Effects on impulsivity and delay discounting of intermittent theta burst stimulation add-on to dialectical behavioral therapy in borderline personality disorder: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial.

Milenko Kujovic, Christian Bahr, Mathias Riesbeck, Daniel Benz, Martina Deiß, Zsofia Margittai, Sebastian Henges, Dirk Reinermann, Christian Plewnia, Eva Meisenzahl
{"title":"Effects on impulsivity and delay discounting of intermittent theta burst stimulation add-on to dialectical behavioral therapy in borderline personality disorder: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial.","authors":"Milenko Kujovic, Christian Bahr, Mathias Riesbeck, Daniel Benz, Martina Deiß, Zsofia Margittai, Sebastian Henges, Dirk Reinermann, Christian Plewnia, Eva Meisenzahl","doi":"10.1186/s40479-025-00278-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are both effective in treating borderline personality disorder (BPD). Impulsivity and impaired decision-making are prominent features of BPD, and therapeutic interventions targeting these symptoms could lead to significant improvements.</p><p><strong>Objective/hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified rTMS protocol that targets the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, would enhance the therapeutic effects of DBT, leading to greater improvements in impulsivity and decision-making compared with sham stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of iTBS as an add-on to an 8-week DBT program for BPD in a routine inpatient setting. A total of 53 BPD patients were randomly assigned to receive either iTBS (n = 25) or sham stimulation (n = 28) during weeks 4 to 8 of DBT, and 36 patients met the inclusion criteria for the present analysis (≥ 16 of 20 iTBS/sham sessions and assessment of delay discounting). The study endpoints were the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-15 for impulsivity and the Monetary Choice Questionnaire for decision-making/delay discounting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mixed model repeated measures analysis with a 2 × 2 factorial between-subjects design showed a significant overall improvement over time in impulsivity but not in decision-making/delay discounting. No significant differences were found between iTBS and sham, although post hoc tests revealed significant changes in impulsivity in the iTBS group (mean<sub>diff</sub> = -4.7, p = .001, Cohen's d = 0.68) but not in the sham group (mean<sub>diff</sub> = -2.1, p = .077, d = 0.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>iTBS may offer long-term benefits as an add-on treatment to DBT for impulsivity in BPD, suggesting the need for further investigation in larger-scale studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at drks.de (no. DRKS00020413) on January 13, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":48586,"journal":{"name":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","volume":"12 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-025-00278-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are both effective in treating borderline personality disorder (BPD). Impulsivity and impaired decision-making are prominent features of BPD, and therapeutic interventions targeting these symptoms could lead to significant improvements.

Objective/hypothesis: We hypothesized that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified rTMS protocol that targets the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, would enhance the therapeutic effects of DBT, leading to greater improvements in impulsivity and decision-making compared with sham stimulation.

Methods: We performed a single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of iTBS as an add-on to an 8-week DBT program for BPD in a routine inpatient setting. A total of 53 BPD patients were randomly assigned to receive either iTBS (n = 25) or sham stimulation (n = 28) during weeks 4 to 8 of DBT, and 36 patients met the inclusion criteria for the present analysis (≥ 16 of 20 iTBS/sham sessions and assessment of delay discounting). The study endpoints were the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-15 for impulsivity and the Monetary Choice Questionnaire for decision-making/delay discounting.

Results: A mixed model repeated measures analysis with a 2 × 2 factorial between-subjects design showed a significant overall improvement over time in impulsivity but not in decision-making/delay discounting. No significant differences were found between iTBS and sham, although post hoc tests revealed significant changes in impulsivity in the iTBS group (meandiff = -4.7, p = .001, Cohen's d = 0.68) but not in the sham group (meandiff = -2.1, p = .077, d = 0.31).

Conclusions: iTBS may offer long-term benefits as an add-on treatment to DBT for impulsivity in BPD, suggesting the need for further investigation in larger-scale studies.

Trial registration: Registered at drks.de (no. DRKS00020413) on January 13, 2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辩证行为疗法对边缘型人格障碍患者间歇性θ波爆发刺激对冲动性和延迟折扣的影响:一项随机、假对照的试点试验。
背景:辩证行为疗法(DBT)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)均是治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的有效方法。冲动性和决策障碍是BPD的突出特征,针对这些症状的治疗干预可能会导致显著的改善。目的/假设:我们假设间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS),一种针对左背外侧前额叶皮层的改进的rTMS方案,可以增强DBT的治疗效果,与假刺激相比,导致冲动性和决策能力的更大改善。方法:我们进行了一项单盲、随机、假对照的试点研究,以评估iTBS作为8周DBT治疗BPD的附加方案在常规住院患者中的疗效。在DBT的第4至8周,共有53名BPD患者被随机分配接受iTBS (n = 25)或假刺激(n = 28),其中36名患者符合本分析的纳入标准(20次iTBS/假刺激和延迟折扣评估中≥16次)。研究终点为Barratt冲动性量表-15和决策/延迟贴现货币选择问卷。结果:采用2 × 2因子的混合模型重复测量分析显示,随着时间的推移,冲动性总体上有显著改善,但决策/延迟折扣方面没有改善。虽然事后测试显示iTBS组的冲动性有显著变化(meandiff = -4.7, p =),但iTBS组和假手术组之间没有发现显著差异。0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.68),而假手术组无此差异(meandiff = -2.1, p = 0.68)。077, d = 0.31)。结论:iTBS可能作为DBT治疗BPD冲动性的附加治疗提供长期的益处,这表明需要在更大规模的研究中进行进一步的研究。试验报名:在drks.de注册(编号:DRKS00020413)于2020年1月13日发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation provides a platform for researchers and clinicians interested in borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a currently highly challenging psychiatric disorder. Emotion dysregulation is at the core of BPD but also stands on its own as a major pathological component of the underlying neurobiology of various other psychiatric disorders. The journal focuses on the psychological, social and neurobiological aspects of emotion dysregulation as well as epidemiology, phenomenology, pathophysiology, treatment, neurobiology, genetics, and animal models of BPD.
期刊最新文献
Effects on impulsivity and delay discounting of intermittent theta burst stimulation add-on to dialectical behavioral therapy in borderline personality disorder: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial. The relationship between borderline personality features and self-efficacy: the mediating role of school adjustment and the moderating role of social support. The place of subjective emptiness in the structure of personality. Associations between maternal personality dysfunction and emotion suppression and adolescent emotion suppression. You say it's not me: the influence of offering external explanations of rejection and acceptance behavior on the perception of benevolence in borderline personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1