Observing changes in motoneuron characteristics following distorted sensorimotor input via blood flow restriction.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00603.2024
Mansour Taleshi, Franziska Bubeck, Pascal Brunner, Leonardo Gizzi, Ivan Vujaklija
{"title":"Observing changes in motoneuron characteristics following distorted sensorimotor input via blood flow restriction.","authors":"Mansour Taleshi, Franziska Bubeck, Pascal Brunner, Leonardo Gizzi, Ivan Vujaklija","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00603.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disruption of the blood supply to a limb in conjunction with active movement boosts muscle growth, aids in rehabilitation, and allows controlled exploration of the sensorimotor system. Yet, the underlying neuromechanical changes have not been observed in great detail. This study aims to report the acute neuromuscular effects of temporary blood flow restriction (BFR) through behavioral changes at the level of motor units (MUs) using high-density surface electromyography on the abductor digiti minimi muscle during 20 trapezoidal and sinusoidal isometric force tracking tasks (5 pre-BFR, 5 during BFR, and 10 post-BFR). Unsurprisingly, during BFR, reported discomfort levels increased significantly (ρ < 0.001) regardless of the task (+239% trapezoidal, +228% sinusoidal). However, BFR had very little impact on task tracking performance, though the reconstructed force derived from the underlying neural drive (smoothed cumulative spike train of MUs) deviated substantially during BFR (-40% in trapezoidal, -47% in sinusoidal). Regardless of the condition, the numbers of extracted MUs were consistent (20-26 in trapezoidal, 23-29 in sinusoidal). Interestingly, the interspike interval (ISI) of these units increased by 28% in trapezoidal and 24% in sinusoidal tasks during BFR, with ISI steadily returning to original values post-BFR. These results indicate that acute BFR transiently alters the active MU pool, and MU firing behavior, yet only slightly affects the resulting task performance. However, pre-BFR motor function is gradually restored after BFR release. These findings provide insights into the resulting effects of acute BFR administration and the complex response it elicits from the sensorimotor system.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> To improve our understanding of how acute blood flow restriction (BFR) intervention affects neuromechanical function and motor unit characteristics, we applied high-density surface electromyography on the abductor digiti minimi muscle during isometric trapezoidal and sinusoidal precision force tracking tasks. Although BFR increased discomfort, it minimally affected force tracking performance; however, it did alter the underlying motor unit behavior. These findings further enhance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying BFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"559-570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00603.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disruption of the blood supply to a limb in conjunction with active movement boosts muscle growth, aids in rehabilitation, and allows controlled exploration of the sensorimotor system. Yet, the underlying neuromechanical changes have not been observed in great detail. This study aims to report the acute neuromuscular effects of temporary blood flow restriction (BFR) through behavioral changes at the level of motor units (MUs) using high-density surface electromyography on the abductor digiti minimi muscle during 20 trapezoidal and sinusoidal isometric force tracking tasks (5 pre-BFR, 5 during BFR, and 10 post-BFR). Unsurprisingly, during BFR, reported discomfort levels increased significantly (ρ < 0.001) regardless of the task (+239% trapezoidal, +228% sinusoidal). However, BFR had very little impact on task tracking performance, though the reconstructed force derived from the underlying neural drive (smoothed cumulative spike train of MUs) deviated substantially during BFR (-40% in trapezoidal, -47% in sinusoidal). Regardless of the condition, the numbers of extracted MUs were consistent (20-26 in trapezoidal, 23-29 in sinusoidal). Interestingly, the interspike interval (ISI) of these units increased by 28% in trapezoidal and 24% in sinusoidal tasks during BFR, with ISI steadily returning to original values post-BFR. These results indicate that acute BFR transiently alters the active MU pool, and MU firing behavior, yet only slightly affects the resulting task performance. However, pre-BFR motor function is gradually restored after BFR release. These findings provide insights into the resulting effects of acute BFR administration and the complex response it elicits from the sensorimotor system.NEW & NOTEWORTHY To improve our understanding of how acute blood flow restriction (BFR) intervention affects neuromechanical function and motor unit characteristics, we applied high-density surface electromyography on the abductor digiti minimi muscle during isometric trapezoidal and sinusoidal precision force tracking tasks. Although BFR increased discomfort, it minimally affected force tracking performance; however, it did alter the underlying motor unit behavior. These findings further enhance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying BFR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过血流限制观察感觉运动输入失真后运动神经元特性的变化。
肢体血液供应的中断与积极运动相结合,促进肌肉生长,有助于康复,并允许对感觉运动系统的控制探索。然而,潜在的神经力学变化尚未被详细观察到。本研究旨在通过对20个梯形和正弦等长力追踪任务(BFR前5个,BFR中5个,BFR后10个)的拇外展肌高密度表面肌电图,报道暂时性血流限制(BFR)通过运动单位(MUs)水平的行为改变对急性神经肌肉的影响。不出所料,在BFR期间,报告的不适水平显着增加(ρ < 0.001),无论任务(+239%的梯形,+228%的正弦)。然而,BFR对任务跟踪性能的影响很小,尽管在BFR过程中,来自潜在神经驱动(MUs的平滑累积尖峰序列)的重构力偏差很大(梯形为-40%,正弦为-47%)。无论在何种条件下,提取的微生物数量都是一致的(梯形20-26个,正弦23-29个)。有趣的是,在BFR期间,这些单元的尖峰间间隔(ISI)在梯形任务中增加了28%,在正弦任务中增加了24%,在BFR后ISI稳定地恢复到原始值。这些结果表明,急性BFR会暂时改变活动MU池和MU触发行为,但只会轻微影响最终的任务性能。然而,BFR释放后,BFR前运动功能逐渐恢复。这些发现提供了对急性BFR给药的影响及其引起的感觉运动系统的复杂反应的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
期刊最新文献
Diaphragm Blood Flow: New Avenues for Human Translation. Eight weeks of eccentric training at long-muscle length increases fascicle length independently of adaptations in passive mechanical properties. Cerebrovascular responses to muscle metaboreflex activation in patients living with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Leg stiffness adjustment during hopping by dynamic interaction between the muscle and tendon of the medial gastrocnemius. The legacy of The John B. Pierce Laboratory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1