Model Approximation in MDPs With Unbounded Per-Step Cost

IF 7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1109/TAC.2025.3532181
Berk Bozkurt;Aditya Mahajan;Ashutosh Nayyar;Yi Ouyang
{"title":"Model Approximation in MDPs With Unbounded Per-Step Cost","authors":"Berk Bozkurt;Aditya Mahajan;Ashutosh Nayyar;Yi Ouyang","doi":"10.1109/TAC.2025.3532181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we consider the problem of designing a control policy for an infinite-horizon discounted cost Markov decision process <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {M}$</tex-math></inline-formula> when we only have access to an approximate model <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\hat{\\mathcal {M}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. How well does an optimal policy <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\hat{\\pi }^{\\star }$</tex-math></inline-formula> of the approximate model perform when used in the original model <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {M}$</tex-math></inline-formula>? We answer this question by bounding a weighted norm of the difference between the value function of <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\hat{\\pi }^\\star$</tex-math></inline-formula> when used in <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {M}$</tex-math></inline-formula> and the optimal value function of <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {M}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. We then extend our results and obtain potentially tighter upper bounds by considering affine transformations of the per-step cost. We further provide upper bounds that explicitly depend on the weighted distance between cost functions and weighted distance between transition kernels of the original and approximate models. We present examples to illustrate our results.","PeriodicalId":13201,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","volume":"70 7","pages":"4624-4639"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10848136/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we consider the problem of designing a control policy for an infinite-horizon discounted cost Markov decision process $\mathcal {M}$ when we only have access to an approximate model $\hat{\mathcal {M}}$. How well does an optimal policy $\hat{\pi }^{\star }$ of the approximate model perform when used in the original model $\mathcal {M}$? We answer this question by bounding a weighted norm of the difference between the value function of $\hat{\pi }^\star$ when used in $\mathcal {M}$ and the optimal value function of $\mathcal {M}$. We then extend our results and obtain potentially tighter upper bounds by considering affine transformations of the per-step cost. We further provide upper bounds that explicitly depend on the weighted distance between cost functions and weighted distance between transition kernels of the original and approximate models. We present examples to illustrate our results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有无界每步成本的mdp模型近似
在本文中,我们考虑当我们只有一个近似模型$\hat{\mathcal {M}}$时,为无限视界贴现成本马尔可夫决策过程$\mathcal {M}$设计控制策略的问题。当在原始模型$\mathcal {M}$中使用近似模型的最优策略$\hat{\pi }^{\star }$时,效果如何?我们通过在$\mathcal {M}$中使用$\hat{\pi }^\star$的值函数与$\mathcal {M}$的最优值函数之间的差的加权范数来回答这个问题。然后,我们扩展了我们的结果,并通过考虑每步代价的仿射变换获得了可能更严格的上界。我们进一步提供了上界,该上界明确依赖于成本函数之间的加权距离以及原始模型和近似模型的转换核之间的加权距离。我们举一些例子来说明我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
824
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: In the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, the IEEE Control Systems Society publishes high-quality papers on the theory, design, and applications of control engineering. Two types of contributions are regularly considered: 1) Papers: Presentation of significant research, development, or application of control concepts. 2) Technical Notes and Correspondence: Brief technical notes, comments on published areas or established control topics, corrections to papers and notes published in the Transactions. In addition, special papers (tutorials, surveys, and perspectives on the theory and applications of control systems topics) are solicited.
期刊最新文献
Safety-Constrained Control with Tunable Performance Using Dual-Mode Method and Local Trajectory Adjustment Communication-Efficient Stochastic Distributed Learning Benign Nonconvex Landscapes in Optimal and Robust Control, Part I: Global Optimality Benign Nonconvex Landscapes in Optimal and Robust Control, Part II: Extended Convex Lifting Least-squares model-reference adaptive control: extension to higher relative degree plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1