Revisiting Split Covariance Intersection: Correlated Components and Optimality

IF 7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1109/TAC.2025.3530854
Colin Cros;Pierre-Olivier Amblard;Christophe Prieur;Jean-François Da Rocha
{"title":"Revisiting Split Covariance Intersection: Correlated Components and Optimality","authors":"Colin Cros;Pierre-Olivier Amblard;Christophe Prieur;Jean-François Da Rocha","doi":"10.1109/TAC.2025.3530854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linear fusion is a cornerstone of estimation theory. Implementing optimal linear fusion requires knowledge of the covariance of the vector of errors associated with all the estimators. In distributed or cooperative systems, the cross-covariance terms cannot be computed, and to avoid underestimating the estimation error, conservative fusions must be performed. A conservative fusion provides a fused estimator with a covariance bound that is guaranteed to be larger than the true, but computationally intractable, covariance of the error. Previous research by (Reinhardt et al., 2013, 2015) proved that if no additional assumption is made about the errors of the estimators, the minimal bound for fusing two estimators is given by a fusion called covariance intersection (CI). In distributed systems, the estimation errors contain independent and correlated terms induced by the measurement noises and the process noise. In this case, CI is no longer the optimal method. Split covariance intersection (SCI) has been developed to take advantage of the uncorrelated components. This article extends SCI to also take advantage of the correlated components. Then, it is proved that the new fusion provides the optimal conservative fusion bounds for two estimators, generalizing the optimality of CI to a wider class of fusion schemes. The benefits of this extension are demonstrated in simulations.","PeriodicalId":13201,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","volume":"70 7","pages":"4593-4607"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10844528/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linear fusion is a cornerstone of estimation theory. Implementing optimal linear fusion requires knowledge of the covariance of the vector of errors associated with all the estimators. In distributed or cooperative systems, the cross-covariance terms cannot be computed, and to avoid underestimating the estimation error, conservative fusions must be performed. A conservative fusion provides a fused estimator with a covariance bound that is guaranteed to be larger than the true, but computationally intractable, covariance of the error. Previous research by (Reinhardt et al., 2013, 2015) proved that if no additional assumption is made about the errors of the estimators, the minimal bound for fusing two estimators is given by a fusion called covariance intersection (CI). In distributed systems, the estimation errors contain independent and correlated terms induced by the measurement noises and the process noise. In this case, CI is no longer the optimal method. Split covariance intersection (SCI) has been developed to take advantage of the uncorrelated components. This article extends SCI to also take advantage of the correlated components. Then, it is proved that the new fusion provides the optimal conservative fusion bounds for two estimators, generalizing the optimality of CI to a wider class of fusion schemes. The benefits of this extension are demonstrated in simulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再论分裂协方差相交:相关成分与最优性
线性融合是估计理论的基础。实现最优线性融合需要了解与所有估计量相关的误差向量的协方差。在分布式或合作系统中,交叉协方差项无法计算,为了避免低估估计误差,必须进行保守融合。保守融合提供了一个具有协方差界的融合估计量,该协方差界保证大于误差的真实协方差,但计算上难以处理。(Reinhardt et al., 2013, 2015)先前的研究证明,如果对估计量的误差不作额外的假设,则融合两个估计量的最小界由称为协方差交集(covariance intersection, CI)的融合给出。在分布式系统中,估计误差包含由测量噪声和过程噪声引起的独立项和相关项。在这种情况下,CI不再是最优方法。劈裂协方差相交(SCI)是利用不相关成分而发展起来的。本文对SCI进行了扩展,也利用了相关成分。然后,证明了新的融合为两个估计量提供了最优保守融合界,将CI的最优性推广到更广泛的融合方案类别。这个扩展的好处在模拟中得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
824
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: In the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, the IEEE Control Systems Society publishes high-quality papers on the theory, design, and applications of control engineering. Two types of contributions are regularly considered: 1) Papers: Presentation of significant research, development, or application of control concepts. 2) Technical Notes and Correspondence: Brief technical notes, comments on published areas or established control topics, corrections to papers and notes published in the Transactions. In addition, special papers (tutorials, surveys, and perspectives on the theory and applications of control systems topics) are solicited.
期刊最新文献
Safety Verification of Nonlinear Stochastic Systems via Probabilistic Tube An invariance principle-based concentration result for large-scale stochastic pairwise interaction network systems Group-Based Joint Strategy Fictitious Play with Inertia for Potential Games Cooperative Adaptive Mechanisms for Robust Distributed Control of Multi-Agent Systems Neural Network-Based Identification of State-Space Switching Nonlinear Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1