Co-location of seaweed farming with offshore wind energy: a quick scoping review

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Frontiers in Marine Science Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.3389/fmars.2024.1471204
Brianna Coffey, Cortni Borgerson, Pankaj Lal, Colette J. Feehan
{"title":"Co-location of seaweed farming with offshore wind energy: a quick scoping review","authors":"Brianna Coffey, Cortni Borgerson, Pankaj Lal, Colette J. Feehan","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2024.1471204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seaweed farming is increasingly recognized as a sustainable marine resource management opportunity, but it also poses socioeconomic and environmental risks that require careful evaluation. This quick scoping review (QSR) examines the current state of knowledge on upscaling seaweed farming through co-location with offshore wind energy production. A total of 240 published records from 2001 to 2022 were analyzed, including studies on general seaweed farming and its integration with offshore wind energy, both of which have shown a significant increase in annual publication rates over time. Geographically, the majority of studies on general seaweed farming were conducted in Asia, while most research on wind-focused integration was carried out in Europe. Differences in cultivated species were evident, with red seaweeds dominating the general literature and brown seaweeds dominating wind-focused studies. Ecosystem service analysis revealed that provisioning services were disproportionately emphasized, while cultural services were underrepresented in wind-focused studies as compared to the general literature. Environmental constraints were the most frequently cited challenges across both datasets, but their nature differed: general literature highlighted issues such as pests, diseases, and epiphytes that reduce farm yield, while wind-focused studies emphasized risks of farms to local species, habitats, and ecosystems. While environmental knowledge gaps were the most frequently cited overall, legal knowledge gaps were predominant in wind-focused studies. These findings underscore the need for more geographically and taxonomically diverse studies on seaweed-wind multi-use, along with further investigation into cultural services in offshore contexts, strategies for mitigating environmental risks, and the development of frameworks for shared governance to advance sustainable ocean development.","PeriodicalId":12479,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Marine Science","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1471204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seaweed farming is increasingly recognized as a sustainable marine resource management opportunity, but it also poses socioeconomic and environmental risks that require careful evaluation. This quick scoping review (QSR) examines the current state of knowledge on upscaling seaweed farming through co-location with offshore wind energy production. A total of 240 published records from 2001 to 2022 were analyzed, including studies on general seaweed farming and its integration with offshore wind energy, both of which have shown a significant increase in annual publication rates over time. Geographically, the majority of studies on general seaweed farming were conducted in Asia, while most research on wind-focused integration was carried out in Europe. Differences in cultivated species were evident, with red seaweeds dominating the general literature and brown seaweeds dominating wind-focused studies. Ecosystem service analysis revealed that provisioning services were disproportionately emphasized, while cultural services were underrepresented in wind-focused studies as compared to the general literature. Environmental constraints were the most frequently cited challenges across both datasets, but their nature differed: general literature highlighted issues such as pests, diseases, and epiphytes that reduce farm yield, while wind-focused studies emphasized risks of farms to local species, habitats, and ecosystems. While environmental knowledge gaps were the most frequently cited overall, legal knowledge gaps were predominant in wind-focused studies. These findings underscore the need for more geographically and taxonomically diverse studies on seaweed-wind multi-use, along with further investigation into cultural services in offshore contexts, strategies for mitigating environmental risks, and the development of frameworks for shared governance to advance sustainable ocean development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海藻养殖与海上风能的共同定位:快速范围审查
人们越来越认识到海藻养殖是可持续的海洋资源管理机会,但它也带来了社会经济和环境风险,需要仔细评估。本快速范围审查(QSR)审查了通过与海上风能生产共同定位来扩大海藻养殖的知识现状。从2001年到2022年,共分析了240份已发表的记录,包括关于一般海藻养殖及其与海上风能结合的研究,这两项研究都显示出随着时间的推移,年发表率显著增加。从地理上看,大多数关于一般海藻养殖的研究是在亚洲进行的,而大多数关于以风能为重点的一体化的研究是在欧洲进行的。栽培物种的差异是明显的,红色海藻在一般文献中占主导地位,棕色海藻在风力研究中占主导地位。生态系统服务分析显示,与一般文献相比,供应服务被不成比例地强调,而文化服务在以风为重点的研究中代表性不足。在这两个数据集中,环境约束是最常被提及的挑战,但它们的性质不同:一般文献强调的是减少农业产量的害虫、疾病和附生植物等问题,而以风能为重点的研究强调的是农场对当地物种、栖息地和生态系统的风险。虽然环境知识差距是最常被引用的,但法律知识差距在以风能为重点的研究中占主导地位。这些发现强调,需要对海藻和海风的多用途进行更多地理和分类上的多样化研究,同时进一步调查近海环境中的文化服务、减轻环境风险的战略,以及制定共同治理框架,以促进海洋的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Marine Science
Frontiers in Marine Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
2443
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Marine Science publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of all aspects of the environment, biology, ecosystem functioning and human interactions with the oceans. Field Chief Editor Carlos M. Duarte at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, policy makers and the public worldwide. With the human population predicted to reach 9 billion people by 2050, it is clear that traditional land resources will not suffice to meet the demand for food or energy, required to support high-quality livelihoods. As a result, the oceans are emerging as a source of untapped assets, with new innovative industries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, marine energy and deep-sea mining growing rapidly under a new era characterized by rapid growth of a blue, ocean-based economy. The sustainability of the blue economy is closely dependent on our knowledge about how to mitigate the impacts of the multiple pressures on the ocean ecosystem associated with the increased scale and diversification of industry operations in the ocean and global human pressures on the environment. Therefore, Frontiers in Marine Science particularly welcomes the communication of research outcomes addressing ocean-based solutions for the emerging challenges, including improved forecasting and observational capacities, understanding biodiversity and ecosystem problems, locally and globally, effective management strategies to maintain ocean health, and an improved capacity to sustainably derive resources from the oceans.
期刊最新文献
Effect of delayed sea ice retreat on zooplankton communities in the Pacific Arctic Ocean: a generalized dissimilarity modeling approach Estimates of disclosure and victimization rates for fishery observers in the maritime workplace The size-fractionated composition of particulate biogenic silica and its ecological significance in the Changjiang Estuary area Location and natural history are key to determining impact of the 2021 atmospheric heatwave on Pacific Northwest rocky intertidal communities Two new species of Plagiostomum (Prolecithophora, Plagiostomidae) from China with its morphology, phylogeny, and reproductive strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1