Colin Cros;Pierre-Olivier Amblard;Christophe Prieur;Jean-François Da Rocha
{"title":"Revisiting Split Covariance Intersection: Correlated Components and Optimality","authors":"Colin Cros;Pierre-Olivier Amblard;Christophe Prieur;Jean-François Da Rocha","doi":"10.1109/TAC.2025.3530854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linear fusion is a cornerstone of estimation theory. Implementing optimal linear fusion requires knowledge of the covariance of the vector of errors associated with all the estimators. In distributed or cooperative systems, the cross-covariance terms cannot be computed, and to avoid underestimating the estimation error, conservative fusions must be performed. A conservative fusion provides a fused estimator with a covariance bound that is guaranteed to be larger than the true, but computationally intractable, covariance of the error. Previous research by (Reinhardt et al., 2013, 2015) proved that if no additional assumption is made about the errors of the estimators, the minimal bound for fusing two estimators is given by a fusion called covariance intersection (CI). In distributed systems, the estimation errors contain independent and correlated terms induced by the measurement noises and the process noise. In this case, CI is no longer the optimal method. Split covariance intersection (SCI) has been developed to take advantage of the uncorrelated components. This article extends SCI to also take advantage of the correlated components. Then, it is proved that the new fusion provides the optimal conservative fusion bounds for two estimators, generalizing the optimality of CI to a wider class of fusion schemes. The benefits of this extension are demonstrated in simulations.","PeriodicalId":13201,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","volume":"70 7","pages":"4593-4607"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10844528/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Linear fusion is a cornerstone of estimation theory. Implementing optimal linear fusion requires knowledge of the covariance of the vector of errors associated with all the estimators. In distributed or cooperative systems, the cross-covariance terms cannot be computed, and to avoid underestimating the estimation error, conservative fusions must be performed. A conservative fusion provides a fused estimator with a covariance bound that is guaranteed to be larger than the true, but computationally intractable, covariance of the error. Previous research by (Reinhardt et al., 2013, 2015) proved that if no additional assumption is made about the errors of the estimators, the minimal bound for fusing two estimators is given by a fusion called covariance intersection (CI). In distributed systems, the estimation errors contain independent and correlated terms induced by the measurement noises and the process noise. In this case, CI is no longer the optimal method. Split covariance intersection (SCI) has been developed to take advantage of the uncorrelated components. This article extends SCI to also take advantage of the correlated components. Then, it is proved that the new fusion provides the optimal conservative fusion bounds for two estimators, generalizing the optimality of CI to a wider class of fusion schemes. The benefits of this extension are demonstrated in simulations.
期刊介绍:
In the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, the IEEE Control Systems Society publishes high-quality papers on the theory, design, and applications of control engineering. Two types of contributions are regularly considered:
1) Papers: Presentation of significant research, development, or application of control concepts.
2) Technical Notes and Correspondence: Brief technical notes, comments on published areas or established control topics, corrections to papers and notes published in the Transactions.
In addition, special papers (tutorials, surveys, and perspectives on the theory and applications of control systems topics) are solicited.