Performance of MR fusion biopsy, systematic biopsy and combined biopsy on prostate cancer detection rate in 1229 patients stratified by PI-RADSv2 score on 3T multi-parametric MRI.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04753-3
Hannah H Riskin-Jones, Alex G Raman, Rushikesh Kulkarni, Corey W Arnold, Anthony Sisk, Ely Felker, David S Lu, Leonard S Marks, Steven S Raman
{"title":"Performance of MR fusion biopsy, systematic biopsy and combined biopsy on prostate cancer detection rate in 1229 patients stratified by PI-RADSv2 score on 3T multi-parametric MRI.","authors":"Hannah H Riskin-Jones, Alex G Raman, Rushikesh Kulkarni, Corey W Arnold, Anthony Sisk, Ely Felker, David S Lu, Leonard S Marks, Steven S Raman","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04753-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We analyzed the additional value of systematic biopsy (SB) to MR-Ultrasound fusion biopsy (MRgFbx) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), as increased sampling may cause increased morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study cohort was comprised of 1229 biopsy sessions between July 2016 and May 2020 in men who had a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) category ≥ 3 lesion on 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI (3TmpMRI) and subsequent combined biopsy (CB; MRgFbx and SB) for suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Cancer detection rates (CDR) were calculated for CB, MRgFbx and SB in the study cohort and sub-cohorts stratified by biopsy history and PI-RADSv2 category. For 927 men with unilateral MR-visible lesions, SB CDR was additionally calculated for contralateral (SBc) and ipsilateral (SBi) subcohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On CB, the CDR for csPCa was 54.8% (673/1229). CDR for csPCa was significantly higher for MRgFbx (50.0%, CI 47.1-52.8%) compared to SB (35.3%, CI 32.6-38.1%) for all PI-RADSv2 ≥ 3 categories (p < .05). The MRgFbx CDR for PI-RADSv2 categories 3, 4, and 5 were 81.5%, 88.5%, and 95.6% respectively. For unilateral lesion cases, significantly more csPCa was detected in the SBi compared to the SBc subcohort (30.1% (279/927) vs. 10.4%, (96/927), p < 0.001). The combination of MRgFbx and SBi detected csPCa in 97.0% (480) of the 495 csPCa detected by CB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRgFbx had a higher CDR for csPCa than SB. While CB detected more csPCa than either method alone, in patients with a PI-RADSv2 category of 5, MRgFbx approximated the performance of CB. In unilateral lesion cases, SBc provided minimal added benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04753-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the additional value of systematic biopsy (SB) to MR-Ultrasound fusion biopsy (MRgFbx) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), as increased sampling may cause increased morbidity.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study cohort was comprised of 1229 biopsy sessions between July 2016 and May 2020 in men who had a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) category ≥ 3 lesion on 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI (3TmpMRI) and subsequent combined biopsy (CB; MRgFbx and SB) for suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Cancer detection rates (CDR) were calculated for CB, MRgFbx and SB in the study cohort and sub-cohorts stratified by biopsy history and PI-RADSv2 category. For 927 men with unilateral MR-visible lesions, SB CDR was additionally calculated for contralateral (SBc) and ipsilateral (SBi) subcohorts.

Results: On CB, the CDR for csPCa was 54.8% (673/1229). CDR for csPCa was significantly higher for MRgFbx (50.0%, CI 47.1-52.8%) compared to SB (35.3%, CI 32.6-38.1%) for all PI-RADSv2 ≥ 3 categories (p < .05). The MRgFbx CDR for PI-RADSv2 categories 3, 4, and 5 were 81.5%, 88.5%, and 95.6% respectively. For unilateral lesion cases, significantly more csPCa was detected in the SBi compared to the SBc subcohort (30.1% (279/927) vs. 10.4%, (96/927), p < 0.001). The combination of MRgFbx and SBi detected csPCa in 97.0% (480) of the 495 csPCa detected by CB.

Conclusion: MRgFbx had a higher CDR for csPCa than SB. While CB detected more csPCa than either method alone, in patients with a PI-RADSv2 category of 5, MRgFbx approximated the performance of CB. In unilateral lesion cases, SBc provided minimal added benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对1229例3T多参数MRI PI-RADSv2评分分层的患者进行MR融合活检、系统活检和联合活检对前列腺癌检出率的影响
目的:我们分析了系统活检(SB)对磁共振超声融合活检(MRgFbx)检测临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的附加价值,因为增加采样可能导致发病率增加。材料和方法:该回顾性研究队列包括2016年7月至2020年5月期间1229次活检,患者在3次特斯拉多参数MRI (3TmpMRI)上前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADSv2)分类≥3的病变,随后联合活检(CB;MRgFbx和SB)检测疑似前列腺癌(PCa)。计算按活检史和PI-RADSv2分类的研究队列和亚队列中CB、MRgFbx和SB的癌症检出率(CDR)。对于927名单侧mr可见病变的男性,另外计算了对侧(SBc)和同侧(SBi)亚群的SB CDR。结果:csPCa的CDR为54.8%(673/1229)。在所有PI-RADSv2≥3类患者中,MRgFbx对csPCa的CDR (50.0%, CI 47.1-52.8%)明显高于SB (35.3%, CI 32.6-38.1%) (p结论:MRgFbx对csPCa的CDR高于SB。虽然CB比单独检测到更多的csPCa,但在PI-RADSv2 5类患者中,MRgFbx的表现接近CB。在单侧病变病例中,SBc提供的额外益处很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
MR enterography in Crohns disease and beyond: a pictorial review : Beyond Crohn's: a pictorial guide to MR enterography in small bowel disease. Urinary bladder diverticula: imaging features and complications. Esophageal motility disorders: a gastroenterologists' perspective for radiologists. Intracellular enhancement technique for gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of hepatic function. Identifying abdominal aortic aneurysm size and presence using Natural Language Processing of radiology reports: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1