Jia-Hui Xia, Yi-Bang Cheng, Ting-Yan Xu, Qian-Hui Guo, Chak-Ming Chan, Lei-Xiao Hu, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang
{"title":"Effect of a calcium-channel blocker and β-blocker combination on reading-to-reading blood pressure variability: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"Jia-Hui Xia, Yi-Bang Cheng, Ting-Yan Xu, Qian-Hui Guo, Chak-Ming Chan, Lei-Xiao Hu, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the nitrendipine/atenolol combination in comparison with standard-dose nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy in reducing blood pressure (BP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized, crossover trial, 32 patients (30-65 years) with grade 1 hypertension and elevated daytime reading-to-reading BPV were randomly assigned to receive either the nitrendipine/atenolol combination (10/20 mg) or standard-dose nitrendipine (10 mg) or atenolol (25 mg) monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by a crossover to another treatment for 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 31 patients (mean [±SD] age, 49.2 ± 9.6 years) and 12 men. The nitrendipine/atenolol combination significantly reduced from baseline clinic and ambulatory BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.002), and 24 h and daytime systolic and diastolic BPV as assessed by SD and average real variability (P ≤ 0.042), but not the coefficient of variation nor nighttime BPV indices (P ≥ 0.06). Significant differences between the nitrendipine/atenolol combination and nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy at the end of treatment were observed in clinic BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.042), but not in 24 h, daytime and nighttime blood pressure and pulse rate, except for daytime DBP and 24 h and daytime pulse rate (P ≤ 0.049). There were no significant differences in BPV between the combination and monotherpy groups at the end of treatment (P ≥ 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nitrendipine/atenolol combination reduced daytime reading-to-reading BPV, but did not show superiority to nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the nitrendipine/atenolol combination in comparison with standard-dose nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy in reducing blood pressure (BP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) as assessed by ambulatory BP monitoring.
Methods: In a randomized, crossover trial, 32 patients (30-65 years) with grade 1 hypertension and elevated daytime reading-to-reading BPV were randomly assigned to receive either the nitrendipine/atenolol combination (10/20 mg) or standard-dose nitrendipine (10 mg) or atenolol (25 mg) monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by a crossover to another treatment for 6 weeks.
Results: The final analysis included 31 patients (mean [±SD] age, 49.2 ± 9.6 years) and 12 men. The nitrendipine/atenolol combination significantly reduced from baseline clinic and ambulatory BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.002), and 24 h and daytime systolic and diastolic BPV as assessed by SD and average real variability (P ≤ 0.042), but not the coefficient of variation nor nighttime BPV indices (P ≥ 0.06). Significant differences between the nitrendipine/atenolol combination and nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy at the end of treatment were observed in clinic BP and pulse rate (P ≤ 0.042), but not in 24 h, daytime and nighttime blood pressure and pulse rate, except for daytime DBP and 24 h and daytime pulse rate (P ≤ 0.049). There were no significant differences in BPV between the combination and monotherpy groups at the end of treatment (P ≥ 0.25).
Conclusion: The nitrendipine/atenolol combination reduced daytime reading-to-reading BPV, but did not show superiority to nitrendipine or atenolol monotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research.
This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.