Differential leaching mechanisms and ecological impact of organic acids on ion-adsorption type rare earth ores

IF 8.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Separation and Purification Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131701
Mengfei Zhao, Hualin Zhang, Hexing Han, Xiaoliang Jiang, Youming Yang, Tinggang Li
{"title":"Differential leaching mechanisms and ecological impact of organic acids on ion-adsorption type rare earth ores","authors":"Mengfei Zhao, Hualin Zhang, Hexing Han, Xiaoliang Jiang, Youming Yang, Tinggang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extraction of rare earth elements (REEs) via chemical leaching from ion-adsorption type rare earth ores has led to serious ecological and environmental risks. Organic acid leaching agents possessed advantages in environmental friendliness and differential leaching capabilities. This study investigated the leaching behaviors of REEs from ion-adsorption type rare earth ores using organic acids and focused on the differential leaching properties of light rare earth elements and heavy rare earth elements. The leaching conditions using acetic acid, malic acid, and citric acid were optimized, and the influences of organic acid on mineral properties and soil ecological functions were elaborated. The experimental results indicated that acetic acid, malic acid, and citric acid had unique REEs differential leaching properties, without significantly altering the mineral structure. The leaching efficiency of full-phase, and colloidal sediment phase REEs reached 49.75%, and 28.03% for acetic acid, 52.07%, and 26.65% for malic acid, 51.79%, and 33.07% for citric acid, respectively. Furthermore, the patterns of the soil enzyme activity also confirmed the perspective that the soil ecology had not been affected obviously by the organic acids leaching process and rapidly recovered after leaching. Subsequently, Visual Minteq simulation and Density Functional Theory calculations indicated the differential leaching mechanism of light and heavy rare earths depended on the differences in complexation effects of organic acid, and the leaching of colloidal sediment phase REEs was the result of combined effects of acid leaching and complexation competition. The work provided molecular-level insights into the colloidal sediment phase REEs leaching and differential leaching mechanisms of light and heavy rare earths by organic acids, contributing to the understanding of REEs extraction processes.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extraction of rare earth elements (REEs) via chemical leaching from ion-adsorption type rare earth ores has led to serious ecological and environmental risks. Organic acid leaching agents possessed advantages in environmental friendliness and differential leaching capabilities. This study investigated the leaching behaviors of REEs from ion-adsorption type rare earth ores using organic acids and focused on the differential leaching properties of light rare earth elements and heavy rare earth elements. The leaching conditions using acetic acid, malic acid, and citric acid were optimized, and the influences of organic acid on mineral properties and soil ecological functions were elaborated. The experimental results indicated that acetic acid, malic acid, and citric acid had unique REEs differential leaching properties, without significantly altering the mineral structure. The leaching efficiency of full-phase, and colloidal sediment phase REEs reached 49.75%, and 28.03% for acetic acid, 52.07%, and 26.65% for malic acid, 51.79%, and 33.07% for citric acid, respectively. Furthermore, the patterns of the soil enzyme activity also confirmed the perspective that the soil ecology had not been affected obviously by the organic acids leaching process and rapidly recovered after leaching. Subsequently, Visual Minteq simulation and Density Functional Theory calculations indicated the differential leaching mechanism of light and heavy rare earths depended on the differences in complexation effects of organic acid, and the leaching of colloidal sediment phase REEs was the result of combined effects of acid leaching and complexation competition. The work provided molecular-level insights into the colloidal sediment phase REEs leaching and differential leaching mechanisms of light and heavy rare earths by organic acids, contributing to the understanding of REEs extraction processes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机酸对离子吸附型稀土矿的差异浸出机制及生态影响
离子吸附型稀土矿采用化学浸出法提取稀土元素存在严重的生态环境风险。有机酸浸剂具有环境友好和差别化浸出能力的优势。研究了有机酸对离子吸附型稀土矿中稀土元素的浸出行为,重点研究了轻稀土元素和重稀土元素的差异浸出特性。优化了乙酸、苹果酸和柠檬酸的浸出条件,阐述了有机酸对土壤矿质特性和土壤生态功能的影响。实验结果表明,乙酸、苹果酸和柠檬酸具有独特的稀土元素差异浸出特性,且不显著改变矿物结构。全相、胶体沉淀物相稀土元素的浸出效率分别为49.75%、28.03%、52.07%、26.65%、51.79%、33.07%。此外,土壤酶活性的变化规律也证实了有机酸淋滤过程对土壤生态的影响不明显,淋滤后土壤生态恢复迅速的观点。随后,Visual Minteq模拟和密度泛函数理论计算表明,轻稀土和重稀土的不同浸出机制取决于有机酸络合作用的差异,胶体沉积物相稀土的浸出是酸浸和络合竞争共同作用的结果。该研究为胶体沉积物相稀土浸出和有机酸对轻、重稀土的差异浸出机制提供了分子水平的见解,有助于理解稀土的提取过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Dual-driven charge transport enabled by S-scheme heterojunction and solid solution in CdS@N-NiCoO photocatalysts for enhanced hydrogen evolution Extracting metallic lithium and separating diffusion pump oil from lithium slag using a novel negative pressure distillation technology Additive promoted supported mixed amines on mesoporous silica for cyclic capture of carbon dioxide A conical array water evaporator with anti-biofouling, salt-rejecting and anti-polyelectrolyte effect for efficient solar energy-driven seawater desalination Permanganate pretreatment Improves the production of short chain fatty acids from waste activated sludge at pH10: Performance and mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1