Ruth Eva Jørgensen, Rosa Cheesman, Ole A. Andreassen, Torkild Hovde Lyngstad
{"title":"The Genetics of Partnership Dissolution","authors":"Ruth Eva Jørgensen, Rosa Cheesman, Ole A. Andreassen, Torkild Hovde Lyngstad","doi":"10.15195/v12.a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a genetic component to divorce risk, but little is known about which and how genetically influenced traits are involved. This study makes three major contributions to address these gaps. First, we link genetic data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) to population register data and estimate the total influence of common genetic variants on partnership dissolution (N = 121, 408). Then, we identify heritable traits associated with partnership dissolution using event-history analysis and a broad set of polygenic indices. Finally, we assess whether associations are robust to controls for confounding in within-sibling models. Significant heritability estimates were found for both females (h2SNP = 0.09; SE = 0.01; p < 0.0001) and males (h2SNP = 0.03; SE = 0.01; p < 0.0001). Genetic dispositions for educational attainment and other sociodemographic factors decrease the probability of partnership dissolution, whereas dispositions for internalizing symptoms and risk behavior increase the likelihood of partnership dissolution. Integrating genetics and sociodemographic approaches can shed new light on the causes of partnership dynamics by helping us understand what drives the selection processes throughout the life course.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v12.a4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a genetic component to divorce risk, but little is known about which and how genetically influenced traits are involved. This study makes three major contributions to address these gaps. First, we link genetic data from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) to population register data and estimate the total influence of common genetic variants on partnership dissolution (N = 121, 408). Then, we identify heritable traits associated with partnership dissolution using event-history analysis and a broad set of polygenic indices. Finally, we assess whether associations are robust to controls for confounding in within-sibling models. Significant heritability estimates were found for both females (h2SNP = 0.09; SE = 0.01; p < 0.0001) and males (h2SNP = 0.03; SE = 0.01; p < 0.0001). Genetic dispositions for educational attainment and other sociodemographic factors decrease the probability of partnership dissolution, whereas dispositions for internalizing symptoms and risk behavior increase the likelihood of partnership dissolution. Integrating genetics and sociodemographic approaches can shed new light on the causes of partnership dynamics by helping us understand what drives the selection processes throughout the life course.
离婚风险与遗传因素有关,但人们对离婚风险与哪些以及如何受遗传影响的特征有关知之甚少。本研究为填补这些空白做出了三大贡献。首先,我们将挪威母亲、父亲和儿童队列研究(MoBa)的遗传数据与人口登记数据联系起来,估算出常见遗传变异对伴侣关系解除的总体影响(N = 121,408)。然后,我们利用事件历史分析和一套广泛的多基因指数来确定与伴侣关系解除相关的遗传特征。最后,我们评估了在同胞模型中控制混杂因素后,相关性是否稳健。我们发现,女性(h2SNP = 0.09; SE = 0.01; p < 0.0001)和男性(h2SNP = 0.03; SE = 0.01; p < 0.0001)的遗传率估计值都很显著。教育程度的遗传倾向和其他社会人口因素会降低伴侣关系解体的可能性,而内化症状和危险行为的遗传倾向则会增加伴侣关系解体的可能性。将遗传学和社会人口学方法结合起来,可以帮助我们了解在整个生命过程中是什么驱动了选择过程,从而对伴侣关系动态的成因有新的认识。
期刊介绍:
Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.