{"title":"Where do we go from here? The personal impact of adverse events and complications in surgeons: Results from a cross-sectional study.","authors":"S O'Meara, E Doherty, K Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medical error is an inevitable part of modern healthcare, with a potential harmful impact for the patient and the surgeon. The phenomenon of negative personal responses for healthcare workers in the aftermath of adverse events is described as the \"second casualty\" and can involve significant physical and psychological distress. We present results from a cross-sectional survey of surgeons and their experience in the aftermath of adverse events or complications.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Following ethical approval an anonymous online survey was distributed to all training and consultant surgeons in the Republic of Ireland. Data collected included basic demographics, personal response to an adverse event, coping strategies, contributing factors and perception of potential support structures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 responses were received representing surgeons with a broad range of experience and specialty. Eighty-nine percent (n = 98) of surgeons described negative psychological symptoms in the aftermath of adverse events. The predominant responses were anxiety, guilt and low mood. Sixty-seven percent (n = 74) reported that their training did not prepare them for the personal impact of events but found informal peer and family support to be beneficial and were open to the implementation of formal support structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeons suffer in the aftermath of negative outcomes and feel unprepared to manage the personal consequences. Institutions and representative bodies must step forward to change culture and develop supports for surgeons in the aftermath of adverse events and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.01.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Medical error is an inevitable part of modern healthcare, with a potential harmful impact for the patient and the surgeon. The phenomenon of negative personal responses for healthcare workers in the aftermath of adverse events is described as the "second casualty" and can involve significant physical and psychological distress. We present results from a cross-sectional survey of surgeons and their experience in the aftermath of adverse events or complications.
Subjects and methods: Following ethical approval an anonymous online survey was distributed to all training and consultant surgeons in the Republic of Ireland. Data collected included basic demographics, personal response to an adverse event, coping strategies, contributing factors and perception of potential support structures.
Results: A total of 110 responses were received representing surgeons with a broad range of experience and specialty. Eighty-nine percent (n = 98) of surgeons described negative psychological symptoms in the aftermath of adverse events. The predominant responses were anxiety, guilt and low mood. Sixty-seven percent (n = 74) reported that their training did not prepare them for the personal impact of events but found informal peer and family support to be beneficial and were open to the implementation of formal support structures.
Conclusion: Surgeons suffer in the aftermath of negative outcomes and feel unprepared to manage the personal consequences. Institutions and representative bodies must step forward to change culture and develop supports for surgeons in the aftermath of adverse events and complications.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.