Meta-Analysis: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1111/apt.18495
Matthew K. W. Chu, Alice S. Day, Lani Broad, Samuel P. Costello, Suzanne Edwards, Robert V. Bryant
{"title":"Meta-Analysis: Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in Adults With Ulcerative Colitis","authors":"Matthew K. W. Chu,&nbsp;Alice S. Day,&nbsp;Lani Broad,&nbsp;Samuel P. Costello,&nbsp;Suzanne Edwards,&nbsp;Robert V. Bryant","doi":"10.1111/apt.18495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an established dietary therapy for Crohn's disease but its role in ulcerative colitis remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the efficacy of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis and compare variations in treatment protocols, safety, tolerability and adherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Emcare, CINAHL, Web of Science and trial registries for articles published from inception until July 21, 2024. We included all experimental and observational studies that described the use of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022319584).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 3273 articles screened, we included 10 studies (334 adults). Overall, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for ulcerative colitis remission induction (median follow-up 14 days, risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.85; 2 studies). In acute severe ulcerative colitis, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for corticosteroid failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.20; 2 studies) or risk of colectomy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, <i>n</i> = 2 studies) during index admission. The pooled discontinuation rate was 3% (95% CI 0–10; 9 studies). There was heterogeneity in trial design, methodology and assessment of outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EEN was well tolerated with low therapy discontinuation in adults with active ulcerative colitis. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of EEN as an adjunctive therapy to standard of care. Further, well-designed studies with reproducible methodology and endpoints are necessary to evaluate its effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Registry Number for Systematic Review</h3>\n \n <p>PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022319584.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 5","pages":"756-775"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an established dietary therapy for Crohn's disease but its role in ulcerative colitis remains unclear.

Aims

To investigate the efficacy of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis and compare variations in treatment protocols, safety, tolerability and adherence.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Emcare, CINAHL, Web of Science and trial registries for articles published from inception until July 21, 2024. We included all experimental and observational studies that described the use of EEN in adults with active ulcerative colitis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022319584).

Results

Of 3273 articles screened, we included 10 studies (334 adults). Overall, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for ulcerative colitis remission induction (median follow-up 14 days, risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.85; 2 studies). In acute severe ulcerative colitis, there was no difference between EEN and comparator for corticosteroid failure (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.20; 2 studies) or risk of colectomy (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51–1.51, n = 2 studies) during index admission. The pooled discontinuation rate was 3% (95% CI 0–10; 9 studies). There was heterogeneity in trial design, methodology and assessment of outcomes.

Conclusion

EEN was well tolerated with low therapy discontinuation in adults with active ulcerative colitis. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of EEN as an adjunctive therapy to standard of care. Further, well-designed studies with reproducible methodology and endpoints are necessary to evaluate its effectiveness.

Registry Number for Systematic Review

PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022319584.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荟萃分析:单独肠内营养治疗溃疡性结肠炎
纯肠内营养(EEN)是一种治疗克罗恩病的成熟饮食疗法,但它在溃疡性结肠炎中的作用仍不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effects of a 12-Week Mediterranean-Type Time-Restricted Feeding Protocol in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial—The ‘CHRONO-NAFLD Project’ Letter: Iron Metabolism in SLD—A Complex Puzzle That Requires Further Evaluation Editorial: Beyond Clinical Trials—Real-World Data Suggest Usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in MASLD Treatment. Authors' Reply Editorial: Beyond Clinical Trials—Real-World Data Suggest Usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in MASLD Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1