs and further analyzed the driving factors of the carbon footprints change. The results show that: (1) In 2017, more than two-thirds of the carbon footprints came from FIEs and this proportion had decreased 5.6% compared with 2012. The FIFs located in coastal provinces or economically developed areas basically have the largest carbon footprints. (2) The production activity of the FIFs located in some developed provinces has mostly driven the carbon emissions of other provinces that have direct or indirect trade with them. While in some less affluent energy provinces, it has mainly driven the carbon emissions of the local DEs. (3) The biggest driving factor for reducing the carbon footprints of the FIFs is the carbon emissions intensity of the DEs, followed by the input-output relationship between DEs and FIFs. The final product production of the HMTs is the largest driving factor that promoting the increase of the FIFs' carbon footprints, followed by the final product production of the FIEs. However, different driving factors have different contributions in different provinces. The research results of this article have important research significance for reasonably introducing foreign investment and promoting the reduction of the FIFs' carbon footprints in various provinces in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"374 ","pages":"124049"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Some research has studied the carbon footprints of the multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the global value chains (GVCs). However, currently there are few studies have studied the carbon footprints of the foreign invested firms (FIFs) distributed in different provinces in China's domestic value chains (DVCs). This paper has used China's inter-provincial input-output table distinguishing domestically owned enterprises (DEs), Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan (HMTs) invested enterprises and other foreign invested enterprises (FIEs) to study the carbon footprints of the FIFs in China's DVCs and further analyzed the driving factors of the carbon footprints change. The results show that: (1) In 2017, more than two-thirds of the carbon footprints came from FIEs and this proportion had decreased 5.6% compared with 2012. The FIFs located in coastal provinces or economically developed areas basically have the largest carbon footprints. (2) The production activity of the FIFs located in some developed provinces has mostly driven the carbon emissions of other provinces that have direct or indirect trade with them. While in some less affluent energy provinces, it has mainly driven the carbon emissions of the local DEs. (3) The biggest driving factor for reducing the carbon footprints of the FIFs is the carbon emissions intensity of the DEs, followed by the input-output relationship between DEs and FIFs. The final product production of the HMTs is the largest driving factor that promoting the increase of the FIFs' carbon footprints, followed by the final product production of the FIEs. However, different driving factors have different contributions in different provinces. The research results of this article have important research significance for reasonably introducing foreign investment and promoting the reduction of the FIFs' carbon footprints in various provinces in China.
一些研究对跨国企业在全球价值链(GVC)中的碳足迹进行了研究。然而,目前很少有研究对中国国内价值链(DVCs)中分布在不同省份的外商投资企业(FIFs)的碳足迹进行研究。本文利用中国省际投入产出表,区分内资企业、港澳台投资企业和其他外商投资企业,研究了中国国内价值链中外商投资企业的碳足迹,并进一步分析了碳足迹变化的驱动因素。结果显示(1)2017年,超过三分之二的碳足迹来自外商投资企业,这一比例较2012年下降了5.6%。位于沿海省份或经济发达地区的外商投资企业基本上碳足迹最大。(2)一些发达省份的外商投资企业的生产活动主要带动了与之有直接或间接贸易往来的其他省份的碳排放。而在一些能源不富裕的省份,则主要带动了当地 DE 的碳排放。(3)降低外商投资企业碳足迹的最大驱动因素是外商投资企业的碳排放强度,其次是外商投资企业与外商投资企业之间的投入产出关系。促进先进先出工业碳足迹增加的最大驱动因素是 HMT 的最终产品生产,其次是外商投资企业的最终产品生产。然而,不同的驱动因素在不同省份的贡献率不同。本文的研究成果对我国各省合理引进外资、促进外商投资企业碳足迹减少具有重要的研究意义。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.