Feasibility of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy Compared to Open Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Large Single-Center Cohort Study.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000006633
Sang-Hoon Kim,Ki-Hun Kim,Young-In Yoon,Woo-Hyoung Kang,Sang-Kyung Lee,Shin Hwang,Chul-Soo Ahn,Deok-Bog Moon,Tae-Yong Ha,Gi-Won Song,Dong-Hwan Jung,Gil-Chun Park,Ji Hoon Kim,Eun-Kyoung Jwa,Byeong-Gon Na,Sung Min Kim,Rak-Kyun Oh,I-Ji Jeong,Hyo Jung Ko,Minha Choi,Dae Hyeon Won,Ji Hoon Kang,Sung-Gyu Lee
{"title":"Feasibility of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy Compared to Open Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Large Single-Center Cohort Study.","authors":"Sang-Hoon Kim,Ki-Hun Kim,Young-In Yoon,Woo-Hyoung Kang,Sang-Kyung Lee,Shin Hwang,Chul-Soo Ahn,Deok-Bog Moon,Tae-Yong Ha,Gi-Won Song,Dong-Hwan Jung,Gil-Chun Park,Ji Hoon Kim,Eun-Kyoung Jwa,Byeong-Gon Na,Sung Min Kim,Rak-Kyun Oh,I-Ji Jeong,Hyo Jung Ko,Minha Choi,Dae Hyeon Won,Ji Hoon Kang,Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to compare morbidity of living donors and recipients after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH).\r\n\r\nBACKGROUND\r\nDonor and recipient morbidity have not been sufficiently reported in large-scale comparisons of PLDRH and ODRH.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective study reviewed 3348 donors who underwent PLDRH (n=329) and ODRH (n=3019) and their corresponding recipients (n=3348) between January 2014 and August 2023. Donor complications and recipient biliary complications within 90 days were evaluated before and after 1:3 propensity score mathcing (PSM). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified significant risk factors for donor major and biliary complications, as well as recipient bile leakage and biliary stricture.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFor donors, PLDRH had fewer overall complications than ODRH (0.9% vs. 3.7%, P=0.009), with no significant differences in major (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) complications (P=0.057) and biliary complications (P=0.067), despite the absence of biliary complications in PLDRH. However, PLDRH showed longer warm ischemic time and operation time, and higher peak aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels compared to ODRH in donors (P<0.001). These results remained consistent after PSM. Recipient biliary complications were comparable between PLDRH and ODRH, both before (P=0.806) and after PSM (P=0.149). Multiple portal veins were significant donor risk foctor for major (P=0.022), and biliary complications (P=0.001). Separated multiple bile ducts were common significant recipient risk factor for bile leakage (P=0.007) and biliary stricture (P=0.022).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPLDRH could become the standard for donor right hepatectomy with careful consideration of portal and biliary variations for donor and recipient safety.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006633","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare morbidity of living donors and recipients after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH). BACKGROUND Donor and recipient morbidity have not been sufficiently reported in large-scale comparisons of PLDRH and ODRH. METHODS This retrospective study reviewed 3348 donors who underwent PLDRH (n=329) and ODRH (n=3019) and their corresponding recipients (n=3348) between January 2014 and August 2023. Donor complications and recipient biliary complications within 90 days were evaluated before and after 1:3 propensity score mathcing (PSM). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified significant risk factors for donor major and biliary complications, as well as recipient bile leakage and biliary stricture. RESULTS For donors, PLDRH had fewer overall complications than ODRH (0.9% vs. 3.7%, P=0.009), with no significant differences in major (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) complications (P=0.057) and biliary complications (P=0.067), despite the absence of biliary complications in PLDRH. However, PLDRH showed longer warm ischemic time and operation time, and higher peak aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels compared to ODRH in donors (P<0.001). These results remained consistent after PSM. Recipient biliary complications were comparable between PLDRH and ODRH, both before (P=0.806) and after PSM (P=0.149). Multiple portal veins were significant donor risk foctor for major (P=0.022), and biliary complications (P=0.001). Separated multiple bile ducts were common significant recipient risk factor for bile leakage (P=0.007) and biliary stricture (P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS PLDRH could become the standard for donor right hepatectomy with careful consideration of portal and biliary variations for donor and recipient safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与开放式右肝切除术相比,纯腹腔镜供肝切除术的可行性:一项大型单中心队列研究。
目的比较纯腹腔镜右肝切除术(PLDRH)和开放式右肝切除术(ODRH)后活体供体和受体的发病率。在PLDRH和ODRH的大规模比较中,供体和受体发病率尚未得到充分的报道。方法回顾性研究回顾了2014年1月至2023年8月期间接受PLDRH (n=329)和ODRH (n=3019)的3348例供体及其相应的受体(n=3348)。1:3倾向性评分计算(PSM)前后评价90天内供体并发症和受体胆道并发症。多因素logistic回归分析确定了供体大动脉和胆道并发症以及受体胆漏和胆道狭窄的显著危险因素。结果对于献血者而言,PLDRH的总并发症少于ODRH (0.9% vs. 3.7%, P=0.009),尽管PLDRH无胆道并发症,但在主要(Clavien-Dindo III/IV)并发症(P=0.057)和胆道并发症(P=0.067)方面差异无统计学意义。但与ODRH组相比,PLDRH组热缺血时间和手术时间更长,谷草转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶峰值水平更高(P<0.001)。这些结果在PSM后保持一致。受体胆道并发症在PSM前(P=0.806)和PSM后(P=0.149), PLDRH和ODRH之间具有可比性。多发门静脉是主要(P=0.022)和胆道并发症的重要供体危险因素(P=0.001)。分离的多道胆管是胆漏(P=0.007)和胆道狭窄(P=0.022)常见的重要受体危险因素。结论spldrh可作为供肝切除的标准,同时考虑门脉和胆道的变化,以保证供受体的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
Defer, Share, or Drive the Decision: Empowering Patients with Varied Preferences to Engage in Decision-making (an Analysis from Alliance A231701CD). International Medical Graduates in Academic Cardiothoracic Surgery. Validation of the PANAMA-Score for Survival and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Prevalence and Incidence of Oral Benzodiazepine Use in Hospitalized Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Future of Robotic Surgery and the Path Forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1