Special Educators’ Experiences Navigating Tensions When Serving Students Labeled With Emotional/Behavioral Disorders

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Remedial and Special Education Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1177/07419325241310512
Elizabeth Bettini, Kathryn M. Meyer, Margaret O’Brien, Margaret Carroll, Hannah Morris Mathews
{"title":"Special Educators’ Experiences Navigating Tensions When Serving Students Labeled With Emotional/Behavioral Disorders","authors":"Elizabeth Bettini, Kathryn M. Meyer, Margaret O’Brien, Margaret Carroll, Hannah Morris Mathews","doi":"10.1177/07419325241310512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Special educators often work in school contexts that are not oriented toward their students’ strengths and needs, resulting in tension–misalignment between their responsibility to students and their schools’ resources and expectations. Using grounded theory, we explored five teachers’ experiences of tension when serving students labeled with emotional/behavioral disorders in self-contained classes. We found teachers experienced tensions regarding students’ belonging, their academic instructional roles, and their roles supporting students’ behavior. Tensions reflected ways schools were not oriented toward students’ strengths and support needs. Yet, teachers’ perspectives on tensions varied greatly. Grounded in humanizing perspectives on students, some teachers experienced tension with colleagues who resisted including students and honoring students’ support needs. Other teachers held deficit-based, legalistic views of students, which underlay their acceptance of (or even advocacy for) exclusion. Findings indicate the centrality of educators’ conceptions of disability for how they conceptualize and fulfill their roles in serving students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":48042,"journal":{"name":"Remedial and Special Education","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedial and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325241310512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Special educators often work in school contexts that are not oriented toward their students’ strengths and needs, resulting in tension–misalignment between their responsibility to students and their schools’ resources and expectations. Using grounded theory, we explored five teachers’ experiences of tension when serving students labeled with emotional/behavioral disorders in self-contained classes. We found teachers experienced tensions regarding students’ belonging, their academic instructional roles, and their roles supporting students’ behavior. Tensions reflected ways schools were not oriented toward students’ strengths and support needs. Yet, teachers’ perspectives on tensions varied greatly. Grounded in humanizing perspectives on students, some teachers experienced tension with colleagues who resisted including students and honoring students’ support needs. Other teachers held deficit-based, legalistic views of students, which underlay their acceptance of (or even advocacy for) exclusion. Findings indicate the centrality of educators’ conceptions of disability for how they conceptualize and fulfill their roles in serving students with disabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊教育者在为有情绪/行为障碍的学生服务时处理紧张关系的经验
特殊教育工作者经常在不以学生的优势和需求为导向的学校环境中工作,导致他们对学生的责任与学校的资源和期望之间的紧张错位。运用扎根理论,我们探讨了五位教师在独立课堂上为有情绪/行为障碍的学生服务时的紧张体验。我们发现教师在学生的归属感、他们的学术指导角色和他们支持学生行为的角色方面经历了紧张。紧张反映了学校没有以学生的优势和支持需求为导向。然而,教师对紧张局势的看法差异很大。基于对学生的人性化视角,一些教师与拒绝接纳学生、尊重学生支持需求的同事关系紧张。其他教师则以赤字为基础,对学生持法律主义的观点,这是他们接受(甚至主张)排斥的基础。研究结果表明,教育工作者的残疾概念对他们如何概念化和履行他们为残疾学生服务的角色起着中心作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Remedial and Special Education
Remedial and Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Remedial and Special Education (RASE) is devoted to the discussion of issues involving the education of persons for whom typical instruction is not effective. Emphasis is on the interpretation of research literature and recommendations for the practice of remedial and special education. Appropriate topics include, but are not limited to, definition, identification, assessment, characteristics, management, and instruction of underachieving and exceptional children, youth, and adults; related services; family involvement; service delivery systems; legislation; litigation; and professional standards and training.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Instructional Design in the Delivery of Early Science Instruction Using Asynchronous Training and Emailed Performance Feedback to Change a Teaching Behavior of Preservice Teachers Comparing Computer-Based Single-Phrase and Multiphrase Interventions on Generalized Reading in Postsecondary Students With Disability The Efficacy of a Content Area Reading Comprehension Intervention for Students With Disabilities Using Point-of-View Video Self-Prompting to Teach Algebra to Secondary Students With High-Incidence Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1