{"title":"Dear sceptics of patient engagement in research","authors":"Dawn P Richards","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dawn P Richards challenges some of the common objections to patient engagement in research I have been in a lot of spaces over the years where people were not convinced about patient engagement in research. They often feel that they already have enough to do, or that this is “yet another” hoop that funding agencies are requiring them to jump through. I am writing this for you. I am not entirely sure that I will change your mind, but hopefully I can get you to think about some of your objections and why patient engagement in research is generally a good thing. ### Patients are vulnerable in most systems Firstly, I would ask you to consider that patients are pretty much at the bottom of the pecking order in most situations or settings. In healthcare, they are beholden to healthcare providers and are obliged to behave like a “good patient.”` A good patient asks questions gently or strategically (or not at all!), avoids being too “difficult,” and does not challenge the professionals. Never mind that patients live 24/7 with their chronic condition or the health consequences of an acute illness, and that they manage as best …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dawn P Richards challenges some of the common objections to patient engagement in research I have been in a lot of spaces over the years where people were not convinced about patient engagement in research. They often feel that they already have enough to do, or that this is “yet another” hoop that funding agencies are requiring them to jump through. I am writing this for you. I am not entirely sure that I will change your mind, but hopefully I can get you to think about some of your objections and why patient engagement in research is generally a good thing. ### Patients are vulnerable in most systems Firstly, I would ask you to consider that patients are pretty much at the bottom of the pecking order in most situations or settings. In healthcare, they are beholden to healthcare providers and are obliged to behave like a “good patient.”` A good patient asks questions gently or strategically (or not at all!), avoids being too “difficult,” and does not challenge the professionals. Never mind that patients live 24/7 with their chronic condition or the health consequences of an acute illness, and that they manage as best …
Dawn P Richards挑战了一些常见的反对病人参与研究的观点,这些年来我在很多地方都遇到过人们不相信病人参与研究的情况。他们经常觉得他们已经有足够的事情要做,或者这是资助机构要求他们跨越的“又一个”障碍。我为你写这封信。我不确定我是否会改变你的想法,但希望我能让你思考你的一些反对意见,以及为什么患者参与研究通常是一件好事。首先,我想让你考虑到,在大多数情况下,病人都是处于社会底层的。在医疗保健领域,他们对医疗服务提供者负有义务,有义务表现得像个“好病人”。“一个好的病人会温和地或有策略地问问题(或者根本不问!),避免太‘难’,也不会挑战专业人士。”不要介意病人24小时不间断地与他们的慢性疾病或急性疾病的健康后果生活在一起,他们最好地管理……