PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort
Luca Ceriani, Lisa Milan, Maria Cristina Pirosa, Maurizio Martelli, Teresa Ruberto, Luciano Cascione, Peter W.M. Johnson, Andrew J. Davies, Giovannino Ciccone, Emanuele Zucca
{"title":"PET-Based Risk Stratification in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Analysis of Different Segmentation Methods in the IELSG37 Trial Patient Cohort","authors":"Luca Ceriani, Lisa Milan, Maria Cristina Pirosa, Maurizio Martelli, Teresa Ruberto, Luciano Cascione, Peter W.M. Johnson, Andrew J. Davies, Giovannino Ciccone, Emanuele Zucca","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.268874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Standardizing tumor measurement on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET is crucial for the routine clinical use of powerful PET-derived lymphoma prognostic factors such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The recent proposal of an SUV of 4 as a new reference segmentation threshold for most aggressive lymphomas may homogenize volume-based metrics and facilitate their clinical application. <strong>Methods:</strong> This study compared MTV and TLG in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients estimated using an SUV of 4 and the current threshold at 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub>. Baseline PET metrics were evaluated in 501 PMBCL patients from the IELSG37 trial. <strong>Results:</strong> Median MTV and TLG estimated with the 25% of SUV<sub>max</sub> threshold were significantly lower than those obtained with the new reference threshold; however, an extremely high correlation was observed between the methods for both MTV (<em>r</em> = 0.95) and TLG (<em>r</em> = 0.99), resulting in superimposable prognostic power. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> These findings support the routine use of an SUV of 4 for volumetric measurements in PMBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Standardizing tumor measurement on 18F-FDG PET is crucial for the routine clinical use of powerful PET-derived lymphoma prognostic factors such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The recent proposal of an SUV of 4 as a new reference segmentation threshold for most aggressive lymphomas may homogenize volume-based metrics and facilitate their clinical application. Methods: This study compared MTV and TLG in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients estimated using an SUV of 4 and the current threshold at 25% of SUVmax. Baseline PET metrics were evaluated in 501 PMBCL patients from the IELSG37 trial. Results: Median MTV and TLG estimated with the 25% of SUVmax threshold were significantly lower than those obtained with the new reference threshold; however, an extremely high correlation was observed between the methods for both MTV (r = 0.95) and TLG (r = 0.99), resulting in superimposable prognostic power. Conclusion: These findings support the routine use of an SUV of 4 for volumetric measurements in PMBCL.