Brianna Coffey, Cortni Borgerson, Pankaj Lal, Colette J. Feehan
{"title":"Co-location of seaweed farming with offshore wind energy: a quick scoping review","authors":"Brianna Coffey, Cortni Borgerson, Pankaj Lal, Colette J. Feehan","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2024.1471204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seaweed farming is increasingly recognized as a sustainable marine resource management opportunity, but it also poses socioeconomic and environmental risks that require careful evaluation. This quick scoping review (QSR) examines the current state of knowledge on upscaling seaweed farming through co-location with offshore wind energy production. A total of 240 published records from 2001 to 2022 were analyzed, including studies on general seaweed farming and its integration with offshore wind energy, both of which have shown a significant increase in annual publication rates over time. Geographically, the majority of studies on general seaweed farming were conducted in Asia, while most research on wind-focused integration was carried out in Europe. Differences in cultivated species were evident, with red seaweeds dominating the general literature and brown seaweeds dominating wind-focused studies. Ecosystem service analysis revealed that provisioning services were disproportionately emphasized, while cultural services were underrepresented in wind-focused studies as compared to the general literature. Environmental constraints were the most frequently cited challenges across both datasets, but their nature differed: general literature highlighted issues such as pests, diseases, and epiphytes that reduce farm yield, while wind-focused studies emphasized risks of farms to local species, habitats, and ecosystems. While environmental knowledge gaps were the most frequently cited overall, legal knowledge gaps were predominant in wind-focused studies. These findings underscore the need for more geographically and taxonomically diverse studies on seaweed-wind multi-use, along with further investigation into cultural services in offshore contexts, strategies for mitigating environmental risks, and the development of frameworks for shared governance to advance sustainable ocean development.","PeriodicalId":12479,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Marine Science","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1471204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seaweed farming is increasingly recognized as a sustainable marine resource management opportunity, but it also poses socioeconomic and environmental risks that require careful evaluation. This quick scoping review (QSR) examines the current state of knowledge on upscaling seaweed farming through co-location with offshore wind energy production. A total of 240 published records from 2001 to 2022 were analyzed, including studies on general seaweed farming and its integration with offshore wind energy, both of which have shown a significant increase in annual publication rates over time. Geographically, the majority of studies on general seaweed farming were conducted in Asia, while most research on wind-focused integration was carried out in Europe. Differences in cultivated species were evident, with red seaweeds dominating the general literature and brown seaweeds dominating wind-focused studies. Ecosystem service analysis revealed that provisioning services were disproportionately emphasized, while cultural services were underrepresented in wind-focused studies as compared to the general literature. Environmental constraints were the most frequently cited challenges across both datasets, but their nature differed: general literature highlighted issues such as pests, diseases, and epiphytes that reduce farm yield, while wind-focused studies emphasized risks of farms to local species, habitats, and ecosystems. While environmental knowledge gaps were the most frequently cited overall, legal knowledge gaps were predominant in wind-focused studies. These findings underscore the need for more geographically and taxonomically diverse studies on seaweed-wind multi-use, along with further investigation into cultural services in offshore contexts, strategies for mitigating environmental risks, and the development of frameworks for shared governance to advance sustainable ocean development.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Marine Science publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of all aspects of the environment, biology, ecosystem functioning and human interactions with the oceans. Field Chief Editor Carlos M. Duarte at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, policy makers and the public worldwide.
With the human population predicted to reach 9 billion people by 2050, it is clear that traditional land resources will not suffice to meet the demand for food or energy, required to support high-quality livelihoods. As a result, the oceans are emerging as a source of untapped assets, with new innovative industries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, marine energy and deep-sea mining growing rapidly under a new era characterized by rapid growth of a blue, ocean-based economy. The sustainability of the blue economy is closely dependent on our knowledge about how to mitigate the impacts of the multiple pressures on the ocean ecosystem associated with the increased scale and diversification of industry operations in the ocean and global human pressures on the environment. Therefore, Frontiers in Marine Science particularly welcomes the communication of research outcomes addressing ocean-based solutions for the emerging challenges, including improved forecasting and observational capacities, understanding biodiversity and ecosystem problems, locally and globally, effective management strategies to maintain ocean health, and an improved capacity to sustainably derive resources from the oceans.