EGEFACE: A new face memory test with static and dynamic images.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02592-0
Sonia Amado, Murat C Karataş, Elif Yüvrük, Aycan Kapucu
{"title":"EGEFACE: A new face memory test with static and dynamic images.","authors":"Sonia Amado, Murat C Karataş, Elif Yüvrük, Aycan Kapucu","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02592-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face memory is a crucial cognitive ability necessary for maintaining a healthy social life. Recent studies reveal large individual differences in face recognition ability. Face memory tests are used to evaluate this ability. The main purpose of this study was to develop a new face memory test (EGEFACE) addressing the limitations of existing tests using both static and dynamic stimuli to increase ecological validity; employing face recognition algorithms to adjust test difficulty; measuring face memory accuracy independently of response bias by including both target-absent and target-present trials and using ROC analysis; and developing a test to measure both ends of the face recognition ability spectrum. After building a new database of static and dynamic faces, we created three difficulty levels using a face recognition algorithm. We collected data from 703 participants in two steps and examined the internal consistency, split-half reliability, and item-total score correlations. The reliability analysis confirmed that both target-absent and target-present trials of EGEFACE were reliable. High EGEFACE performers scored near super recognizer levels on CFMT+, while low performers showed limited overlap with prosopagnosic-level performance on CFMT+, suggesting EGEFACE's sensitivity across different levels of face recognition ability. Overall, results indicated a moderate positive correlation between EGEFACE and CFMT+, showing that both tests assess similar cognitive skills, while a low to moderate correlation with KFMT suggests that EGEFACE measures cognitive ability that is related to yet distinct from face perception. The results suggest that EGEFACE shows promise as an ecologically valid and effective alternative tool for assessing individual differences in face memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 2","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02592-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Face memory is a crucial cognitive ability necessary for maintaining a healthy social life. Recent studies reveal large individual differences in face recognition ability. Face memory tests are used to evaluate this ability. The main purpose of this study was to develop a new face memory test (EGEFACE) addressing the limitations of existing tests using both static and dynamic stimuli to increase ecological validity; employing face recognition algorithms to adjust test difficulty; measuring face memory accuracy independently of response bias by including both target-absent and target-present trials and using ROC analysis; and developing a test to measure both ends of the face recognition ability spectrum. After building a new database of static and dynamic faces, we created three difficulty levels using a face recognition algorithm. We collected data from 703 participants in two steps and examined the internal consistency, split-half reliability, and item-total score correlations. The reliability analysis confirmed that both target-absent and target-present trials of EGEFACE were reliable. High EGEFACE performers scored near super recognizer levels on CFMT+, while low performers showed limited overlap with prosopagnosic-level performance on CFMT+, suggesting EGEFACE's sensitivity across different levels of face recognition ability. Overall, results indicated a moderate positive correlation between EGEFACE and CFMT+, showing that both tests assess similar cognitive skills, while a low to moderate correlation with KFMT suggests that EGEFACE measures cognitive ability that is related to yet distinct from face perception. The results suggest that EGEFACE shows promise as an ecologically valid and effective alternative tool for assessing individual differences in face memory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EGEFACE:一种新的静态和动态图像面部记忆测试。
面部记忆是维持健康社交生活所必需的重要认知能力。最近的研究表明,人脸识别能力存在很大的个体差异。面部记忆测试被用来评估这种能力。本研究的主要目的是开发一种新的面部记忆测试(EGEFACE),解决现有测试使用静态和动态刺激的局限性,以提高生态效度;采用人脸识别算法调整试题难度;通过纳入目标缺失试验和目标存在试验,并采用ROC分析,测量不受反应偏倚影响的面部记忆准确性;开发一种测试来测量面部识别能力谱的两端。在建立了静态和动态人脸的新数据库后,我们使用人脸识别算法创建了三个难度级别。我们分两步收集了703名参与者的数据,并检验了内部一致性、分半信度和项目总分的相关性。信度分析证实EGEFACE的靶缺失试验和靶存在试验都是可靠的。高水平的EGEFACE在CFMT+上的得分接近超级识别者水平,而低水平的参与者在CFMT+上的表现与面孔失认症水平的表现重叠有限,这表明EGEFACE在不同水平的人脸识别能力上具有敏感性。总体而言,结果表明EGEFACE和CFMT+之间存在中度正相关,表明这两项测试评估的认知技能相似,而与KFMT的低至中度相关表明,EGEFACE测量的认知能力与面部感知相关,但又不同。结果表明,EGEFACE有望成为评估面部记忆个体差异的生态有效的替代工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Speech onset time at home or in the lab: The role of testing environment and experimenter presence. Comparing aperiodic activity in consumer-grade and research-grade EEG: Reliability and association with mathematical ability. PupEyes: An interactive Python library for eye movement data processing. Design and analysis of individually randomized multiple baseline factorial trials. Metaphors in context and in isolation: Familiarity, aptness, concreteness, metaphoricity, and structure norms for 300 two-word expressions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1