Toward a phylogenomic classification of magnoliids.

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES American Journal of Botany Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1002/ajb2.16451
Andrew J Helmstetter, Zacky Ezedin, Elton John de Lírio, Sylvia M de Oliveira, Lars W Chatrou, Roy H J Erkens, Isabel Larridon, Kevin Leempoel, Olivier Maurin, Shyamali Roy, Alexandre R Zuntini, William J Baker, Thomas L P Couvreur, Félix Forest, Hervé Sauquet
{"title":"Toward a phylogenomic classification of magnoliids.","authors":"Andrew J Helmstetter, Zacky Ezedin, Elton John de Lírio, Sylvia M de Oliveira, Lars W Chatrou, Roy H J Erkens, Isabel Larridon, Kevin Leempoel, Olivier Maurin, Shyamali Roy, Alexandre R Zuntini, William J Baker, Thomas L P Couvreur, Félix Forest, Hervé Sauquet","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>Magnoliids are a strongly supported clade of angiosperms. Previous phylogenetic studies based primarily on analyses of a limited number of mostly plastid markers have led to the current classification of magnoliids into four orders and 18 families. However, uncertainty remains regarding the placement of several families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the first comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of magnoliids as a whole, we sampled 235 species from 199 (74%) genera and representing all families and most subfamilies and tribes. We analyzed newly generated data from the Angiosperms353 probe set using both coalescent and concatenation analyses and testing the impact of multiple filtering and alignment strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While our results generally provide further support for previously established phylogenetic relationships in both magnoliids as a whole and large families including Annonaceae and Lauraceae, they also provide new evidence for previously ambiguous relationships. In particular, we found support for the position of Hydnoraceae as sister to the remainder of Piperales, though evidence was conflicting, and resolved the backbone of relationships among most genera of Myristicaceae. Different analytical strategies tended to have rather small effects on branch support and topology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although some of our results are limited by low gene recovery for a number of taxa and significant gene tree conflict for some relationships, this study represents a significant step toward reconstructing the evolutionary history of a major lineage of angiosperms. Based on these results, we present an updated phylogenetic classification for magnoliids, recognizing 21 families, summarizing previously established subfamilies and tribes, and describing new tribes for Myristicaceae.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e16451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise: Magnoliids are a strongly supported clade of angiosperms. Previous phylogenetic studies based primarily on analyses of a limited number of mostly plastid markers have led to the current classification of magnoliids into four orders and 18 families. However, uncertainty remains regarding the placement of several families.

Methods: For the first comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of magnoliids as a whole, we sampled 235 species from 199 (74%) genera and representing all families and most subfamilies and tribes. We analyzed newly generated data from the Angiosperms353 probe set using both coalescent and concatenation analyses and testing the impact of multiple filtering and alignment strategies.

Results: While our results generally provide further support for previously established phylogenetic relationships in both magnoliids as a whole and large families including Annonaceae and Lauraceae, they also provide new evidence for previously ambiguous relationships. In particular, we found support for the position of Hydnoraceae as sister to the remainder of Piperales, though evidence was conflicting, and resolved the backbone of relationships among most genera of Myristicaceae. Different analytical strategies tended to have rather small effects on branch support and topology.

Conclusions: Although some of our results are limited by low gene recovery for a number of taxa and significant gene tree conflict for some relationships, this study represents a significant step toward reconstructing the evolutionary history of a major lineage of angiosperms. Based on these results, we present an updated phylogenetic classification for magnoliids, recognizing 21 families, summarizing previously established subfamilies and tribes, and describing new tribes for Myristicaceae.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木兰属植物的系统发育分类研究。
前提:木兰属植物是被子植物中一个得到强有力支持的分支。以往的系统发育研究主要基于对有限数量的质体标记的分析,目前将木兰属植物分为4目18科。然而,关于几个家庭的安置仍然不确定。方法:对木兰属199属(74%)235种进行了系统基因组学分析,涵盖了所有科和大部分亚科和部落。我们分析了来自Angiosperms353探针组的新生成数据,使用了聚结和串联分析,并测试了多种过滤和比对策略的影响。结果:本研究结果为木兰属植物整体和樟科、樟科等大科植物的系统发育关系提供了进一步的支持,同时也为先前不明确的关系提供了新的证据。特别地,我们发现了水杨花科与其他胡椒属的姊妹关系,尽管证据相互矛盾,并解决了肉豆蔻科大多数属之间关系的骨干。不同的分析策略对支路支持和拓扑结构的影响较小。结论:虽然我们的一些研究结果受到一些分类群的低基因恢复和一些关系的显著基因树冲突的限制,但这项研究代表了重建被子植物主要谱系的进化史的重要一步。在此基础上,作者对木兰科植物进行了更新的系统发育分类,确定了21个科,总结了以前建立的亚科和部落,并描述了新的部落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Thermal acclimation of tree species in a tropical Andean city: Exploring the role of species origin and thermal niche. Symbiotic fungi alter plant resource allocation independent of water availability. qPCR-based quantification reveals high plant host-specificity of endophytic colonization levels in leaves. Spatiotemporal variation in population dynamics of a narrow endemic, Ranunculus austro-oreganus. The memory of past water abundance shapes trees 7 years later.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1