Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatinine-Based Equations for eGFR Estimation in Pakistanis: Evaluation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation vs the CKD-EPI Pakistan Equation.

Q2 Medicine Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-30 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01
Sibtain Ahmed, Tushar Subash, Huzaifa Ahmed, Ayesha Sadiqa, Sonia Yaqub, Lena Jafri
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatinine-Based Equations for eGFR Estimation in Pakistanis: Evaluation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation vs the CKD-EPI Pakistan Equation.","authors":"Sibtain Ahmed, Tushar Subash, Huzaifa Ahmed, Ayesha Sadiqa, Sonia Yaqub, Lena Jafri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is prevalent in Pakistan, necessitating accurate diagnostic methods. This study evaluates the CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021, CKD-EPI Pak, MDRD, and EKFC equations against creatinine clearance (CrCl) to determine their diagnostic accuracy for CKD in the Pakistani population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>n a retrospective cross-sectional study, data from 2,310 participants aged 18-70 were analyzed at The Aga Khan University in Karachi. Serum creatinine (SCr) and CrCl were recorded, and eGFR was calculated using five equations. Statistical analyses compared eGFR equations with CrCl, assessing sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EPI-Pak exhibited the highest sensitivity (95.15%) and agreement (94.85%) followed by EPI-2009 and EPI-2021 which showed the closest agreement with CrCl. Bland-Altman plots also indicated that EPI-Pak had the best agreement with CrCl.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>EPI-Pak outperformed other equations in estimating eGFR for the Pakistani population, aligning with previous recommendations for South Asians. EKFC, although highly specific, was less effective overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EPI-Pak is the most accurate equation for diagnosing CKD in the Pakistani population. Its clinical implementation could improve CKD diagnosis and patient outcomes. Future studies should further validate these findings with larger, diverse samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"35 4","pages":"285-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is prevalent in Pakistan, necessitating accurate diagnostic methods. This study evaluates the CKD-EPI 2009, CKD-EPI 2021, CKD-EPI Pak, MDRD, and EKFC equations against creatinine clearance (CrCl) to determine their diagnostic accuracy for CKD in the Pakistani population.

Methods: n a retrospective cross-sectional study, data from 2,310 participants aged 18-70 were analyzed at The Aga Khan University in Karachi. Serum creatinine (SCr) and CrCl were recorded, and eGFR was calculated using five equations. Statistical analyses compared eGFR equations with CrCl, assessing sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.

Results: EPI-Pak exhibited the highest sensitivity (95.15%) and agreement (94.85%) followed by EPI-2009 and EPI-2021 which showed the closest agreement with CrCl. Bland-Altman plots also indicated that EPI-Pak had the best agreement with CrCl.

Discussion: EPI-Pak outperformed other equations in estimating eGFR for the Pakistani population, aligning with previous recommendations for South Asians. EKFC, although highly specific, was less effective overall.

Conclusion: EPI-Pak is the most accurate equation for diagnosing CKD in the Pakistani population. Its clinical implementation could improve CKD diagnosis and patient outcomes. Future studies should further validate these findings with larger, diverse samples.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于肌酐的巴基斯坦人 eGFR 估算公式的诊断准确性:欧洲肾功能联盟公式与 CKD-EPI 巴基斯坦公式对比评估。
慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)在巴基斯坦很流行,需要准确的诊断方法。本研究评估了CKD- epi 2009、CKD- epi 2021、CKD- epi Pak、MDRD和EKFC方程对肌酐清除率(CrCl)的影响,以确定其在巴基斯坦人群中诊断CKD的准确性。方法:在一项回顾性横断面研究中,分析了卡拉奇阿迦汗大学2310名18-70岁参与者的数据。记录血清肌酐(SCr)和CrCl,用5个方程计算eGFR。统计分析比较eGFR方程和CrCl,评估敏感性、特异性和预测值。结果:EPI-Pak的敏感性最高(95.15%),一致性最高(94.85%),其次是EPI-2009和EPI-2021,与CrCl的一致性最接近。Bland-Altman图也显示EPI-Pak与CrCl的一致性最好。讨论:EPI-Pak在估计巴基斯坦人口eGFR方面优于其他公式,与先前对南亚人的建议一致。EKFC虽然具有高度特异性,但总体效果较差。结论:EPI-Pak是诊断巴基斯坦人群CKD最准确的公式。它的临床应用可以改善慢性肾病的诊断和患者的预后。未来的研究应该用更大、更多样化的样本进一步验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adolopment of Recommendations for Standardized Reporting of Protein Electrophoresis in Pakistan. Continuous reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and creatinine in Vietnamese children. Correlation Analysis of Direct LDL Measurement and Calculated LDL Methods in Lipid Profile Assessment: A Comprehensive Study. Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatinine-Based Equations for eGFR Estimation in Pakistanis: Evaluation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation vs the CKD-EPI Pakistan Equation. Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data from Mobile Devices into Electronic Health Records: Best Practice Recommendations by the IFCC Committee on Mobile Health and Bioengineering in Laboratory Medicine (C-MHBLM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1