Characterization of Clinicopathological Features and Autoantibody Profiles in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1007/s40257-024-00916-6
Svati Pazhyanur, Olivia Lamberg, Megan Hauptman, Jessica Cristiu, Noreen Khan, Allison C Billi, Mio Nakamura
{"title":"Characterization of Clinicopathological Features and Autoantibody Profiles in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Svati Pazhyanur, Olivia Lamberg, Megan Hauptman, Jessica Cristiu, Noreen Khan, Allison C Billi, Mio Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s40257-024-00916-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune condition characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations and limited treatment options. There is little research on the impact of commonly used diagnostic tests including antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) on disease course or responsiveness to treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study aims to address this gap by characterizing clinicopathological characteristics, patient demographics, and treatment response among patients with CLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients with a diagnosis of CLE based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes evaluated in the outpatient clinics of the Department of Dermatology at Michigan Medicine between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022. Chart review was conducted to collect patient and clinical data including CLE subtype, patient demographics, disease course, presence of SLE, ANA and ENA results, and CLE treatments and response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>390 patients with CLE were included, 86% (n = 334) of whom had biopsy-proven CLE. Most patients were female (77%), non-Hispanic (97%), and Caucasian (58%). Of all patients, 35% (n = 138) were ANA negative. The most common CLE treatments were antimalarials (86%, n = 336), topical steroids (85%, n = 331), systemic steroids (42%, n = 164), and mycophenolate mofetil (30%, n = 119). Treatment response was determined by clinician documentation and ranged from stabilization of disease to complete remission. Treatments with the highest CLE response rates included systemic steroids (84%, n = 138), antimalarials (63%, n = 212), belimumab (54%, n = 29), and topical steroids (50%, n = 165). Factors associated with lower response rates to antimalarials using chi-squared tests included anti-double stranded (ds) DNA (n = 54, 57% response among anti-dsDNA+ versus n = 165, 74% response among anti-dsDNA-), anti-Smith (n = 33, 54% versus n = 82, 72%), anti-RNP (n = 48, 56% versus n = 67, 73%), anti-SmRNP (n = 44, 54% versus n = 171, 74%), anti-chromatin (n = 33, 50% versus n = 179, 74%), SLE (n = 81, 57% versus n = 143, 79%), and ACLE subtype (n = 28, 58% versus n = 195, 71%). When controlling for demographics, CLE subtype, and presence of SLE using a logistic regression, factors associated with lower antimalarial response rates included anti-dsDNA (OR 0.5), anti-Smith (OR 0.5), and anti-chromatin (OR 0.6) CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that numerous patient characteristics, namely the presence of ACLE, SLE, and its most commonly implicated autoantibodies (i.e., anti-dsDNA and anti-Smith), are associated with lower response rates to first-line therapies, including topical steroids and antimalarials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7706,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-024-00916-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune condition characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations and limited treatment options. There is little research on the impact of commonly used diagnostic tests including antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) on disease course or responsiveness to treatment.

Objective: This single-center retrospective cohort study aims to address this gap by characterizing clinicopathological characteristics, patient demographics, and treatment response among patients with CLE.

Methods: The study included patients with a diagnosis of CLE based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes evaluated in the outpatient clinics of the Department of Dermatology at Michigan Medicine between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022. Chart review was conducted to collect patient and clinical data including CLE subtype, patient demographics, disease course, presence of SLE, ANA and ENA results, and CLE treatments and response.

