Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation.

Richard A W Felius, Michiel Punt, Natasja C Wouda, Marieke Geerars, Sjoerd M Bruijn, Harriet Wittink, Jaap H van Dieën
{"title":"Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation.","authors":"Richard A W Felius, Michiel Punt, Natasja C Wouda, Marieke Geerars, Sjoerd M Bruijn, Harriet Wittink, Jaap H van Dieën","doi":"10.1177/15459683241304350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How gait changes during the early stages of stoke rehabilitation, and which patient characteristics are associated with these changes is still largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>he first objective was to describe the changes in gait during stroke rehabilitation. Secondly, we determined how various patient characteristics were associated with the rate of change of gait over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were measured every 3 weeks during stroke rehabilitation. The assessment consisted of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) based 2-minute walk test (2MWT), 3 IMU-based balance tests, and standard clinical tests. In the 2MWT, participants were equipped with 3 IMUs, from which speed, variability, asymmetry, and smoothness were calculated. The changes in gait were examined from admission to discharge at an individual level. The effect of patient characteristics on the rate of change of the gait features over time was assessed with growth models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 Trajectories from 72 participants were analyzed. On an individual basis, speed increased in 32 trajectories. Only a few trajectories exhibited significant changes in variability, asymmetry, and smoothness over the clinical rehabilitation period. The growth models revealed a significant increase in speed and decrease in variability and smoothness. Only the Berg Balance Scale and gait speed at onset were (negatively) associated with the rates of change of speed and smoothness, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a substantial variability in the gait-feature outcomes and their progression in individuals after stroke during clinical rehabilitation. The patient characteristics studied had limited associations with the rate of change of gait features over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"15459683241304350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241304350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: How gait changes during the early stages of stoke rehabilitation, and which patient characteristics are associated with these changes is still largely unknown.

Objective: he first objective was to describe the changes in gait during stroke rehabilitation. Secondly, we determined how various patient characteristics were associated with the rate of change of gait over time.

Methods: Participants were measured every 3 weeks during stroke rehabilitation. The assessment consisted of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) based 2-minute walk test (2MWT), 3 IMU-based balance tests, and standard clinical tests. In the 2MWT, participants were equipped with 3 IMUs, from which speed, variability, asymmetry, and smoothness were calculated. The changes in gait were examined from admission to discharge at an individual level. The effect of patient characteristics on the rate of change of the gait features over time was assessed with growth models.

Results: A total of 81 Trajectories from 72 participants were analyzed. On an individual basis, speed increased in 32 trajectories. Only a few trajectories exhibited significant changes in variability, asymmetry, and smoothness over the clinical rehabilitation period. The growth models revealed a significant increase in speed and decrease in variability and smoothness. Only the Berg Balance Scale and gait speed at onset were (negatively) associated with the rates of change of speed and smoothness, respectively.

Conclusion: We found a substantial variability in the gait-feature outcomes and their progression in individuals after stroke during clinical rehabilitation. The patient characteristics studied had limited associations with the rate of change of gait features over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中临床康复中步态恢复轨迹的绘制。
背景:在中风康复的早期阶段步态是如何变化的,以及哪些患者特征与这些变化相关,在很大程度上仍然是未知的。目的:第一个目的是描述中风康复期间步态的变化。其次,我们确定了各种患者特征与步态变化率随时间的关系。方法:参与者在脑卒中康复期间每3周进行一次测量。评估包括基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的2分钟步行测试(2MWT), 3个基于IMU的平衡测试和标准临床测试。在2MWT中,参与者配备了3个imu,从中计算速度,变异性,不对称性和平滑度。在个体水平上检查步态的变化从入院到出院。随着时间的推移,患者特征对步态特征变化率的影响通过生长模型进行评估。结果:共分析了72名参与者的81条轨迹。在个体的基础上,32条轨迹的速度增加了。在临床康复期间,只有少数轨迹在变异性、不对称性和平滑性方面表现出显著的变化。生长模型显示速度显著增加,变异度和平滑度显著降低。只有伯格平衡量表和开始时的步态速度分别与速度和平滑度的变化率(负)相关。结论:我们发现在临床康复过程中,中风患者的步态特征结果及其进展存在很大的可变性。研究的患者特征与步态特征随时间变化的速度有有限的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1