Kaidi Zhang , Yanyu Lu , Chunfeng Duan , Fangmin Zhang , Xinfeng Ling , Yun Yao , Zhuang Wang , Xintong Chen , Shaowei Yan , Yanfeng Huo , Yuan Gong
{"title":"Variations and drivers of CO2 fluxes at multiple temporal scales of subtropical agricultural systems in the Huaihe river Basin","authors":"Kaidi Zhang , Yanyu Lu , Chunfeng Duan , Fangmin Zhang , Xinfeng Ling , Yun Yao , Zhuang Wang , Xintong Chen , Shaowei Yan , Yanfeng Huo , Yuan Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding of the crop carbon balance across different time scales and corresponding responses to abiotic and biotic factors is crucial for improving carbon cycle models in the context of future climate change and management practices. In this study, we employed the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filtering method and structural equation modeling (SEM) to quantify the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes at various time scales based on 7-years measurements. Our results revealed that O<sub>3</sub> primarily manifested indirect effects on NEE and GPP via altering LAI on the daily and monthly scale, and that overall regulatory effect on CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes developed greater as the time scale increased. Net radiation (Rn) was the most critical abiotic factor altering net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and gross primary productivity (GPP) at the half-hourly, daily, and monthly scales, with the exception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) controlling daily NEE and GPP in the rice system. It was innovatively found that LAI had little control on detrended daily CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, which was much lower than the monthly CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes. Air temperature (Ta) was the most important abiotic factor for ecosystem respiration (Reco) at half-hourly and daily scale. For NEE, Reco, and GPP, the maximum explanation of SEM models was 70.10 %, 79.60 % and 76.20 %, respectively. The SEM results indicated that at multiple time scales, Rn exerted significant direct and indirect effects on both NEE and GPP. LAI only showed a strong direct leading effect on NEE and GPP on the monthly scale. The findings we reported have the potential to further develop carbon cycle models of cropland ecosystems under climate change by clarifying the influence path of O<sub>3</sub> on CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and highlighting the factors that dominate CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes on various time scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 110394"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding of the crop carbon balance across different time scales and corresponding responses to abiotic and biotic factors is crucial for improving carbon cycle models in the context of future climate change and management practices. In this study, we employed the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filtering method and structural equation modeling (SEM) to quantify the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on CO2 fluxes at various time scales based on 7-years measurements. Our results revealed that O3 primarily manifested indirect effects on NEE and GPP via altering LAI on the daily and monthly scale, and that overall regulatory effect on CO2 fluxes developed greater as the time scale increased. Net radiation (Rn) was the most critical abiotic factor altering net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and gross primary productivity (GPP) at the half-hourly, daily, and monthly scales, with the exception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) controlling daily NEE and GPP in the rice system. It was innovatively found that LAI had little control on detrended daily CO2 fluxes, which was much lower than the monthly CO2 fluxes. Air temperature (Ta) was the most important abiotic factor for ecosystem respiration (Reco) at half-hourly and daily scale. For NEE, Reco, and GPP, the maximum explanation of SEM models was 70.10 %, 79.60 % and 76.20 %, respectively. The SEM results indicated that at multiple time scales, Rn exerted significant direct and indirect effects on both NEE and GPP. LAI only showed a strong direct leading effect on NEE and GPP on the monthly scale. The findings we reported have the potential to further develop carbon cycle models of cropland ecosystems under climate change by clarifying the influence path of O3 on CO2 fluxes and highlighting the factors that dominate CO2 fluxes on various time scales.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.