Migrant returnees as (anti‐)migration messengers? A case of street‐level representative bureaucracy in Senegal

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY International Migration Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1111/imig.13382
Katerina Glyniadaki, Nora Ratzmann, Julia Stier
{"title":"Migrant returnees as (anti‐)migration messengers? A case of street‐level representative bureaucracy in Senegal","authors":"Katerina Glyniadaki, Nora Ratzmann, Julia Stier","doi":"10.1111/imig.13382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International organizations and foreign‐funded NGOs run campaigns in Senegal to raise awareness of the perils of irregular migration. To increase their effectiveness, these organizations often enlist local migrant returnees to share their personal migration experiences and transmit an anti‐irregular migration message to their compatriots. This article examines whether policymakers' assumptions regarding the representativeness of migrant returnees operating as (anti‐)migration messengers in terms of shared identities corresponds to reality at the street level. It draws from theories of street‐level bureaucracy and representative bureaucracy and is based on 31 qualitative interviews with migrant returnees and experts. The study shows that migrant returnees engaged in migration information campaigns are not as representative of the local population as envisaged by policymakers, potentially impacting policy outcomes. They stand out from their compatriots in terms of skillsets and social status – partly because of the selection mechanism employed by organizations and partly because of the training and capacity‐building efforts directed at migrant returnees.","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International organizations and foreign‐funded NGOs run campaigns in Senegal to raise awareness of the perils of irregular migration. To increase their effectiveness, these organizations often enlist local migrant returnees to share their personal migration experiences and transmit an anti‐irregular migration message to their compatriots. This article examines whether policymakers' assumptions regarding the representativeness of migrant returnees operating as (anti‐)migration messengers in terms of shared identities corresponds to reality at the street level. It draws from theories of street‐level bureaucracy and representative bureaucracy and is based on 31 qualitative interviews with migrant returnees and experts. The study shows that migrant returnees engaged in migration information campaigns are not as representative of the local population as envisaged by policymakers, potentially impacting policy outcomes. They stand out from their compatriots in terms of skillsets and social status – partly because of the selection mechanism employed by organizations and partly because of the training and capacity‐building efforts directed at migrant returnees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
返乡移民是(反)移民信使?塞内加尔街头代表性官僚机构的案例
国际组织和外国资助的非政府组织在塞内加尔开展宣传活动,提高人们对非正常移徙危害的认识。为了提高活动的效果,这些组织通常会邀请当地的回国移民分享他们的个人移民经历,并向他们的同胞传达反非正常移民的信息。本文探讨了政策制定者对作为(反)移民信使的移民归国者在共同身份方面的代表性的假设是否符合街道层面的实际情况。本研究借鉴了街头官僚制和代表性官僚制的理论,并以对返乡农民工和专家的 31 次定性访谈为基础。研究表明,参与移民信息宣传活动的返乡移民并不像政策制定者所设想的那样代表当地人口,这可能会影响政策结果。他们在技能组合和社会地位方面都有别于同胞--部分原因是组织采用的选拔机制,部分原因是针对移民回归者的培训和能力建设工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: International Migration is a refereed, policy oriented journal on migration issues as analysed by demographers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists from all parts of the world. It covers the entire field of policy relevance in international migration, giving attention not only to a breadth of topics reflective of policy concerns, but also attention to coverage of all regions of the world and to comparative policy.
期刊最新文献
From South Asia to the United Arab Emirates with hope: The subjective well‐being of blue‐collar migrant workers revisited The role of sender credibility in migration information campaigns From differences to relations: Towards diaspora‐forming processes The demographic future of migration is African Correction to ‘knowledge is confused’: Rethinking pull factors in light of asylum and refugee integration policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1