Algorithmic Management in Organizations? From Edge Case to Center Stage

Anne Keegan, Jeroen Meijerink
{"title":"Algorithmic Management in Organizations? From Edge Case to Center Stage","authors":"Anne Keegan, Jeroen Meijerink","doi":"10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-070928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a comprehensive review of the literature on algorithmic management (AM), focusing on insights from human resource management (HRM), organizational psychology (OP), and organizational behavior (OB). It examines how AM is conceptualized in the contexts of platform work and the gig economy, revealing unique challenges and implications. AM functions as a holistic system, primarily in online labor platforms, where it creates a gray zone in which workers exist in an ambiguous space, neither fully inside nor outside organizational boundaries. This gray zone strategically blurs the lines between employees and freelancers, allowing platforms to circumvent traditional employment regulations. As a result, AM poses a unique challenge for HRM, OP, and OB scholars, whose frameworks typically rely on clear distinctions between employment and freelancing, often overlooking the complexities of this gray zone. The article identifies key themes emerging from the literature, highlighting the impact of AM on both individuals and organizations. It reviews AM in HRM systems, highlighting the interlocking nature, dispersion to new actors, and strategic misalignment of AM-based HRM activities. Its review of AM and careers surfaces the role of algorithmic bosses, multi-actor signaling, and identity challenges that arise from the gray zone. In conclusion, the article summarizes its findings and proposes an agenda for future research. It calls on HRM, OP, and OB scholars to engage with the expanding gray zone of work and careers shaped by platform-based ecosystems and AM, urging them to reconsider traditional boundaries and develop more nuanced approaches to understanding work in this evolving landscape.","PeriodicalId":48019,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-070928","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article offers a comprehensive review of the literature on algorithmic management (AM), focusing on insights from human resource management (HRM), organizational psychology (OP), and organizational behavior (OB). It examines how AM is conceptualized in the contexts of platform work and the gig economy, revealing unique challenges and implications. AM functions as a holistic system, primarily in online labor platforms, where it creates a gray zone in which workers exist in an ambiguous space, neither fully inside nor outside organizational boundaries. This gray zone strategically blurs the lines between employees and freelancers, allowing platforms to circumvent traditional employment regulations. As a result, AM poses a unique challenge for HRM, OP, and OB scholars, whose frameworks typically rely on clear distinctions between employment and freelancing, often overlooking the complexities of this gray zone. The article identifies key themes emerging from the literature, highlighting the impact of AM on both individuals and organizations. It reviews AM in HRM systems, highlighting the interlocking nature, dispersion to new actors, and strategic misalignment of AM-based HRM activities. Its review of AM and careers surfaces the role of algorithmic bosses, multi-actor signaling, and identity challenges that arise from the gray zone. In conclusion, the article summarizes its findings and proposes an agenda for future research. It calls on HRM, OP, and OB scholars to engage with the expanding gray zone of work and careers shaped by platform-based ecosystems and AM, urging them to reconsider traditional boundaries and develop more nuanced approaches to understanding work in this evolving landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织中的算法管理?从边缘案例到中心舞台
本文对算法管理(AM)的文献进行了全面的回顾,重点介绍了人力资源管理(HRM)、组织心理学(OP)和组织行为学(OB)的见解。它研究了AM在平台工作和零工经济背景下是如何概念化的,揭示了独特的挑战和影响。AM作为一个整体系统发挥作用,主要是在在线劳动力平台上,它创造了一个灰色地带,在这个灰色地带,工人存在于一个模糊的空间中,既不完全在组织边界之内,也不完全在组织边界之外。这个灰色地带在战略上模糊了员工和自由职业者之间的界限,允许平台规避传统的雇佣法规。因此,AM对人力资源管理、OP和OB学者提出了独特的挑战,他们的框架通常依赖于雇佣和自由职业之间的明确区别,往往忽视了这个灰色地带的复杂性。本文确定了从文献中出现的关键主题,强调了AM对个人和组织的影响。它回顾了人力资源管理系统中的AM,强调了联锁性质,分散到新的参与者,以及基于AM的人力资源管理活动的战略错位。它对AM和职业的回顾揭示了算法老板的作用、多参与者信号以及灰色地带产生的身份挑战。最后,本文对研究结果进行了总结,并提出了未来的研究方向。它呼吁人力资源管理、运营和运营管理学者参与到由基于平台的生态系统和人工智能塑造的不断扩大的工作和职业灰色地带,敦促他们重新考虑传统的界限,并制定更细致入微的方法来理解这一不断变化的环境中的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Launched in March 2014, the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior is a publication dedicated to reviewing the literature on I/O Psychology and HRM/OB. In the latest edition of the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in 2023, this journal achieved significant recognition. It ranked among the top 5 journals in two categories and boasted an impressive Impact Factor of 13.7.
期刊最新文献
Intensive Longitudinal Models Algorithmic Management in Organizations? From Edge Case to Center Stage On the Evolution of Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research Moral Decision-Making in Organizations How Effective Are Work-Life Balance Policies? The Importance of Inclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1