Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Individuals With Twin Pregnancies and Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1097/aog.0000000000005830
Hiba J Mustafa,May Abiad,William A Grobman,Kelly M Mosesso,Joanne K Daggy,Ali Javinani,Asma Khalil,Vincenzo Berghella,Mark B Landon,Alireza A Shamshirsaz
{"title":"Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Individuals With Twin Pregnancies and Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries.","authors":"Hiba J Mustafa,May Abiad,William A Grobman,Kelly M Mosesso,Joanne K Daggy,Ali Javinani,Asma Khalil,Vincenzo Berghella,Mark B Landon,Alireza A Shamshirsaz","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000005830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo investigate short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes in individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA cross-sectional study of live-birth data was conducted between 2014 and 2021 in the United States. Individuals with more than two prior cesarean deliveries and multiple gestations higher than twins were excluded. The inclusion criteria were individuals with twin pregnancies who had two prior cesarean deliveries and underwent TOLAC. Comparison groups included 1) individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent elective cesarean delivery, 2) those with twin pregnancies and one prior cesarean delivery who underwent TOLAC, and 3) those with singleton pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC. The primary outcomes were composite measures of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Investigated maternal outcomes included chorioamnionitis, transfusion, hysterectomy, uterine rupture, and admission to the intensive care unit. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) was also evaluated. Neonatal outcomes included a 5-minute Apgar score 3 or higher, assisted ventilation, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, use of surfactant or antibiotics, and seizures. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted. Bonferroni adjustment was applied, and adjusted P<0.05 was considered significant.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 92,665 pregnant individuals and 106,361 neonates were included in the analysis. Vaginal birth after cesarean was achieved in 37.8% (239/632) of individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC, compared with 61.5% (2,271/3,693) of individuals with twin pregnancies and one prior cesarean delivery who underwent TOLAC and 58.0% (45,834/78,969) of individuals with singleton pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC (P<.001). Both composite maternal and neonatal morbidity were not significantly different between other twin groups and individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC. None of the 632 individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC had uterine rupture. After adjustments with covariates, the odds of VBAC were more than twice as great in individuals with twin pregnancies and one prior cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.41; 95% CI, 2.01-2.90) and in those with singleton pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries (aOR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.88-2.65) compared with individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nNo significant difference in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected in twin pregnancies among individuals with two prior cesarean deliveries, although the chance of VBAC was 37.8%.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To investigate short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes in individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). METHODS A cross-sectional study of live-birth data was conducted between 2014 and 2021 in the United States. Individuals with more than two prior cesarean deliveries and multiple gestations higher than twins were excluded. The inclusion criteria were individuals with twin pregnancies who had two prior cesarean deliveries and underwent TOLAC. Comparison groups included 1) individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent elective cesarean delivery, 2) those with twin pregnancies and one prior cesarean delivery who underwent TOLAC, and 3) those with singleton pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC. The primary outcomes were composite measures of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Investigated maternal outcomes included chorioamnionitis, transfusion, hysterectomy, uterine rupture, and admission to the intensive care unit. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) was also evaluated. Neonatal outcomes included a 5-minute Apgar score 3 or higher, assisted ventilation, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, use of surfactant or antibiotics, and seizures. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted. Bonferroni adjustment was applied, and adjusted P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS A total of 92,665 pregnant individuals and 106,361 neonates were included in the analysis. Vaginal birth after cesarean was achieved in 37.8% (239/632) of individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC, compared with 61.5% (2,271/3,693) of individuals with twin pregnancies and one prior cesarean delivery who underwent TOLAC and 58.0% (45,834/78,969) of individuals with singleton pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC (P<.001). Both composite maternal and neonatal morbidity were not significantly different between other twin groups and individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC. None of the 632 individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries who underwent TOLAC had uterine rupture. After adjustments with covariates, the odds of VBAC were more than twice as great in individuals with twin pregnancies and one prior cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.41; 95% CI, 2.01-2.90) and in those with singleton pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries (aOR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.88-2.65) compared with individuals with twin pregnancies and two prior cesarean deliveries. CONCLUSION No significant difference in adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected in twin pregnancies among individuals with two prior cesarean deliveries, although the chance of VBAC was 37.8%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双胎妊娠和两次剖宫产的个体剖宫产后分娩的试验。
目的探讨双胎妊娠和两次剖宫产患者接受剖宫产后试产(TOLAC)的短期孕产妇和新生儿结局。方法对2014年至2021年在美国进行的活产数据进行横断面研究。既往有两次以上剖宫产和多胎妊娠高于双胞胎的个体被排除在外。纳入标准是有两次剖宫产史并接受TOLAC的双胎妊娠个体。对照组包括:(1)双胎妊娠且有两次剖宫产史的个体选择选择性剖宫产,(2)双胎妊娠且有一次剖宫产史的个体选择TOLAC,(3)单胎妊娠且有两次剖宫产史的个体选择TOLAC。主要结局是孕产妇和新生儿发病率的综合指标。调查的产妇结局包括绒毛膜羊膜炎、输血、子宫切除术、子宫破裂和入住重症监护病房。剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)也进行了评估。新生儿结局包括5分钟Apgar评分3分或更高,辅助通气,进入新生儿重症监护病房,使用表面活性剂或抗生素,以及癫痫发作。进行了单变量和多变量分析。采用Bonferroni校正,校正后P<0.05被认为是显著的。结果共纳入92,665例孕妇和106,361例新生儿。双胎妊娠和有两次剖宫产史的患者中,37.8%(239/632)剖宫产后阴道分娩接受TOLAC,而双胎妊娠和有一次剖宫产史的患者中,61.5%(2,271/3,693)接受TOLAC,单胎妊娠和有两次剖宫产史的患者中,58.0%(45,834/78,969)接受TOLAC (P<.001)。产妇和新生儿的综合发病率在其他双胞胎组和双胎妊娠和两次剖宫产接受TOLAC的个体之间没有显著差异。632例双胎妊娠和两次剖宫产的患者均未发生子宫破裂。经协变量调整后,双胎妊娠和一次剖宫产的患者发生VBAC的几率是双胎妊娠和一次剖宫产的患者的两倍多(调整优势比[aOR] 2.41;95% CI, 2.01-2.90)以及单胎妊娠和两次剖宫产史(aOR 2.23;95% CI, 1.88-2.65),与双胎妊娠和两次剖宫产的个体相比。结论有两次剖宫产史的双胎妊娠患者发生VBAC的几率为37.8%,但产妇和新生儿的不良结局无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
In Reply. Pharmacologic Interventions for Endometriosis-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. In Reply. ACOG Publications: April 2026. ACOG Publications: February 2026: Correction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1