Opioid Prescriptions for Low Back Pain among Military-Connected Older Adults Across Multiple Care Systems.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z
Janiece L Taylor, Patricia K Carreño, Shannon Alsobrooks, Alexander G Velosky, Germaine F Herrera, Maxwell Amoako, Megan O'Connell, Ryan C Costantino, Krista B Highland
{"title":"Opioid Prescriptions for Low Back Pain among Military-Connected Older Adults Across Multiple Care Systems.","authors":"Janiece L Taylor, Patricia K Carreño, Shannon Alsobrooks, Alexander G Velosky, Germaine F Herrera, Maxwell Amoako, Megan O'Connell, Ryan C Costantino, Krista B Highland","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Untreated low back pain (LBP) in older adults can lead to disability and development of chronicity. Due to the potential development of medical comorbidities and negative risks associated with pharmacological use, chronic LBP management for older adults requires a responsive approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the probability of (1) opioid prescription receipt and (2) opioid-sedative coprescription, in a sample of military-service-connected patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or TRICARE, ages 30-85 years, receiving care in three systems: VHA, Military Health System (MHS), and nonfederal (civilian) healthcare facilities. Generalized linear models evaluated inequities across intersections of age, race and ethnicity, and care system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was negatively associated with opioid-sedative coprescription receipt (p < 0.001) but was not significantly associated with opioid prescription receipt (p = 0.09). Across both models, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Latine patients were less likely than white patients to receive either outcome (p < 0.001-0.002). Opioid-sedative coprescription probability decreased across age for Asian and Pacific Islander (p = 0.003) and Latine (p = 0.01) patients in the MHS but increased in white patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is imperative that clinicians and healthcare systems provide effective and sustainable treatment for LBP in older adults, including programming, that enhances shared decision-making and whole-health approach championed by the VHA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Untreated low back pain (LBP) in older adults can lead to disability and development of chronicity. Due to the potential development of medical comorbidities and negative risks associated with pharmacological use, chronic LBP management for older adults requires a responsive approach.

Methods: The objective of this study is to evaluate the probability of (1) opioid prescription receipt and (2) opioid-sedative coprescription, in a sample of military-service-connected patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or TRICARE, ages 30-85 years, receiving care in three systems: VHA, Military Health System (MHS), and nonfederal (civilian) healthcare facilities. Generalized linear models evaluated inequities across intersections of age, race and ethnicity, and care system.

Results: Age was negatively associated with opioid-sedative coprescription receipt (p < 0.001) but was not significantly associated with opioid prescription receipt (p = 0.09). Across both models, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Latine patients were less likely than white patients to receive either outcome (p < 0.001-0.002). Opioid-sedative coprescription probability decreased across age for Asian and Pacific Islander (p = 0.003) and Latine (p = 0.01) patients in the MHS but increased in white patients.

Conclusions: It is imperative that clinicians and healthcare systems provide effective and sustainable treatment for LBP in older adults, including programming, that enhances shared decision-making and whole-health approach championed by the VHA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Opioid Prescriptions for Low Back Pain among Military-Connected Older Adults Across Multiple Care Systems. Correction: Anticholinergic Exposure, Drug Dose and Postoperative Delirium: Comparison of Dose-Related and Non-Dose-Related Anticholinergic Burden Scores in a Retrospective Cohort Study of Older Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Patients. Patient-Centric Approach for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in Older People. Osteoporosis in Older Men: Informing Patient Management and Improving Health-Related Outcomes. Exploring Hyperkalemia Risk in Frail Older Patients Using RAAS Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1