Healthcare use in 12–18-year-old adolescents vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 versus unvaccinated in a national register-based Danish cohort

IF 21.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Nature Human Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1038/s41562-024-02097-y
Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Helle Wallach-Kildemoes, Line Ryberg Rasmussen, Ulrikka Nygaard, Nina Marie Birk, Henning Bundgaard, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Lau Caspar Thygesen, Susanne Dam Nielsen, Anne Vinggaard Christensen
{"title":"Healthcare use in 12–18-year-old adolescents vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 versus unvaccinated in a national register-based Danish cohort","authors":"Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Helle Wallach-Kildemoes, Line Ryberg Rasmussen, Ulrikka Nygaard, Nina Marie Birk, Henning Bundgaard, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Lau Caspar Thygesen, Susanne Dam Nielsen, Anne Vinggaard Christensen","doi":"10.1038/s41562-024-02097-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Healthcare use among adolescents after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. In a real-life register-based cohort study (trial NCT04786353), healthcare use was compared among Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated 12–18-year-olds. First-dose-vaccinated (between 1 May and 30 September 2021) adolescents were sex and age matched 1:1 with unvaccinated adolescents. Outcomes were visits to emergency rooms, hospitalization, and visits to general practitioners and specialist practitioners. The prior event rate ratio (PERR) was applied. The study finds that boys had fewer visits to general practitioners (PERR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.99) after the first vaccine. Up to 56 days after the second dose, vaccinated boys had lower rates of visits to specialist practitioners (0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99); after 57–182 days, vaccinated girls and boys had higher rates of visits to emergency rooms (1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.39; 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.31) and to general practitioners (1.17, 95% CI 1.12–1.21; 1.17, 95% CI 1.13–1.22). Furthermore, vaccinated boys had higher rates of visits to specialist practitioners (1.23, 95% CI 1.08–1.39). Estimates were close to one and do not indicate that BNT162b2 leads to a practically meaningful increase in healthcare use among vaccinated adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":19074,"journal":{"name":"Nature Human Behaviour","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02097-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare use among adolescents after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. In a real-life register-based cohort study (trial NCT04786353), healthcare use was compared among Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated 12–18-year-olds. First-dose-vaccinated (between 1 May and 30 September 2021) adolescents were sex and age matched 1:1 with unvaccinated adolescents. Outcomes were visits to emergency rooms, hospitalization, and visits to general practitioners and specialist practitioners. The prior event rate ratio (PERR) was applied. The study finds that boys had fewer visits to general practitioners (PERR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–0.99) after the first vaccine. Up to 56 days after the second dose, vaccinated boys had lower rates of visits to specialist practitioners (0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.99); after 57–182 days, vaccinated girls and boys had higher rates of visits to emergency rooms (1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.39; 1.17, 95% CI 1.07–1.31) and to general practitioners (1.17, 95% CI 1.12–1.21; 1.17, 95% CI 1.13–1.22). Furthermore, vaccinated boys had higher rates of visits to specialist practitioners (1.23, 95% CI 1.08–1.39). Estimates were close to one and do not indicate that BNT162b2 leads to a practically meaningful increase in healthcare use among vaccinated adolescents.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在丹麦国家登记队列中接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗与未接种疫苗的12 - 18岁青少年的医疗保健使用情况
接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后青少年的卫生保健使用情况尚不清楚。在一项现实生活中基于注册的队列研究(试验NCT04786353)中,比较了12 - 18岁的辉瑞- biontech BNT162b2 COVID-19疫苗接种和未接种疫苗的青少年的医疗保健使用情况。首次接种疫苗(2021年5月1日至9月30日)的青少年性别和年龄与未接种疫苗的青少年1:1匹配。结果是访问急诊室,住院,访问全科医生和专科医生。采用先验事件率比(PERR)。研究发现,在第一次接种疫苗后,男孩看全科医生的次数减少(PERR 0.93, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.89-0.99)。在第二次接种后56天,接种过疫苗的男孩看专科医生的比例较低(0.88,95% CI 0.79-0.99);57-182天后,接种疫苗的女孩和男孩的急诊室就诊率更高(1.22,95% CI 1.08-1.39;1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.31)和全科医生(1.17,95% CI 1.12-1.21;1.17, 95% ci 1.13-1.22)。此外,接种疫苗的男孩有更高的专科医生就诊率(1.23,95% CI 1.08-1.39)。估计值接近于1,并不表明BNT162b2导致接种疫苗的青少年中医疗保健使用实际有意义的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
36.80
自引率
1.00%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.
期刊最新文献
No evidence of positive causal effects of maternal and paternal age at first birth on children’s test scores at age 10 years Universally memorable voices The memorability of voices is predictable and consistent across listeners How institutions can better support international early-career researchers Skill dependencies underlie career paths and have societal implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1