Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of lightweight reactive powder concrete using lightweight expanded clay sand

Ahmadshah Abrahimi, V. Bhikshma
{"title":"Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of lightweight reactive powder concrete using lightweight expanded clay sand","authors":"Ahmadshah Abrahimi,&nbsp;V. Bhikshma","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01229-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the mechanical properties of lightweight reactive powder concrete (LWRPC) under normal curing conditions, with a focus on grades M70, M80, and M90. The research was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, conventional reactive powder concrete (RPC) was formulated using quartz sand and 0–30% supplementary cementitious materials (microsilica and alccofine), guided by the Elkem Material Mix Analyzer (EMMA) and the modified Andreassen model. In the second phase, lightweight expanded clay sand (LECS) was incorporated to develop LWRPC, and its mechanical properties were assessed. The study developed mix proportions for the specified grades and identified 10% microsilica and 20% alccofine as an effective blend for improving strength and workability, while LECS contributed to a more than 20% reduction in density. The developed LWRPC grades achieved 86–90% of its 28-day compressive strength within 7 days, with an average density of 1893 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, 22% lower than corresponding normal high-strength concrete (NHSC) grades, resulting in a 35% increase in structural efficiency. The modulus of elasticity of LWRPC was found to be 10% higher than high-strength lightweight concrete (HSLWC) in the literature. Additionally, flexural and splitting tensile strengths revealed improvements of 24% and 63%, respectively, compared to HSLWC, and 11% and 22% relative to NHSC grades. Although LWRPC has a higher cost ($239/m<sup>3</sup>) approximately three times that of NHSC, the results demonstrate that it offers superior structural performance, positioning it as a high-performance lightweight concrete.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 2","pages":"913 - 930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01229-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical properties of lightweight reactive powder concrete (LWRPC) under normal curing conditions, with a focus on grades M70, M80, and M90. The research was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, conventional reactive powder concrete (RPC) was formulated using quartz sand and 0–30% supplementary cementitious materials (microsilica and alccofine), guided by the Elkem Material Mix Analyzer (EMMA) and the modified Andreassen model. In the second phase, lightweight expanded clay sand (LECS) was incorporated to develop LWRPC, and its mechanical properties were assessed. The study developed mix proportions for the specified grades and identified 10% microsilica and 20% alccofine as an effective blend for improving strength and workability, while LECS contributed to a more than 20% reduction in density. The developed LWRPC grades achieved 86–90% of its 28-day compressive strength within 7 days, with an average density of 1893 kg/m3, 22% lower than corresponding normal high-strength concrete (NHSC) grades, resulting in a 35% increase in structural efficiency. The modulus of elasticity of LWRPC was found to be 10% higher than high-strength lightweight concrete (HSLWC) in the literature. Additionally, flexural and splitting tensile strengths revealed improvements of 24% and 63%, respectively, compared to HSLWC, and 11% and 22% relative to NHSC grades. Although LWRPC has a higher cost ($239/m3) approximately three times that of NHSC, the results demonstrate that it offers superior structural performance, positioning it as a high-performance lightweight concrete.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻质膨胀粘土砂轻质活性粉混凝土力学性能试验研究
本研究研究了轻质活性粉末混凝土(LWRPC)在正常养护条件下的力学性能,重点研究了M70、M80和M90等级。研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,在Elkem材料混合分析仪(EMMA)和改进的Andreassen模型的指导下,使用石英砂和0-30%的补充胶凝材料(微二氧化硅和乙醇)配制常规活性粉末混凝土(RPC)。在第二阶段,加入轻质膨胀粘土砂(LECS)开发LWRPC,并对其力学性能进行了评估。该研究开发了特定等级的混合比例,并确定了10%的微二氧化硅和20%的乙醇碱是提高强度和和易性的有效混合物,而LECS有助于将密度降低20%以上。开发的LWRPC等级在7天内达到了其28天抗压强度的86-90%,平均密度为1893 kg/m3,比相应的普通高强混凝土(NHSC)等级低22%,结构效率提高了35%。文献发现LWRPC的弹性模量比高强轻量化混凝土(HSLWC)高10%。此外,与HSLWC相比,抗弯和劈裂抗拉强度分别提高了24%和63%,与NHSC等级相比分别提高了11%和22%。虽然LWRPC的成本较高(239美元/立方米),大约是NHSC的三倍,但结果表明,它具有优越的结构性能,将其定位为高性能轻质混凝土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
期刊最新文献
A hybrid light GBM and Harris Hawks optimization approach for forecasting construction project performance: enhancing schedule and budget predictions Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of lightweight reactive powder concrete using lightweight expanded clay sand Metaheuristic machine learning for optimizing sustainable interior design: enhancing aesthetic and functional rehabilitation in housing projects Quantifying compressive strength in limestone powder incorporated concrete with incorporating various machine learning algorithms with SHAP analysis A new model for monitoring nonlinear elastic behavior of reinforced concrete structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1