"We Don't Get Drugs Targeted for Us:" Applying the Integrated Behavioral Model to Understand Why Black Women Chose to Participate in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2448701
Katherine E Ridley-Merriweather, Katharine J Head, Maria Brann, Cynthia Y Wu, Daniel Adan
{"title":"\"We Don't Get Drugs Targeted for Us:\" Applying the Integrated Behavioral Model to Understand Why Black Women Chose to Participate in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial.","authors":"Katherine E Ridley-Merriweather, Katharine J Head, Maria Brann, Cynthia Y Wu, Daniel Adan","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2448701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guided by the integrated behavioral model, the authors interviewed 14 Black breast cancer survivors (<i>N</i> = 14) who had participated in a breast cancer clinical trial. This study aimed to better understand what may motivate Black women to engage in medical research and decide to participate in medical research. Findings revealed that Black women's altruistic desires to serve others and their communities are greatly influenced by the need to leave a \"legacy\" of better treatment for other Black women. The participants mostly learned about clinical trials through communicating with friends, family, or other breast cancer patients and survivors, rather than from their physicians. Many were influenced to participate by other Black breast cancer patients they knew, suggesting that social norms messaging may help alert other Black women about the continuing disparity in clinical trial participation. Finally, the participants in this study demonstrated high levels of involvement not only in seeking out clinical trials, but also in engaging in informed and shared decision-making with their providers about participating in the trials. The findings from this work illuminate important reasons Black women chose to participate in breast cancer clinical trials. Additionally, we offer robust and valuable theoretical and practical implications for researchers, so they can work toward successfully increasing Black women's participation in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"2280-2289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2448701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guided by the integrated behavioral model, the authors interviewed 14 Black breast cancer survivors (N = 14) who had participated in a breast cancer clinical trial. This study aimed to better understand what may motivate Black women to engage in medical research and decide to participate in medical research. Findings revealed that Black women's altruistic desires to serve others and their communities are greatly influenced by the need to leave a "legacy" of better treatment for other Black women. The participants mostly learned about clinical trials through communicating with friends, family, or other breast cancer patients and survivors, rather than from their physicians. Many were influenced to participate by other Black breast cancer patients they knew, suggesting that social norms messaging may help alert other Black women about the continuing disparity in clinical trial participation. Finally, the participants in this study demonstrated high levels of involvement not only in seeking out clinical trials, but also in engaging in informed and shared decision-making with their providers about participating in the trials. The findings from this work illuminate important reasons Black women chose to participate in breast cancer clinical trials. Additionally, we offer robust and valuable theoretical and practical implications for researchers, so they can work toward successfully increasing Black women's participation in clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们没有得到针对我们的药物:”应用综合行为模型来理解为什么黑人妇女选择参加乳腺癌临床试验。
在综合行为模型的指导下,作者采访了14名参加过乳腺癌临床试验的黑人乳腺癌幸存者(N = 14)。这项研究旨在更好地了解是什么促使黑人妇女从事医学研究并决定参与医学研究。调查结果显示,黑人妇女为他人和社区服务的利他主义愿望在很大程度上受到为其他黑人妇女留下更好待遇的“遗产”的需要的影响。参与者大多是通过与朋友、家人或其他乳腺癌患者和幸存者交流来了解临床试验的,而不是从他们的医生那里。许多人是受到她们认识的其他黑人乳腺癌患者的影响而参加试验的,这表明社会规范信息可能有助于提醒其他黑人女性临床试验参与方面的持续差异。最后,本研究的参与者不仅在寻求临床试验方面表现出了高度的参与,而且在参与参与试验的信息和与提供者共同决策方面也表现出了高度的参与。这项工作的发现阐明了黑人妇女选择参加乳腺癌临床试验的重要原因。此外,我们为研究人员提供了强大而有价值的理论和实践意义,因此他们可以成功地提高黑人妇女在临床试验中的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Returning to School Safely: A COVID-19 RCCE Initiative in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Risk Communications and Community Engagement for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Indigenous Peoples in the Americas: The Experience in Colombia. WHO Building Back Better in the European Region: Framing RCCE-IM Capacity Building Before, During and After the COVID-19 Global Emergency. WHO Headquarters Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Response to COVID-19 - Leadership. The World Health Organization's Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1