Evaluation of the seismic capacity of cultural heritage in case of aggregate buildings: the Castle of Rosignano Marittimo

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1007/s10518-024-02031-7
Mario Lucio Puppio, Matteo Ariu, Mariangela Deligia, Fabio Doveri, Martina Ferrini, Mauro Sassu
{"title":"Evaluation of the seismic capacity of cultural heritage in case of aggregate buildings: the Castle of Rosignano Marittimo","authors":"Mario Lucio Puppio,&nbsp;Matteo Ariu,&nbsp;Mariangela Deligia,&nbsp;Fabio Doveri,&nbsp;Martina Ferrini,&nbsp;Mauro Sassu","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02031-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The partitioning of masonry buildings in Structural Units (SUs), or aggregate of Structural Units, is a useful tool to simplify the analysis of the buildings and the study of static and seismic vulnerability. However, this allocation is affected by uncertainties, simplification, and sometimes unavoidable miscalculation due to the directionality of this subdivision. This procedure exposes the results to discrepancies due to the way the building is divided. The <i>Castle of Rosignano</i> is emblematic. In this paper, the dependence of the results on how the Structural Units are considered is analyzed, as well as the role of structural in plan and elevation irregularities on various SUs and their combination. Non-linear static analysis corresponding to different distributions of the building in Structural Units, the uncertainties about material properties, and different directions of the seismic action are analyzed, and the respective results are discussed here. A simplified approach, for the study of aggregate buildings on an urban scale, is based on the so-called “tabular method”. Several Authors proposed and improved similar methods applied to different urban contexts. A comparison of simplified methodologies with the results of the detailed FEM analysis is also discussed and presented here. Finally, a simplified approach is proposed based on the regularity parameter of the building in aggregate. Taking the evidence from FEM analysis as a physical-mechanical base, the authors propose the quantitative definition of irregularity parameters and the use of them to determine the building vulnerabilities. The proposed procedure aimed to be a practical tool to determine, in an expeditious manner, the seismic capacity of a masonry building in aggregate. The model proposed in this paper, applied to the case of the study of <i>Rosignano Marittimo</i> (a typical situation of aggregate building in a historical context in Tuscany, Italy) shows emblematic results that can be extended to analogous configuration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"553 - 578"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-02031-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02031-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The partitioning of masonry buildings in Structural Units (SUs), or aggregate of Structural Units, is a useful tool to simplify the analysis of the buildings and the study of static and seismic vulnerability. However, this allocation is affected by uncertainties, simplification, and sometimes unavoidable miscalculation due to the directionality of this subdivision. This procedure exposes the results to discrepancies due to the way the building is divided. The Castle of Rosignano is emblematic. In this paper, the dependence of the results on how the Structural Units are considered is analyzed, as well as the role of structural in plan and elevation irregularities on various SUs and their combination. Non-linear static analysis corresponding to different distributions of the building in Structural Units, the uncertainties about material properties, and different directions of the seismic action are analyzed, and the respective results are discussed here. A simplified approach, for the study of aggregate buildings on an urban scale, is based on the so-called “tabular method”. Several Authors proposed and improved similar methods applied to different urban contexts. A comparison of simplified methodologies with the results of the detailed FEM analysis is also discussed and presented here. Finally, a simplified approach is proposed based on the regularity parameter of the building in aggregate. Taking the evidence from FEM analysis as a physical-mechanical base, the authors propose the quantitative definition of irregularity parameters and the use of them to determine the building vulnerabilities. The proposed procedure aimed to be a practical tool to determine, in an expeditious manner, the seismic capacity of a masonry building in aggregate. The model proposed in this paper, applied to the case of the study of Rosignano Marittimo (a typical situation of aggregate building in a historical context in Tuscany, Italy) shows emblematic results that can be extended to analogous configuration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合建筑对文化遗产抗震能力的评估:罗西尼亚诺·马里蒂莫城堡
将砌体建筑划分为结构单元(SUs)或结构单元集合体,是简化建筑物分析和研究静力和地震易损性的有效工具。然而,由于细分的方向性,这种分配受到不确定性、简化和有时不可避免的误判的影响。由于建筑的划分方式不同,这个程序会使结果出现差异。罗西尼亚诺城堡就是一个象征。本文分析了结果对结构单元考虑方式的依赖关系,以及结构在平面和立面上的不规则性对各种单元及其组合的作用。针对结构单元中不同的建筑分布、材料性能的不确定性以及地震作用的不同方向,分析了相应的非线性静力分析,并对各自的结果进行了讨论。对于城市规模的集合体建筑的研究,一种简化的方法是基于所谓的“表格法”。几位作者提出并改进了适用于不同城市背景的类似方法。本文还讨论了简化方法与详细有限元分析结果的比较。最后,提出了一种基于建筑集料规则参数的简化方法。在有限元分析的基础上,提出了不规则性参数的定量化定义及其在确定建筑物易损性中的应用。提出的程序旨在成为一种实用的工具,以快速的方式确定砌体建筑的抗震能力。本文提出的模型应用于Rosignano Marittimo(意大利托斯卡纳历史背景下典型的集合体建筑)的案例研究,显示出具有象征意义的结果,可以扩展到类似的配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the seismic performance of corroded RC frames with masonry infills Evaluation of the seismic capacity of cultural heritage in case of aggregate buildings: the Castle of Rosignano Marittimo Accelerating uncertainty quantification in incremental dynamic analysis using dimension reduction-based surrogate modeling An improved notion for the computation of strain ratio in equivalent linear site response A moment resistant beam end connection using energy dissipative couplers for precast concrete structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1