Fingerprint resemblance amongst siblings and non-siblings — Forensic and anthropological implications

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES The Science of Nature Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s00114-025-01961-9
Akansha Rana, Damini Siwan, Rakesh Meena, Ritika Verma, Kewal Krishan
{"title":"Fingerprint resemblance amongst siblings and non-siblings — Forensic and anthropological implications","authors":"Akansha Rana,&nbsp;Damini Siwan,&nbsp;Rakesh Meena,&nbsp;Ritika Verma,&nbsp;Kewal Krishan","doi":"10.1007/s00114-025-01961-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fingerprints hold a crucial position in forensic science, primarily for identification purposes, with thumbprints emerging as the most frequently recovered evidence at crime scenes. The main purpose of the present study was to conduct a comparative analysis of thumbprints of siblings and non-sibling pairs to investigate resemblance and similarities in fingerprint patterns. Thumbprints of 144 individuals (72 siblings and 72 non-siblings) from 36 families were obtained. Jaccard Similarity Index was employed to analyse the similarity between the fingerprint patterns of siblings and non-siblings. The strength of association between the variables is evaluated by chi-square and Cramer’s V tests. The results indicated a significant similarity (69.44%) in thumbprint patterns among sibling pairs, demonstrating congruence in their right thumbprints, while non-sibling pairs exhibited a mere 30.56% similarity in the right thumbprints. Statistical analyses revealed a significant association (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) between sibling pairs, indicating a strong correlation in right-hand thumbprint patterns. The study bears substantial implications across various fields, including anthropology, population genetics, medical genetics and forensic science. Moreover, it may facilitate the examination of population similarities and variations and may aid in enhancing forensic investigations by identifying familial resemblance and similarity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":794,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Nature","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-025-01961-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fingerprints hold a crucial position in forensic science, primarily for identification purposes, with thumbprints emerging as the most frequently recovered evidence at crime scenes. The main purpose of the present study was to conduct a comparative analysis of thumbprints of siblings and non-sibling pairs to investigate resemblance and similarities in fingerprint patterns. Thumbprints of 144 individuals (72 siblings and 72 non-siblings) from 36 families were obtained. Jaccard Similarity Index was employed to analyse the similarity between the fingerprint patterns of siblings and non-siblings. The strength of association between the variables is evaluated by chi-square and Cramer’s V tests. The results indicated a significant similarity (69.44%) in thumbprint patterns among sibling pairs, demonstrating congruence in their right thumbprints, while non-sibling pairs exhibited a mere 30.56% similarity in the right thumbprints. Statistical analyses revealed a significant association (p = 0.0002) between sibling pairs, indicating a strong correlation in right-hand thumbprint patterns. The study bears substantial implications across various fields, including anthropology, population genetics, medical genetics and forensic science. Moreover, it may facilitate the examination of population similarities and variations and may aid in enhancing forensic investigations by identifying familial resemblance and similarity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
兄弟姐妹和非兄弟姐妹之间的指纹相似性-法医和人类学含义
指纹在法医学中占有至关重要的地位,主要用于身份鉴定,在犯罪现场,指纹是最常被发现的证据。本研究的主要目的是对兄弟姐妹和非兄弟姐妹的指纹进行对比分析,探讨指纹图案的相似性和相似性。采集了36个家庭144人(72名兄弟姐妹和72名非兄弟姐妹)的指纹。采用Jaccard相似指数分析兄弟姐妹和非兄弟姐妹指纹图案的相似度。变量之间的关联强度通过卡方检验和克莱默V检验来评估。结果表明,兄弟姐妹之间的拇指指纹模式具有显著的相似性(69.44%),其右拇指指纹具有一致性,而非兄弟姐妹的右拇指指纹的相似性仅为30.56%。统计分析揭示了兄弟姐妹之间的显著关联(p = 0.0002),表明右手拇指指纹模式有很强的相关性。这项研究对包括人类学、人口遗传学、医学遗传学和法医学在内的各个领域都有重大影响。此外,它可能有助于审查人口的相似性和差异,并可能通过查明家庭的相似性和相似性来帮助加强法医调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Science of Nature
The Science of Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Science of Nature - Naturwissenschaften - is Springer''s flagship multidisciplinary science journal. The journal is dedicated to the fast publication and global dissemination of high-quality research and invites papers, which are of interest to the broader community in the biological sciences. Contributions from the chemical, geological, and physical sciences are welcome if contributing to questions of general biological significance. Particularly welcomed are contributions that bridge between traditionally isolated areas and attempt to increase the conceptual understanding of systems and processes that demand an interdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Morphological and DNA analysis of pollen grains on butterfly individuals reveal their flower visitation history. Developmental basis of natural tooth shape variation in cichlid fishes. Discrepancies in the number of lines of arrested growth (LAG) in the tissues of the humerus and phalanx of sea turtles. Polarized vision in the eyes of the most effective predators: dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) Fingerprint resemblance amongst siblings and non-siblings — Forensic and anthropological implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1