"Part of the world again": qualitative enquiry into community participation during inpatient rehabilitation and transition years following severe brain injury.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2443772
Suzanne Currie, Jacinta Douglas, Kate D'Cruz, Di Winkler
{"title":"\"Part of the world again\": qualitative enquiry into community participation during inpatient rehabilitation and transition years following severe brain injury.","authors":"Suzanne Currie, Jacinta Douglas, Kate D'Cruz, Di Winkler","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2443772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand the experience of community and social participation for people with severe ABI during inpatient rehabilitation and the transition years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Constructivist grounded theory methodology informed participant recruitment and data analysis. Adults with ABI were recruited using purposive sampling and data collected via in-depth interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen adults with severe ABI participated, with average age of 36.7 yrs at the time of injury, 9.1 months length of stay of in inpatient rehabilitation, and 4 years post discharge from hospital at time of interviews.The core category developed from thematic analysis was 'lack of focus on community and social participation.' Additional categories included: restricted participation, a focus on impairment and function, acceptance and connection within the community, influence of family and delayed return to community participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community and social participation are recognized as the goal of rehabilitation following ABI; however, experiences shared by participants revealed that community and social participation were not the focus of their rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Implications for rehabilitation: </strong>To support positive holistic outcomes, focus on community and social participation is required within the rehabilitation continuum, using participatory frameworks, contextual goal setting, transparent endorsement for community access and the provision of opportunities for meaningful experiences with family and friends.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2443772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To understand the experience of community and social participation for people with severe ABI during inpatient rehabilitation and the transition years.

Methods: Constructivist grounded theory methodology informed participant recruitment and data analysis. Adults with ABI were recruited using purposive sampling and data collected via in-depth interviews.

Results: Thirteen adults with severe ABI participated, with average age of 36.7 yrs at the time of injury, 9.1 months length of stay of in inpatient rehabilitation, and 4 years post discharge from hospital at time of interviews.The core category developed from thematic analysis was 'lack of focus on community and social participation.' Additional categories included: restricted participation, a focus on impairment and function, acceptance and connection within the community, influence of family and delayed return to community participation.

Conclusion: Community and social participation are recognized as the goal of rehabilitation following ABI; however, experiences shared by participants revealed that community and social participation were not the focus of their rehabilitation.

Implications for rehabilitation: To support positive holistic outcomes, focus on community and social participation is required within the rehabilitation continuum, using participatory frameworks, contextual goal setting, transparent endorsement for community access and the provision of opportunities for meaningful experiences with family and friends.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“再次成为世界的一部分”:对严重脑损伤后住院康复和过渡期间社区参与的定性调查。
目的:了解重度ABI患者在住院康复及过渡期的社区和社会参与体验。方法:建构主义扎根理论方法指导参与者招募和数据分析。有ABI的成年人通过有目的的抽样和深度访谈收集数据。结果:13例重度ABI成人患者参与调查,受访时平均年龄36.7岁,住院康复时间9.1个月,出院时间4年。从专题分析中得出的核心类别是“缺乏对社区和社会参与的关注”。其他类别包括:限制参与、关注缺陷和功能、社区内的接受和联系、家庭的影响和延迟重返社区参与。结论:社区和社会参与是ABI患者康复的目标;然而,参与者分享的经验显示,社区和社会参与并不是他们康复的重点。对康复的影响:为了支持积极的整体结果,在康复连续体中需要关注社区和社会参与,使用参与性框架,情境目标设定,对社区访问的透明认可以及提供与家人和朋友有意义的体验的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Functional network disruptions in youth with concussion using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Treatment of intractable paradoxical herniation by invasive mechanical ventilation with increased positive end-expiratory pressure: a case report. Assessment of arousal recovery after cardiac arrest using diffusion kurtosis MRI with higher b-values: a pilot study. Redefining adjustment after acquired brain injury. Antiseizure medication possibly potentiates ictal bradycardia: a word of caution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1