Results: 390 patients with CLE were included, 86% (n = 334) of whom had biopsy-proven CLE. Most patients were female (77%), non-Hispanic (97%), and Caucasian (58%). Of all patients, 35% (n = 138) were ANA negative. The most common CLE treatments were antimalarials (86%, n = 336), topical steroids (85%, n = 331), systemic steroids (42%, n = 164), and mycophenolate mofetil (30%, n = 119). Treatment response was determined by clinician documentation and ranged from stabilization of disease to complete remission. Treatments with the highest CLE response rates included systemic steroids (84%, n = 138), antimalarials (63%, n = 212), belimumab (54%, n = 29), and topical steroids (50%, n = 165). Factors associated with lower response rates to antimalarials using chi-squared tests included anti-double stranded (ds) DNA (n = 54, 57% response among anti-dsDNA+ versus n = 165, 74% response among anti-dsDNA-), anti-Smith (n = 33, 54% versus n = 82, 72%), anti-RNP (n = 48, 56% versus n = 67, 73%), anti-SmRNP (n = 44, 54% versus n = 171, 74%), anti-chromatin (n = 33, 50% versus n = 179, 74%), SLE (n = 81, 57% versus n = 143, 79%), and ACLE subtype (n = 28, 58% versus n = 195, 71%). When controlling for demographics, CLE subtype, and presence of SLE using a logistic regression, factors associated with lower antimalarial response rates included anti-dsDNA (OR 0.5), anti-Smith (OR 0.5), and anti-chromatin (OR 0.6) CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that numerous patient characteristics, namely the presence of ACLE, SLE, and its most commonly implicated autoantibodies (i.e., anti-dsDNA and anti-Smith), are associated with lower response rates to first-line therapies, including topical steroids and antimalarials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮肤红斑狼疮患者的临床病理特征和自身抗体谱特征:一项单中心回顾性研究。
背景:皮肤红斑狼疮(CLE)是一种自身免疫性疾病,具有广泛的临床表现和有限的治疗选择。关于常用的诊断试验,包括抗核抗体(ANA)和可提取核抗原(ENA)对病程或对治疗的反应性的影响的研究很少。目的:本单中心回顾性队列研究旨在通过描述CLE患者的临床病理特征、患者人口统计学特征和治疗反应来解决这一差距。方法:研究纳入了2012年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在密歇根医学院皮肤科门诊诊所评估的基于国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)和第十版(ICD-10)代码诊断为CLE的患者。进行图表回顾以收集患者和临床数据,包括CLE亚型、患者人口统计学、病程、SLE的存在、ANA和ENA结果以及CLE治疗和反应。结果:纳入390例CLE患者,86% (n = 334)活检证实CLE。大多数患者为女性(77%)、非西班牙裔(97%)和白种人(58%)。在所有患者中,35% (n = 138)为ANA阴性。最常见的CLE治疗方法是抗疟药(86%,n = 336)、局部类固醇(85%,n = 331)、全身类固醇(42%,n = 164)和霉酚酸酯(30%,n = 119)。治疗反应由临床医生文件确定,范围从疾病稳定到完全缓解。CLE反应率最高的治疗包括全身类固醇(84%,n = 138)、抗疟药物(63%,n = 212)、贝利单抗(54%,n = 29)和局部类固醇(50%,n = 165)。因素相关的反应率较低的抗疟药物使用卡方测试包括anti-double链(ds) DNA (n = 54, 57%响应anti-dsDNA +与n = 165, 74% anti-dsDNA)之间的反应,anti-Smith (n = 33岁54% n = 82, 72%), anti-RNP (n = 48岁,56% n = 67, 73%), anti-SmRNP (n = 44岁54% n = 171, 74%), anti-chromatin (n = 33岁50% n = 179, 74%),系统性红斑狼疮(n = 81, 57% n = 143, 79%),和中国国际皮革展亚型(n = 28日58% n = 195, 71%)。当使用逻辑回归控制人口统计学、CLE亚型和SLE的存在时,与抗疟疾缓解率较低相关的因素包括抗dsdna (OR 0.5)、抗smith (OR 0.5)和抗染色质(OR 0.6)。我们的研究结果表明,许多患者的特征,即红斑狼疮、SLE及其最常见的自身抗体(即抗dsdna和抗smith)的存在,与一线治疗(包括局部类固醇和抗疟药)的低反应率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Dermatology is dedicated to evidence-based therapy and effective patient management in dermatology. It publishes critical review articles and clinically focused original research covering comprehensive aspects of dermatological conditions. The journal enhances visibility and educational value through features like Key Points summaries, plain language summaries, and various digital elements, ensuring accessibility and depth for a diverse readership.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Family History on Clinical Presentation and Biologic Treatment Response in Patients with Psoriasis: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Characterization of Clinicopathological Features and Autoantibody Profiles in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Biomarkers in Atopic Dermatitis: A Review of the Role of IL-13 and the Impact of Tralokinumab Treatment. Beyond the Herald Patch: Exploring the Complex Landscape of Pityriasis Rosea. A Maximum-Use Trial of Ruxolitinib Cream in Children Aged 2-11 Years with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1