Proteomic profiling of the large‐vessel vasculitis spectrum identifies shared signatures of innate immune activation and stromal remodelling

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Arthritis & Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1002/art.43110
Robert T. Maughan, Erin MacDonald‐Dunlop, Lubna Haroon‐Rashid, Louise Sorensen, Natalie Chaddock, Shauna Masters, Andrew Porter, Marta Peverelli, Charis Pericleous, Andrew Hutchings, James Robinson, Taryn Youngstein, Raashid A. Luqmani, Justin C. Mason, Ann W. Morgan, James E. Peters
{"title":"Proteomic profiling of the large‐vessel vasculitis spectrum identifies shared signatures of innate immune activation and stromal remodelling","authors":"Robert T. Maughan, Erin MacDonald‐Dunlop, Lubna Haroon‐Rashid, Louise Sorensen, Natalie Chaddock, Shauna Masters, Andrew Porter, Marta Peverelli, Charis Pericleous, Andrew Hutchings, James Robinson, Taryn Youngstein, Raashid A. Luqmani, Justin C. Mason, Ann W. Morgan, James E. Peters","doi":"10.1002/art.43110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundTakayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), the most common forms of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), can result in serious morbidity. Understanding the molecular basis of LVV should aid in developing better biomarkers and treatments.MethodsPlasma proteomic profiling of 184 proteins was performed in two cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients with established TAK (n=96) and large‐vessel GCA (LV‐GCA, n=35) in addition to healthy control participants (HCs, n=35). Cohort 2 comprised patients presenting acutely with possible cranial‐GCA in whom the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed (C‐GCA, n=150) or excluded (Not C‐GCA, n=89). Proteomic findings were compared to published transcriptomic data from LVV‐affected arteries.ResultsIn Cohort 1, comparison to HCs revealed 52 differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in TAK and 72 in LV‐GCA. Within‐case analyses identified 16 and 18 disease activity‐associated proteins in TAK and LV‐GCA, respectively. In Cohort 2, comparing C‐GCA versus Not C‐GCA revealed 31 DAPs. Analysis within C‐GCA cases suggested the presence of distinct endotypes, with more pronounced proteomic changes in the biopsy‐proven subgroup. Cross‐comparison of TAK, LV‐GCA and biopsy‐proven C‐GCA revealed highly similar plasma proteomic profiles, with 26 shared DAPs including IL6, monocyte/macrophage related proteins (CCL7, CSF1), tissue remodelling proteins (TIMP1, TNC) and novel associations (TNFSF14, IL7R). Plasma proteomic findings reflected LVV arterial phenotype; for 42% of DAPs, the corresponding gene was differentially expressed in tissue.ConclusionsThese findings suggest shared pathobiology across the LVV spectrum involving innate immunity, lymphocyte homeostasis and tissue remodelling. Network‐based analyses highlighted immune‐stromal crosstalk and identified novel therapeutic targets (e.g. TNFSF14).","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundTakayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), the most common forms of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), can result in serious morbidity. Understanding the molecular basis of LVV should aid in developing better biomarkers and treatments.MethodsPlasma proteomic profiling of 184 proteins was performed in two cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients with established TAK (n=96) and large‐vessel GCA (LV‐GCA, n=35) in addition to healthy control participants (HCs, n=35). Cohort 2 comprised patients presenting acutely with possible cranial‐GCA in whom the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed (C‐GCA, n=150) or excluded (Not C‐GCA, n=89). Proteomic findings were compared to published transcriptomic data from LVV‐affected arteries.ResultsIn Cohort 1, comparison to HCs revealed 52 differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in TAK and 72 in LV‐GCA. Within‐case analyses identified 16 and 18 disease activity‐associated proteins in TAK and LV‐GCA, respectively. In Cohort 2, comparing C‐GCA versus Not C‐GCA revealed 31 DAPs. Analysis within C‐GCA cases suggested the presence of distinct endotypes, with more pronounced proteomic changes in the biopsy‐proven subgroup. Cross‐comparison of TAK, LV‐GCA and biopsy‐proven C‐GCA revealed highly similar plasma proteomic profiles, with 26 shared DAPs including IL6, monocyte/macrophage related proteins (CCL7, CSF1), tissue remodelling proteins (TIMP1, TNC) and novel associations (TNFSF14, IL7R). Plasma proteomic findings reflected LVV arterial phenotype; for 42% of DAPs, the corresponding gene was differentially expressed in tissue.ConclusionsThese findings suggest shared pathobiology across the LVV spectrum involving innate immunity, lymphocyte homeostasis and tissue remodelling. Network‐based analyses highlighted immune‐stromal crosstalk and identified novel therapeutic targets (e.g. TNFSF14).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大血管炎谱的蛋白质组学分析确定了先天免疫激活和基质重塑的共同特征
背景:高松动脉炎(taku arteritis, TAK)和巨细胞动脉炎(giant cell arteritis, GCA)是大血管炎(LVV)最常见的形式,可导致严重的发病率。了解LVV的分子基础有助于开发更好的生物标志物和治疗方法。方法对184个蛋白进行血浆蛋白质组学分析。队列1包括已确诊的TAK (n=96)和大血管GCA (LV - GCA, n=35)患者以及健康对照组(hc, n=35)。队列2包括急性表现为可能的颅内GCA的患者,这些患者随后确诊(C‐GCA, n=150)或排除(非C‐GCA, n=89)。将蛋白质组学结果与已发表的左室静脉影响动脉的转录组学数据进行比较。结果在队列1中,与hcc比较发现TAK中有52个差异丰富蛋白(DAPs), LV - GCA中有72个差异丰富蛋白(DAPs)。在病例分析中,分别在TAK和LV - GCA中鉴定出16种和18种疾病活性相关蛋白。在队列2中,比较C - GCA与非C - GCA发现31个DAPs。对C - GCA病例的分析表明存在不同的内型,在活检证实的亚组中有更明显的蛋白质组变化。TAK、LV - GCA和活检证实的C - GCA的交叉比较显示出高度相似的血浆蛋白质组学特征,有26个共享的dap,包括IL6、单核细胞/巨噬细胞相关蛋白(CCL7、CSF1)、组织重塑蛋白(TIMP1、TNC)和新的关联蛋白(TNFSF14、IL7R)。血浆蛋白质组学结果反映左室动脉表型;42%的DAPs对应基因在组织中有差异表达。结论本研究结果提示左心室频谱的共同病理生物学涉及先天免疫、淋巴细胞稳态和组织重塑。基于网络的分析强调了免疫间质串扰,并确定了新的治疗靶点(如TNFSF14)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Concordance Between Ultrasound and Physical Examination in Enthesitis Assessment: A Call for Further Investigation Identification of pathogenic PD-1+CD8+ T cells for effective chimeric antigen receptor therapy in a murine model of Sjögren's disease Minimal Tofacitinib dose for Maintenance in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Real world data from a Resource-limited setting Issue Information In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1