Relative effects of seed mix design, consumer pressure, and edge proximity on community structure in restored prairies

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1002/eap.3083
Riley B. Pizza, Nash E. Turley, Lars A. Brudvig
{"title":"Relative effects of seed mix design, consumer pressure, and edge proximity on community structure in restored prairies","authors":"Riley B. Pizza,&nbsp;Nash E. Turley,&nbsp;Lars A. Brudvig","doi":"10.1002/eap.3083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A central goal of ecosystem restoration is to promote diverse, native-dominated plant communities. However, restoration outcomes can be highly variable. One cause of this variation may be the decisions made during the seed mix design process, such as choosing the number of species to include (sown diversity) or the number of locations each species should be sourced from (source diversity, manipulated to affect genetic diversity). The effects that seed mixes have on plant communities may be further modified by other factors at the restoration site, including edge proximity and consumer pressure. Few studies have evaluated both these seed mix attributes together, and none have done so while accounting for realistic restoration site attributes. To address this research need, we conducted a prairie restoration experiment where two aspects of seed mix design (sown diversity and source diversity) and two restoration site factors (edge proximity and vertebrate granivore/herbivore consumer access) were manipulated across 12 replicate fields. We found that when seed mix design impacted plant community structure, these effects were dependent on consumer access or edge proximity and were more prominent after one versus five growing seasons. Low seed source diversity plots had more sown species than high source diversity ones, but only when consumers had access. Similarly, low species diversity plots had higher richness and cover of species included in both the low and high species diversity mixes, but this effect weakened over time. Additionally, plots with high species diversity were buffered from the typically detrimental effects of edges and consumers, although this did not always result in greater sown species abundance. Unexpectedly, plots with the most sown species were those sown with either low source diversity or low species diversity seed mixes, perhaps due to lower seeding rates of reliably establishing species. Our results illustrate how the influences of seed mix design on restored plant communities can be highly contingent on factors like edges, consumers, and time.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.3083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.3083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A central goal of ecosystem restoration is to promote diverse, native-dominated plant communities. However, restoration outcomes can be highly variable. One cause of this variation may be the decisions made during the seed mix design process, such as choosing the number of species to include (sown diversity) or the number of locations each species should be sourced from (source diversity, manipulated to affect genetic diversity). The effects that seed mixes have on plant communities may be further modified by other factors at the restoration site, including edge proximity and consumer pressure. Few studies have evaluated both these seed mix attributes together, and none have done so while accounting for realistic restoration site attributes. To address this research need, we conducted a prairie restoration experiment where two aspects of seed mix design (sown diversity and source diversity) and two restoration site factors (edge proximity and vertebrate granivore/herbivore consumer access) were manipulated across 12 replicate fields. We found that when seed mix design impacted plant community structure, these effects were dependent on consumer access or edge proximity and were more prominent after one versus five growing seasons. Low seed source diversity plots had more sown species than high source diversity ones, but only when consumers had access. Similarly, low species diversity plots had higher richness and cover of species included in both the low and high species diversity mixes, but this effect weakened over time. Additionally, plots with high species diversity were buffered from the typically detrimental effects of edges and consumers, although this did not always result in greater sown species abundance. Unexpectedly, plots with the most sown species were those sown with either low source diversity or low species diversity seed mixes, perhaps due to lower seeding rates of reliably establishing species. Our results illustrate how the influences of seed mix design on restored plant communities can be highly contingent on factors like edges, consumers, and time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种子混合设计、消费者压力和边缘接近对恢复草原群落结构的相对影响
生态系统恢复的一个核心目标是促进多样化、以本土植物为主的植物群落。然而,恢复的结果可能是高度可变的。造成这种差异的一个原因可能是在种子混合设计过程中所做的决定,例如选择包括的物种数量(播种多样性)或每个物种应来自的地点数量(来源多样性,操纵以影响遗传多样性)。种子混合对植物群落的影响可能会被恢复地点的其他因素进一步改变,包括边缘接近和消费者压力。很少有研究同时评估这两种种子混合属性,而且没有研究在考虑实际恢复地点属性的情况下这样做。为了满足这一研究需求,我们进行了一项草原恢复实验,在12个重复场中操纵种子组合设计(播种多样性和来源多样性)和恢复场地因子(边缘接近和脊椎动物/食草动物消费者获取)的两个方面。我们发现,当种子混合设计影响植物群落结构时,这些影响依赖于消费者接近或边缘接近,并且在一个生长季节比五个生长季节更加突出。种源多样性低的样地比种源多样性高的样地有更多的播种物种,但只有在消费者有通道的情况下。同样,低物种多样性样地的物种丰富度和盖度都高于高物种多样性样地,但随着时间的推移,这种影响逐渐减弱。此外,物种多样性高的样地可以缓冲边缘和消费者的典型不利影响,尽管这并不总是导致更大的播种物种丰度。出乎意料的是,播种物种最多的地块是那些低源多样性或低物种多样性混合种子的地块,这可能是由于可靠建立物种的播种率较低。我们的研究结果表明,种子混合设计对恢复植物群落的影响可能高度取决于边缘、消费者和时间等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Replacing native grazers with livestock influences arthropods to have implications for ecosystem functions and disease Predicting the impact of targeted fence removal on connectivity in a migratory ecosystem Radio-tracking urban breeding birds: The importance of native vegetation The effectiveness of harvest for limiting wildlife disease: Insights from 20 years of chronic wasting disease in Wyoming A probabilistic approach to estimating timber harvest location
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1